Slashdot Mirror


The Thermal Paste Revolution

arhines writes "ZZZ is running an article about an interesting new thermal paste which surpasses even solder in thermal conductance by 33 percent. If this paste makes it to the market sometime soon, we'll all surely be thinking about putting it in our boxes. In fact, if use of the paste becomes commonplace, it may even give the semiconductor industry a little speed boost."

35 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Actually... by jbardell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    " Lots of OEM or low end cooling setups use either a thermal interface pad (TIM) or that white goop you get at radio shack. The fact is that neither of those does a great job of transferring heat from the processor to the heatsink. While they work ok, they don't exactly assist Moore's law in fulfilling itself by limiting clock speeds with heat." Actually, that's hardly true at all. RS's compound has been found to be one of the best out there. Just take a look at some reviews that include it.

    1. Re: Actually... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep. If you peeled off that pad first, you would have probably gotten another 2-3 degrees. The pad uses a "wax-like" substance (i.e. a solid a room temperature, but liquid when lightly heated). The problem is with pads is that once you heat them after being installed, the wax-like substance just imbedded itself into all the microscopic cracks and holes on the top of both your processor and heatsink (doing its job). But now it is there, it doesn't just come off when you peel off that pad. It is there, and there pretty much for good, acting as a barrier between your heatsink and CPU and any other better thermal compound you use aftward.

      Now, I didn't say it was there perminent, but it is close to it. You can get it off the heatsink, as you simply need to heat up the heatsink (a very hot hair-dryer will do this). Once you heat it up, you can start wiping the heatsink down with a cloth. Or you can lap your heatsink (use several grades of sandpaper to get a polished, flat, smooth surface, usually starting with 100-300 grit paper and working your way up to 1000-3000 grit paper, depending on how "anal" you are :) ). This will remove the outer layer of the heatsink metal as well as the microscopic cracks and holes on it, which will include your heat-pad substance.

      The CPU is almost impossible to fully remove the heat-pad substance. You don't want to lap a modern day CPU, as all you will do is "create" microscopic cracks and holes. Modern CPU's are laser cut and pretty much perfectly flat. There are "some" cracks, but they are much smaller/finer then almost any sand paper you will ever find. You also risk damaging the CPU as the manufacturers now have traces and transistors located micrometers from the top of the CPU surface. Heating the CPU can easily damage it if you are not careful about how hot you let it get. So it is usually very dangerous for you to try to remove the substance from the CPU if you have not already done it several times (or don't mind wasting whatever you spend on that CPU when you need to go out and buy a new one).

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    2. Re: Actually... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Heating the CPU can easily damage it if you are not careful about how hot you let it get. So it is usually very dangerous for you to try to remove the substance from the CPU if you have not already done it several times (or don't mind wasting whatever you spend on that CPU when you need to go out and buy a new one).

      You know, that sounds like a major pain in the ass to save a few degrees. Maybe manufacturers should just make cooler CPUs instead of us needing industrial strength copper heatsinks and 19mm fans. I really miss the days when a heatsink and fan were optional on a CPU. I think my 386 was the last of that kind though. My 486DX2/66 ran fine after the fan on the heatsink failed though so the heatsink was good enough. Even most Pentium systems were just fine with a big heat sink and no fan. Nowadays all my Athlon systems sound like I'm at an airport with the 5 or 6 fans I need in my system to keep it cool.

  2. Help prevent crashing routers... by LamerX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe this stuff can be put in all those crappy DSL modems and routers that freeze up due to overheating. It would be easier than modding the whole damn thing to pieces with fans and whatnot...

    1. Re:Help prevent crashing routers... by VPN3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It actually will not help much. I've used both generic and that silver based Artic Gold (can't remember if that's the brand or not). I use MotherBoard Monitor to monitor temps on my XP/Game system which is equiped with a SLK-800 heatsink and 80mm fan.

      There is a 0 degree difference between using the sivler stuff and the generic goo. I've also swapped from the goo to silver paste on my old dual 700 when replaceing a processor. No measurable difference in heat/performance.

