RIM Loses NTP Case, To Pay $53 Million
theodp writes "A judge has ruled in favor of holding company NTP in its patent-infringement case against BlackBerry maker Research In Motion, awarding monetary damages and fees of $53.7 million and granting an injunction preventing RIM from making, using, or offering to sell handhelds, services or software in the U.S. until the date of expiration of NTP's patents, the latest of which is May 20, 2012. The court then stayed that injunction, pending an appeal by the Canadian company."
If you became employed by Research In Motion, would that be a RIM Job?
I have patented the process of setting up and running a company in the us. Now all must bow down before me.
I was afraid my clocks would drift hopelessly.
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
Hasn't the RIAA/MPAA/Government taught us ANYTHING?
It is NOT patent *infringement*. It is patent/intellectual property *THEFT*. It's no better than PIRATING..
To call this "patent infringement" is to not do honor to the hard work of patent attorneys and offices around the world!
But their earnings just took a RIM shot. (Ack! I should be ashamed of myself). -- MA
Cases like this make me finally realize what is meant by "patently obvious". It means its as obvious and inevitable as patentable technology.