Slashdot Mirror


XForms Becomes Proposed Recommendation

leighklotz writes "The W3C has announced that XForms is now a Proposed Recommendation, after certification of one full implementation (open source Java XSmiles from Finland) and two more implementations of each feature (the Internet Explorer plug-in FormsPlayer and the Java standalone Novell xPlorer). XForms is the next generation of forms for the Web, and uses an XML-based three-layer model: data model, data, and user interface. XForms uses CSS for device independencence and is designed for integration into XHTML 2, SVG, and other XML-based markup languages. A host of other implementations are available or in progress, but my pick for most interesting is DENG, which is an XForms to Flash compiler written in Flash. DENG supports XForms, SVG, RSS, XHTML, and CSS. XForms is in consideration for other standards as diverse as Universal Remote Controls and the UK Government Interoperability Framework, and was developed with the participation of IBM, Oracle, Xerox, Adobe, Novell, SAP, Cardiff, PureEdge, and a host of other companies, universities, and invididuals."

7 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. in a nutshell... by selderrr · · Score: 4, Funny

    xforms is fully buzzword compliant and serves as an excellent tool for dumb managers to wank with.

  2. So many links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all that, I think Bender summed it up best:

    "Interesting! No, wait, the other thing. Tedious."

  3. Key Feature by billstr78 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Key Goals of XForms

    • Support for handheld, television, and desktop browsers, plus printers and scanners
    • Suspend and Resume support



    Suspend and Resume. Oh, that'll be usefull for last minute regret when making large online purchaces.

    Click here to submit form to purchase $2000 computer... Wait! I changed my mind. Suspend. Suspend. Hmmm... I can always use another computer, Resume!
  4. Re:WTF? That name is already taken, try again. by SpamJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just like Firebird. What really gets me is not the fact that these names have already been taken but that at least two seperate people on earth think these are good names for their projects. Firebird is a bad name and it's only made worse by the Thunderbird project, confusing as hell. One should be called Fire and one Thunder, now that's pretty cool. Except for the fact that Fire is an IM on the Mac.

    XForms is a bad name. Sure, it kinda sounds like XHTML. Here's a reality check: XHTML is a bad name. X2 was a bad name for a movie, XP is a bad version number and so is MX. X is a stupid letter. Don't go tacking it onto everything you name just to make it sound cool. A name doesn't make something cool, but it sure can make it sound stupid.

    Don't even try to explain that extensible starts with an X instead of an E unless you're speaking in ebonics, and in that case, mad props.

  5. CSS for device independence? by irritating+environme · · Score: 2, Funny

    Huh?

    As someone who once wrote a cross-device content delivery platform for PDAs, WML/HDML phones, and browsers, I repeat:

    Huh?

    Craptastic.

    --


    Hey, I'm just your average shit and piss factory.
  6. independencence? by renard · · Score: 4, Funny
    XForms uses CSS for device independencence...

    Here at /. we have human editors for spelling independencence... not to mention English grammar transcendencence... or (my favorite) just plain incoherencence...

  7. Re:WTF? That name is already taken, try again. by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 2, Funny

    Xcellent post.