      Your best bet with those DSL routers:

      Find a good 486 heatsink/fan combo, mix a drop of silver compound with a very small drop of epoxy, then mount the sucker on your DSL router's CPU. Use a bench clamp or book (or some combination) to secure the heatsink/fan overnight while the compound hardens. The next morning, your DSL router should run nice and cool. Keep in mind, if you use too much epoxy in your mixture, that heatsink will not be coming off there. A lighter mix will result in something you can knock off there with the handle of a screwdriver if you ever need to get it off.

      I've found old 486 sinks and fans are very handy at cooling off just about anything they'll fit on except for peltier solutions.

      If the cost of $5 is prohibitive, check your closet for old computers and find your free parts there.

  3. don't believe the hype? by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They seem to have just duplicated the inventor's press release - the article doesn't contain any independent evaluation of the substance whatsoever.

  4. 33% by gfody · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of 0.004% that thermal paste actually makes a difference

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
    1. Re:33% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Copper is a good heat conductor, and that's why it's used to spread the heat to a large surface area. The thermal paste has a different job: It only has to thermally connect the heatsink to the processor. It does not need to conduct heat over comparatively big distances. The kind of gap-filler between the heatsink and the processor is not as important as makers of the only substance which costs more per milligram than inkjet ink would like you to believe (at least as long as it's not air). The gap which the paste has to bridge simply isn't big enough for the paste to make a difference, compared to the thickness of both the silicon processor layers and the heatsink.

  5. Re:Hmmm. by silvaran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think you misunderstood the statement. They may have compared the thermal conductance of this material to solder, but they're not looking to replace solder. Solder is made up of metals, so it's naturally a good conductor. But metal doesn't spread very well over microscopic cracks -- and no, you can't fill in the cracks with solder, because the metal will contract when it cools and be useless as a thermal paste. You wouldn't want to use a thermal paste as a solder, because thermal paste typically takes a very, very long time to dry when not exposed (ie: between a cpu and a heatsink).

    So it looks like CowboyNeal is saying if this new thermal paste can improve the effectiveness of a heatsink (and fan) by a reasonable amount, manufacturers will be able to push their clock speeds a little higher.

  6. I'll Take a Barrel -- Over to SCO by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny
    Give me a barrel of it to take over to SCO headquarters and hose those guys down to maybe cool them off.

    Thought about doing the same to the RIAA, but I'd need a whole tanker truck load at least there.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  7. The Revolution by Biomechanoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Thermal Paste Revolution

    Oh you bet, it will be like 'before and after', a marking point in history. As in; I remember back in the days, before the revolution.

    Remember these days people, its one of those great turning points in history and you are part of it.

  8. Re:Messy by gfody · · Score: 4, Informative

    according to the article you dont see the 33% improvement until you apply about twice the normal pressure. imagine the cracked cores

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
  9. Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, that's just perfect. Just yesterday I was looking at my Power Macintosh G4 and saying "You know, if there's one thing this computer's missing, it's paste. If only there were some way I could just take paste and smear it all over the inside of this computer."

    And now here we are!

    1. Re:Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You misunderstood something.

      It's not about applying that paste all over your computer - it has to applied to *special* parts in your computer in order to cool it down:

      The fan of your power supply unit, for example.

      It does a great job taking care that the temperature in your computer will not rise too high.

      1. Make sure that your computer is turned off !!!

      2. Just apply some of the paste (e.g. 10-15 table spoons) to the fan.

      3. No need to wait any longer. Turn that thing on again.

      4. Watch the great effect that this new thermal paste will have.

      You may also use the paste with water cooling systems. Just mix the water/paste 30/70 - don't worry about any strange noises.

      As said in another thread, tuning your computer might void your warranty - instead, you can still ask your PC dealer to do it for you (and remember: 10-15 table spoons, otherwise the effect of the paste will not "visible".)

