Slashdot Mirror


snopes.com's David Mikkelson Interviewed

pipingguy writes "Online Journalism Review interviews David Mikkelson of the Urban Legends Reference Pages. While the Internet has taken its share of knocks for helping scammers perpetrate e-mail and Web hoaxes (the Bambi hunt reportedly was staged to sell videos on the proprietor's Web site), not enough credit is given to the folks who are using the Internet to debunk them. Snopes.com is the work of the husband-and-wife team of David and Barbara Mikkelson, who have taken their passion for urban myths to the Web since 1995."

10 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. uhhh by gfody · · Score: 5, Funny

    holy animated gifs and midi soundtracks.. snopes.com looks like my mom's first website

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
  2. LINUX for the DESKTOP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    DEFINATELY an URBAN LEGEND.

  3. What about the Liberal Media? by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm still trying to find that channel. I'd love to see it.

    Really.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  4. most important statement by AbdullahHaydar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from the interview:

    MG: "What about the role of the Internet in hoaxes?"

    DM: "I think in general, nothing's changed but the technology. There's a lot on the Internet that you can't trust. But frankly, there's a lot on your bookshelf and the library shelves that you can't trust either. There are books on UFOs and alien encounters that require some examination. There's never been a medium that you could inherently trust. You still have to look at who's telling you this and why are they telling you this. Is there anything else they should be telling you? That concept hasn't changed. The Internet has made it easier to debunk hoaxes while at the same time making it easier to perpetrate them. Nothing's really changed but the technology."

    The only other thing he could have mentioned is that people trust TV news and newspapers way too much also. 'nuff said.

    --


    Suicide Booth: You are now dead! Thank you for using Stop and Drop, America's favorite since 2008.
  5. hmm by wiggys · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Snopes.com is the work of the husband-and-wife team of David and Barbara Mikkelson, who have taken their passion for urban myths to the Web since 1995."

    Or so they would have us believe... what if Snopes is a secret CIA plot to spread deliberate disinformation (the same CIA which is run by Masonic Lizards who would love nothing better than to enslare the world's population using advanced psychic mind-control tactics)

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    1. Re:hmm by PakProtector · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, stop spreading such disinformation.

      Anyone who's in the know knows that the Masonic Lizards are just a front for the secret organization of International Bartenders.
      Bartenders are the most powerful people in the world! Just think about it. I've told many deep, dark secrets to bartenders! They must know absolutely everything!

      Even now, they sit in their secret base, plotting the overthrow of the world's governments, using those same governments' leaders as their willing dupes!


      Of course... I could be crazy.



      Where's the +1 Paranoid mod?

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

  6. Nostradamus prediction. by questamor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or the false nostradamus prediction, debunked on snopes.com:

    In the City of God there will be a great thunder,
    Two brothers torn apart by Chaos,
    while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb,
    The third big war will begin when the big city is burning.
    *NOSTRADAMUS 1654


    Written by a student to show how vague prophecies can be misinterpreted easily. Popped up after Sept11... now applies only a couple of years later to Uday and Qusay Hussein.

    Just thought that curious :)

  7. My problem with Snopes.com by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I read one of their articles debunking the myth that Marilyn Monroe had six toes. The only issue I had with it was one of their "counterproofs":
    There is no record of Marilyn's having had an operation at that point in her life, and no contemporary references to anyone's noticing her walking with a bandaged foot or a limp for a period of time. (One doesn't simply get up and start trotting around after having a toe removed -- the missing digit affects one's balance, and it takes some time to adjust to the change and "relearn" how to walk.)

    The problem is that according to my wife, a podiatric (foot) surgeon, the recovery period following a phalangectomy (ampution of a toe (or finger)) is almost nil. The big toe, let alone a vestigial "pinky toe", is not crucial for balance or stability. You can verify this yourself; lift up your big toe and walk around. Bet you can still do it, can't you? Sure you can, especially if you're wearing a shoe with a sole that is even moderately stiff, which would replace some of the big toe's stabilizing influence.

    I reported this via the Snopes.com comment form. After a couple of days, I received a reply that basically said "everyone knows you can't walk right if you have a toe cut off", and my wife's qualified medical opinion was pretty much ignored. Now, I really don't think that Marilyn Monroe had six toes. However, I stand by my assertion that at least one of the reasons they give opposing such an idea just doesn't work.

    Why do I think that's important? Because I don't know anything at all about a lot of the subjects that they speak authoritatively about. Since I know of at least one topic where they discarded the opinion of a subject matter expert, I have no reason to believe that they haven't done so elsewhere.

    An old saying, paraphrased, is that "the news is accurate, except for the parts you personally know about", and I now kind of feel the same way about Snopes.com. I agree with a lot of their findings, but I have to take it all with a grain of salt.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  8. Re:Television show. by Burpmaster · · Score: 5, Funny
    I remember reading that Snopes: The TV Show was in development but I never heard anything about it again. I was looking forward to that.

    That was just an urban legend.

  9. you know what amuses me... by Montag2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know how many times I have referred my friends to snopes.com after hearing them recite to me an urban legend. Their response to me is "you believe this crap? You can't believe everything you read on the internet!"