Slashdot Mirror


SCO "Disappointed" by Red Hat Lawsuit

schmidt349 writes "SCO has issued a preliminary response to Red Hat's lawsuit, in which President and CEO Darl McBride advises that SCO will prepare a "legal response" to Red Hat's requests for injunctive relief. In addition, he promises that the countersuit that SCO will file may include "counterclaims for copyright infringement and conspiracy." His final statement-- that Red Hat's "decision to file legal action does not seem conducive to the long-term survivability of Linux--" is chilling in light of the business strategy that SCO has adopted in its sales of UnixWare licenses to actual and potential users of the Linux kernel."

6 of 778 comments (clear)

  1. It does sound a bit weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I think Red Hat might be bending to popular internet pressure on this one. I mean, quite a few successful businesses pay royalties for many of their technologies. Is Red Hat so immature they can't handle a buck here or there? They're supposed to be a business.

  2. hahahahha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    SCO should die. like, now.

  3. Re:Know what would be really funny? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mod me flamebait all you want.

    I still want to know what everyone is going to do if it turns out SCO is right.

    And its a definate possibility, considering the linux community has no respect for IP laws in general, and IBM has no respect for fair business practices.

    So far all the linux community can defend itself with is name-calling.

    Let the good times roll.

    Or, how about this scenario? IBM settles out of court, admitting guilt. They license - and now own for all intents and purposes - linux.

    Eventually, one way or another, linux will be declared some corporations property. It's guaranteed. The more valuable it becomes, the harder people will fight and the more tricks they will use to make sure it does not remain free.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  4. Re:good faith discussions by missing000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Or, how about setting your money on fire and praying that Thor strike SCO down?

    I think that may be almost as effective.

    Give your money to linux vendors when you want support. If you want to fight SCO, just make sure you donate to the EFF and any legal funds established to fight this FUD.

    I think giving money to starving distributions just to fight this is stupid. I like to reward companies for things they do which benefit me. A lawsuit seeking damages due to slander will in no way benefit me or any other non-Red Hat shareholder.

    Just my 2 cents.

  5. Re:good faith discussions by buysse · · Score: 0, Troll
    Many /. readers seem to think that "polish == pretty-graphical-config-tools". Incorrect.

    --
    -30-
  6. Forget this crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    It's time to start shooting Mormons and buring their god dammed churches down. The Mormons are responsible for this crap. They have had the chance to stop it. They haven't. So fuck all Mormons. They are lower than dirt. Uath sucks wipe it off the map. Screw class action, screw the rigged courts. It's time for militant action!

    (this is a joke for the clueless and humorless)