    2. Re:Paste. by quigonn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Although is posting is moderated as funny, this guy is absolutely right. I think, all the cooling stuff that is put into x86-based PCs in these days is just the wrong way. Computers should be well-designed (I'm speaking of the hardware, not the case), and when CPU manufacturers can't produce CPUs that stay cool enough with only a passive cooler, then they shouldn't sell these CPUs. I mean, powerful computers can be built without this botch. For example, all the computers built by Apple, or the VAXstations that were built by DEC. VAXstations were pretty powerful machines (especially the VS4000 series), and they came without any passive coolers. Only the PSU had a fan, which was extremely silent. And the VAXstation was a much more powerful computer than a PC at the time they were built.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    3. Re:Paste. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh dear lord. You haven't heard a "Windtunnel" G4 at full howl, have you? ;)

      I have a QuickSilver G4 on my desk, and let me assure you, it is far from fanless. The Windtunnels (AKA "Quad Nostril") took it a step further.

      I agree that some current CPU designs are downright absurd (Intel so completely gave up on the concept of being able to cool their highly-clocked - over-clocked if you ask me - chips that they designed in a feature to slow down/turn off sections of the chip in order to lower temperatures), but passive cooling only gets you so much. I really doubt VAXstations could operate efficiently with a pair of 15,000rpm drives inside the case, which my QS handles with reasoanble aplomb (though I splurged on additional cooling - mostly a PCP&C external supply exhaust fan - to keep temps at reasonable levels).

      The last fanless Apple desktop computer I can think of were the 2nd-generation iMacs (the ones with completely clear sides, or flower-power, and whatever god-awful color scheme they came up with at the end). Everything else from their recent lineups, even portables, have had fans.

      Supposedly the G5s will feature quieter operation, by virtue of seperated thermal zones with different thermally-controlled fans exhausting air from each zone - they only spin as fast as that zone requires. To some extent, it is probably the wave of the future in this regard, in that increased thermal needs have butted up against all the buffont bettys tranquility requirements.

      But if another artist whines about how loud their 10,000+rpm drive is, and how their tuned-for-quiet-not-performance-operation IDE drive at home is quieter, I swear I'm gonna stuff a high-CFM 120mm fan in their pie-hole... and maybe a high-cfm 80mm fan in their corn chute.

      Nah. That'd be cruel.

  10. Only marginally helpfull by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's been true for some time that the thermal junction between the top of the chip and the heatsink isn't nearly as important as the internal heat disipation (sp?) of the chip. While a modern chip with a decent heatsink can feel merely warm to the touch the internal gate temperature can be aproaching bounderies where the thermal stress is actually damaging gates. This is one of several barriers keeping 3D memory chips from becoming reality (the other major one is cost of manufacturing a working chip of multiple layers, but even pie in the sky lab samples have problems because of heat disipation from the core of the stack.)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  11. Re:Messy by duffhuff · · Score: 4, Informative
    Correct application is critical to the effectiveness of thermal goop. The idea is to get a very thin, uncontaminated layer of the stuff between the chip and the heatsink. Any kind of oil, scratches, dust, etc. can cause efficiency to drop.

    Have a look at the instructions for Arctic Silver 3 to see what kind of steps are needed.

  12. How adhesive is that paste? by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Working in a test lab for PCs I encountered one problem with heat conducting paste: Since Intel introduced the mPGA 478 housing for their CPUs the ZIF socket on the mainboard is much smaller than the heatsink above. That means, if the paste between processor and heatsink is too much adhesive it is like the processor is glued to the heatsink and every time you remove the heatsink (e.g. for changing the CPU) you pull out the processor from a closed ZIF socket! Ok, so far the processors survived but I don't think that this is nice anyway.

    1. Re:How adhesive is that paste? by aed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If possible, switch on the machine for a few minutes before removing the heatsink.
      This will heat the CPU and it will usually melt the thermal paste. It should now be easier to remove the heatsink from the cpu.

