Slashdot Mirror


Starchaser Rocket Capsule Drop Tests Successful

thaig writes "Starchaser Industries reports that their NOVA 2 rocket capsule has completed two manned drop-tests from an altitude of 10,000 feet. The capsule was put through a number of manoeuvres during its descent to fully validate the steerable ram-air parachute canopy that made it possible to fly the craft like a glider. Starchaser Industries' Thunderbird project is a contender for the $10 million X-PRIZE. Here's the earlier story."

24 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Starchaser by bethane · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well Starchaser are supposed to be launching their one man Nova rocket with sometime this year, with teamleader Steve Bennett in the pilots seat. However they said that last year... Britain could have been third country to orbit a satellite in the sixties had the Black Prince launcher been given the go ahead (see http://members.aol.com/nicholashl/ukspace/ukspace. htm for a comprehensive history of British rocketry in the fifties and sixties), and was the sixth to orbit in 1971. But remember that Britain was very much the declining power at this time and the labour government was cancelling most areospace projects at the time. Its typically British that we're the only country that developed a launcher then cancelled it after one sucessful flight.

    --


    Bethanie: Whore...
    Fan Whore
    1. Re:Starchaser by spinlocked · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But remember that Britain was very much the declining power at this time and the labour government was cancelling most areospace projects at the time.

      Also remember that the early space programmes were the public face of ICBM programmes. It became clear that trident was going to be our nuclear deterent, so there was little point in continuing the rocketry side of things. The deterent we had in the meantime was characteristicly heath-robinson. I'm a huge fan of the 'delta lady' myself - the vulcan, but they have one of each at Duxford

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    2. Re:Starchaser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its typically British that we're the only country that developed a launcher then cancelled it after one sucessful flight.

      You may not remember, but Russia did the same with their Buran shuttle (and here are some interesting pictures of the jet-powered prototype almost identical to the one that flew to orbit [except, of course, for the propulsion system]). So they still had / have other means of getting into space - but all the same - it was a lot of effort for nothing.

    3. Re:Starchaser by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

      British Rocket Science 1950 - present.

      Scene: Top secret rocket testing range somewhere in
      the home counties. The Mk IV rocket squats
      on it's launching pad.

      WC Ponsonby-Psmythe: What ho chaps spiffing what?
      So this is the old jalopy what?

      Gen. Fforbes-Fforbes: Jolly good show. I say you
      eggs what times the orrf?

      Private Erk: 0600 m'lud. (tugs forelock)

      Ponsonby-Psmythe: Top hole. Here comes the boffin.

      Prof. Quatermass: (Reading instructions on box)
      Hmm. Light blue touch paper ...
      Stand well back. Ahhh.

      Ponsonby-Psmythe: What's the Cricket score? Had a
      jolly old punt on old bean.

      No wonder the UK got nowhere fast.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    4. Re:Starchaser by mikerich · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Also remember that the early space programmes were the public face of ICBM programmes. It became clear that trident was going to be our nuclear deterent, so there was little point in continuing the rocketry side of things.

      I think you mean Polaris, and we already had launched HMS Resolution in 1968. The programme was actually cancelled to try and stem a gaping hole in government spending.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  2. Obligatory slashdotting joke by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno about the capsule, but their site spiralled down in flames and crashed before there was even a single comment.

  3. Article text in case of Slashdotting by Magic+Thread · · Score: 5, Informative

    Starchaser Industries have successfully completed two manned parachute drop tests of their NOVA 2 rocket capsule.

    The manned drop tests were carried out at the Red Lake drop zone in Arizona USA on the 22nd and 24th July 2003. The capsule was deployed from the rear cargo door of a Fairchild C123K aircraft at an altitude of 10,000 feet.

    The capsule was put through a number of manoeuvres during its descent to fully validate the steerable ram-air parachute canopy that made it possible to fly the craft like a glider. Nova 2 was then brought in for a precision landing. Steve Bennett, Managing Director of Starchaser Industries, said, "We are pleased with how the capsule has performed, we've completed two very successful flights. These drop tests mark a significant milestone in Starchaser Industries manned space programme. We have proved the different key systems in our rocket programme and now have the technology to push forward in our bid to win the X PRIZE"

    Weighing in at 250 kg and measuring 3-meters in length, the single seat Nova 2 capsule has become Britain's first manned rocket capsule and has been developed to test a variety of systems for use in project Thunderbird; Starchaser Industries entry into the US $10 million X PRIZE, which is on offer to the first non-governmental organisation capable of launching three people into space.

    Steve Bennett is available for comment following the success of the manned drop tests, video footage and digital stills are available, please contact Lee Kirby on 08700 278766288 or email lee@starchaser.co.uk

  4. Informative? What the fuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, next time check the link before you moderate.

  5. Details by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone know how they plan to slow it from orbital speed to a speed where they and safely deploy the 'chute?

    This would seem to be the second hardest part. (Hardest being geting the thing orbial in the first place.)

    -Peter

    1. Re:Details by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's called the ground. ........ SPLAT ... POP ... chute deployed. :-)

      --
      siggy played guitar
  6. Wrong by Magic+Thread · · Score: 3, Informative

    That story was about planning a test drop. This story describes how the test drop has been finished successfully.

  7. More of this is needed by egg+troll · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm glad to see the private sector making advances in space flight. Personally, I don't believe this is an area that our government should be spending any money on. I know that this won't make me popular with the Slashdot crowd.


