CAPPS II Guidelines Released
W33dz writes "WIRED magazine has released an article detailing the Transportation Safety Administration's latest guidelines for the second-generation Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System, or CAPPS II. As outlined in a notice to be published Friday in the Federal Register, CAPPS II will rate every passenger by checking dates of birth, home addresses and phone numbers against commercial databases and the government's terrorist watch lists. This is a pullback from the original plan which called for wide dissemination of data including financial and medical history."
Stupid stewardesses who assume a wristwatch can doom an aircraft at takeoff and landing. Can't bring a dang fingernail clipper onboard. How about geek airlines? Robot attendents, Internet access on every seat, and no problem with bringing any weapon on board (bring a working laser blaster and get a free flight!).
-Libertarian secular transhumanist
Are you looking forward to your inevitable cavity search? ;-)
Do you like German cars?
This is a pullback from the original plan which called for wide dissemination of data including financial and medical history.
Good thing, too! The last thing I need is the flight attendants laughing at me when I board the plane because they can see my bank account and medical "records."
Like my boss said when they started piss testing us at work last week, "Bring it on! I've got nothing to hide."
Fuck freedom or privacy, right? If you even question it, you're obviously hiding something or doing drugs or what not.
Now I can refuse to fly, on ideological grounds, and not have to deal with flying to visit the family for the holidays.
my sig's at the bottom of the page.
Evidently somebody watched Speed once too many times.
ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
How are they planning to deal with the large numbers of false positives a system like this will generate? In my experience when you try to predict such low probability events as being a terrorist (no matter what you 'should' believe, even 100,000 terrorists in the US is only 0.0004%) the number of false positives far exceeds the number of true ones (or even the potentially true ones if you picked them all up).
Your terrorist estimate is way too low. Remember Bush's (paraphrased) statement: "If you don't agree with me you are a terrorist." That really widens the who-is-a-terrorist net, so the real concern is with false negatives. : (
The New Plan slogan:
"CAPPS II - It's Double Plus Good !!"
. . . even 100,000 terrorists in the US is only 0.0004% . . .
Which brings me to a rather insightful premise. Why don't we just have each passenger provide his occupation and purpose of his trip? If he puts "terrorist," then we know he may be a threat. If he puts "to do Allah|God|Limbaugh's Will," then we know he needs to be pulled off the plane. Because, not every terrorist is going to hijack any plane they travel on. Some need to make it to terrorist training camps, or Redmond, WA.
What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
They've busted two CAPPS?