Maryland Plans Code Review for Voting Software
asmithmd1 writes "We already knew Diebold software is insecure, now the Baltimore Sun is reporting that the Governor of Maryland has asked SAIC to review the software in Diebold voting machines. Diebold has graciously allowed SAIC access to their proprietary code. Why isn't this code open source by law?" In a related story, a trade show for closed-source electronic voting systems is doing their best to keep critics out. Update: 08/07 15:23 GMT by M : Diebold's website security is less than outstanding.
your vote has caused a fatal exception in kernel32.dll - try picking another option
Independant hopefull Kevin Mitnick was elected President of the 2004 elections.
.sig
"If electronic voting becomes the norm (likely), I just won't vote."
The odds are already heavily against your voting currently anyway, so I don't see how this will matter much.
At least we don't use the "Telelection" methodology a'la Max Headroom...
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Heh, guess we could teach all voters to type "./configure; make; make clean"
...
Word Axis
GW Bush: -234,524 votes
Troll4x0r: 538 votes
Howard Dean: 864,234,234 votes
Natalie Portman: 784,245 votes