    However, there are other more important things that our government should be spending money upon. Education, health care and welfare programs are all vastly more important than space exploration. Space programs are a luxury, and in these tough economic times its a luxury that Americans should do without.


    The fact that this program was successful shows that the private sector can shoulder the spaceflight burden. Hopefully our government will recognize this and begin to shift funding to programs that are more worthy.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  8. Thunderbird the rocket? by pajama · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thunderbird the rocket or Thunderbird the mail client?

    Phoenix the browser or the database?

    Mozilla the browser or ,er , neverimind.

  9. Warning bells. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd thought the name sounded familiar.

    Isn't this the same Steve Bennett who was planning to launch his X-prize rocket on what amounted to the same kind of engines used by the high-power model rocket community, despite the community trying to tell him that they wouldn't scale the way he wants them to? The guy who was prevented from doing further launch tests because he set the firing range he was using on fire? The guy who was ripped apart in the last three articles about him for not having an adequate understanding of what he's doing?

    This does not bode well for his scheduled launch attempt.

    1. Re:Warning bells. by Centurion509 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those incidents you refer to were all several years ago. Starchaser has definitely improved its reputation since then, for its three recent major accomplishments in the last 24 months have all been positive:
      37-ft. Nova rocket blasts off!
      Churchill liquid engine test success
      Nova II capsule test drop success
      The next few months will be very exciting. Starchaser plans to integrate all three of the above accomplishments in one project: the manned launch of the Nova rocket -- outfitted with the new Churchill engines -- carrying the Nova II capsule as payload!

  10. Re:Launch Date? by twostar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1.) You can get insurance for anything, the Premiums may be a little high though.

    2.) They aren't going into orbit so there is no way to get stuck. It's a simple projectile trajectory, up and down like a cannon ball.

    3.) That's the point of the X-Prize.

    4.) We can only hope!

  11. economics of rewarding by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it really easier to design and build a craft to take you 100 miles above the earth and return safely than it is to track down Saddam?

    You get 35 million for Saddam, only 10 million for turning into a shooting star.

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    1. Re:economics of rewarding by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

      1 ... capture Sadman.
      2 ... borrow WMD/scud from Sadman.
      3 ... use WMD/scud to win x-prize.
      4 ... profit $45,000,000

      Sadman would make a good test 'pilot'. (no need for a chute) :-)

      --
      siggy played guitar
  12. optimistic & redundant by madpierre · · Score: 3, Funny

    The name Starchaser is a bit optimistic.
    How about ... LEOlimper.

    So far all they've done is chuck it off the back of a plane.

    Anyway to get the 10 megabucks the thing only has to be

    capable of launching three people into space.

    No mention of gettin em back :-) so a parachute is somewhat redundant.

    Now where can i find three volunteers????

    --
    siggy played guitar
  13. looming disaster? by fihzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it's one thing for a little team to build a narrow electric car where the government spent billions and failed, but another entirely to do sub orbital flights where the resources of NASA are still not enough to prevent tragedies like the shuttle accidents. Serious life loss is surely imminent, but the most ironic thing of all is that even if some people do make it up and down again, it can surely never lead to actual orbital flights as the engineering and physics problems associated with getting in an out of the atmosphere really do need astronomical resources to solve?

    Being from the little town where Bennet is from

    1. Re:looming disaster? by thaig · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You can't say that its

      • a) too unambitious because it's suborbital and
      • b) too difficult for anyone to attempt even 41 years after Gargarin went up in his big firework
      at the same time. Which argument are you going to choose?
      --
      This is all just my personal opinion.
  14. Thunderbird Project is moving along quite nicely by FrankoBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    In fact, five prototypes have already been used for quite a while now.

  15. My money's still on Rutan by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My money is still on the Rutan boys and their Scaled Composites entry.

    They're the only ones who have shown credible progress in respect to actually getting a craft flying towards the heavens. Most of the other X-Prize entrants are either playing with models or dreaming :-)

  16. ram those foils .. by savuporo · · Score: 2, Informative

    For people who had somequestion mark in place of "ram-air parafoils.."

    "ram-air parafoils" are nothing but a regular recantgular parachute canopies that are used every day in regular skydiving sports ( ive used one exactly 33 times and its been working like charm :) )

    It flies like a regular airplane wing, just that the lifting profile isnt fixed. The wing is "open" in front, and the airflow makes the wing "rigid". Thats the general principle anyways. You steer it with pulling the "brakes" on one or other side of the wing, "brakes" are simply the after left and right parts of the wing, that can be pulled down via "steering ropes".
    The one that Starchaser is using is obviously somewhat larger than your average skydiver canopy. Beginners canopies measure up to 240sq ft and are rated for average 80-kg person. So if NOVA capsule weighs 250kg+pilot, the canopy must be at least three-four times larger.

    And now some general X-Prize remarks. For anyone who is still not getting it: X-prize is not directly aimed at replacing Soyuzes and Shuttles, so none of the contenders is going to orbit, just a suborbital "hop" to 100km's of altitude. Why 100 ? Because thats where internationally agreed boundaries of space begin at. So X-prize passengers will officially be astronauts, the league up until now open to select few of government employees
    X-prize and its followup X-prize Cup ( a "rocket NASCAR" ) are hoped to revolutize the private spaceflight industry.

    hint: X-prize has its own messageboards @ http://www.xprize.org/messageboard that could actually use some slashdotting.

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!