Slashdot Mirror


Disclosure of Major Software Exploits by Students?

school-hacker asks: "I am a U.S. university student who has recently come across 2 remote exploits for a homework program used by colleges nationwide. Both vulnerabilities allow students to give themselves arbitrary scores, and possibly execute arbitrary code. To further emphasize the scope of this vulnerability, I have written and -selftested proof-of-concept exploit code. Naturally, I want to share this information with their software engineers, and would even be nice enough and suggest a means to fixing it. However, with the state of current intellectual property and reverse-engineering laws, I hesitate to do so out of fear of litigation or academic disciplinary action. As an ethical geek, what do -you- do?" While the responses from an earlier story might prove useful, here, there is always the possibility of the university making things harder for the person reporting the problem. How can students avoid both legal and academic trouble, when trying to notify their university of security problems?

1 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. Missing part by hsa · · Score: 0, Troll

    .. I wouldn't like my name to be published, because my grades would drop significantly.

    By releasing these exploits, I am merely getting rid of any competition - people get suspicious, when many students get very good grades.

    Best parts I will still be keeping to myself, excluding the backdoor I've written in the proof-of-concept code.