  13. Is it as good as vegemite? by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a tube of Arctic Silver 2 (yeah, I'm like two generations behind) but I'm not sure that I really needed it. This dude tried out several non-conventional thermal transfer compounds, including vegemite.(!) When properly applied, there wasn't a huge difference between them. In fact, in the (extremely specific) conditions, the vegemite and toothpaste outperformed the Arctic Silver! (Obviously, you should read the article for details.)

    The article's point isn't that you should be using toothpaste; rather, it's that make sure you properly apply whatever thermal compound you do use, and don't expect miracles. No matter how effective your thermal transfer, you've still got to dump the heat somewhere. If you're running close to the edge of thermal failure, there are almost certainly other, much more effective cooling solutions. This new paste is probably a good thing, but don't expect miracles.

  14. Thermal Grease and AMD's Warranty by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  15. Only on /. by RHIC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only on Slashdot would you ever see the words "interesting" and "thermal paste" used together.

  16. Cooling Methods by paulnuyu · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article on thermal paste is quite interesting, such advances are sure to aid in the cooling levels for the near future. However, I often wonder why there hasn't been much development in the way of devising viable (read: cheap) alternative cooling solutions (e.g water/fliud, air piping, effective passive cooling). It seems that the now archaic heatsink/fan just isn't cutting it anymore, at least down to a bearable level that is (the amount of noise my cpu fan creates is ridiculous).

    Part of this is the chip maker's fault, for running the chip too hot/fast. Likewise, part of the fault rests on the case/fan manufacturers, as the cases become increasingly smaller, dealing with cooling becomes harder, as there is less space to work in.

    It is getting to the point where I feel that my peace of mind with regards to noise is well worth the sacrifice of speed. After all, I don't need the full power of my cpu most of the time, just when compiling/rendering/encoding. The cpu just isn't the bottleneck anymore, and it's useless to continue in this speed race, not until the other system components catch up. Why doesn't the industry work together to create a better solution? It's high time I'm rid of the constant roar of these machines.

  17. Who is going to use paste instead of solder? by khaine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This seems a very odd comparison to me; when was the last time you soldered a heatsink to a hot component or used paste to assemble a circuit board? The use in chips seems a little suspect too..

    I can just see the warnings now. "Do not mount vertically or internal circuits will drip out!!!" :-)

  18. Re:But by Psyko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Technologies like this are complementary to each other.

    As someone previously pointed out, one of the major problems facing device manufacturers is transferring the heat out of the die. When improvements are made in this area, then the problem will still be transferring the heat away from the die where it can be dissipated by however (water cooled slug, air cooled sink, etc. etc.) once the heat can be effectively moved away from the die-face at 99.999% efficiency there's still the issue of radiating the heat away from the assembly altogether. Then there is still the ambient air temp (have you priced out a redundant 10+ ton HVAC system for a datacenter lately?)...

    It's all a catch 22 but anytime a significant improvement is made in one of these areas is leads to higher performance and lower costs (tolerances can come down or stay at the same level for a bit while increasing performance), which by themselves may seem minor, but when they are all taken together make a significant improvement.

    --
    01:36AM up 426 days, 2:46, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.11, 0.05
  19. who CARES? by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Informative
    * this is going to make a couple of degrees difference, tops. you'd have more effect moving your case a couple of inches further from the wall

    * who runs within 2 degrees of max temp for their CPU? some crazy overclockers, but it's not exactly reliable practice, is it? if it was 10 degrees, maybe but it's not going to make that much difference

    * stop knocking the thermal pads. retail CPUs use these because joe sixpack can't f*vck it up and claim on their warranty. if you don't like it, scrape it off and stick a blob of arctic silver or similar

    * bear in mind AMDs warranty only applies if you use approved thermal solutions

  20. Analysis by fven · · Score: 5, Informative

    This may help solve the problem that thermal compound applied badly is worse (in terms of temperature) than none at all.

    In a thermal compound we are seeking somethng that:
    (1) will conduct heat to the heatsink better than air
    (2) will remain inert under extended high temperature exposure
    (3) is non toxic (nice seeing as we have to deal with the stuff)

    It is difficult for a material to conduct heat better than air if (large or many) air bubbles are present between the two surfaces, trapped by the compound itself.

    So we all know how silicone performs, it meets 2 and 3 but there are some issues with 1, mainly because of the air bubble issue.

    Carbon black, polyehtylene glycol and ethyl cellulose are both non-hazardous and ethyl cellulose is only mildly hazardous (Material Safety Data Sheets www.merck.co.th, criterion 3 met)
    Particulate size is small (should lick the air bubble problem).
    Spreadability should be a-ok (ethyl cellulose is a molding compound.
    No polymerisation or other chemical reaction should occur (stable mixture, criterion 2 met).
    Carbon is a brilliant conductor in this form ( criterion 1 met)

    I think it'll work

  21. Myths about the use of thermal grease. by tombrown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About 10 years ago I was working on a product that used 200 Amp IGBT's for a traction drive. I spent about a month researching the thermal circuits used to cool these devices.

    The conclusion: The best thermal contact is metal to metal. The best way of acheiving this is by "lapping" the contact area's together with a fine abrasive. Once your have done this the application of a minute amount of thermal grease improves conductivity by less than 0.5%. We also discovered that applying more than a fine film or grease significantly decreased the conductivity (10% or more).

    Lay off the grease!

  22. Re:Clock speeds up by archeopterix · · Score: 4, Funny
    the net amount of heat generated by the processor will remain the same, so I'd suggest moving either the box or your legs to solve that one...
    I suggest covering your legs (the side away from the CPU) with the thermal paste.
  23. Re:Well I'm disappointed... by tommck · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yeah, I asked my wife if she'd put it in her box, but she just ignored me...

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  24. Low Temp KY by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be a breakthrough for heat dissipating sexual lubricants.

    "Honey, don't use so much, the Slashdot guys said to use a thin layer."

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  25. Curse thermodynamics! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Said in best Charlton Heston voice)

    Damn you entropy! DAMN YOU TO HELL!!!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  26. Dammit! Not another one! by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, I don't WANT another cooling method... I don't want processor makers to be able to squeeze another few MHz out of their processors for one simple reason... They run too damn hot already!

    I say this for two important reasons:

    #1. More heat happens to mean that much more power is being wasted. Here in CA, electricity is expensive, and my electric bill doubled when I hooked-up my new system. Now I'm paying more for the electricity to keep my computer running 24/7 (yes, it needs to be running) than I am for my 1.5M/768kbps DSL... That's just so very wrong.

    #2. I live in a big damn desert... That means temperatures are regularly very close to 130F degrees... It seems like 9 months out of the year temperatures are above 100F, and keeping a system cool when temperatures are that high is not easy. I've been forced to install a swamp cooler near my computers, and although that does a good job of cooling, it is louder than the most annoying computer fan you've ever heard, so it's not a plesant solution. Don't talk to me about water cooling/heat pipes becasue they only conduct the heat out of the computer, leaving it to heat up the building. Don't talk about sucking the heat outdoors, because it's so hot outdoors that the computers would be overheating in no time.

    Personally, I would love to be using a fast PPC machine, but the price is just prohibitive... I'd have to be using my current Athlon XP 2000 for years before the electric bill would ammount to the inital price of an equivalently fast PPC system, and that wouldn't be taking into account that the PPC system would still be using up 1/4-1/2 the same ammount of electricity.

    Frankly, I would like to see Laptop computer processors in desktop systems. That would be a decent compromise, that would keep things cool, without having something that is incredibly slow (eg. Via C3).

    (Oh yeah, and: #3. Global warming crap, blah blah blah.)

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  27. Not to be used in that manner... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thermal pastes are thermally conductive, not electrically so. In fact, you want them to be a damned good electrical insulator. If you'd read the article (I did several days ago- [H]ardOCP had coverage of this one earlier this week...) you'd have found out that carbon black, the substance in question, outpaces pretty much everything else (including diamond and nanotube based compounds in development) because it fills the gaps between the heatsink and the chip's heat spreader, etc. with thermally conductive materials better than anything else.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas