Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

FSF's Opinion of the Apple Public Source License

Posted by michael on from the thumbs-down dept.

Stian Engen writes "Bradley Kuhn of the FSF does not recommend the release of new software using the Apple Public Source License (APSL) 2.0 despite its newly accuired Free Software License."

2 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. This is not true anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    Ahem:
    The problems described in this page are still potential issues for other possible licenses, but they do not apply to version 2.0 of the APSL.
  2. Remember Ogg Vorbis? by dido · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ahem. The FSF actually recommended that the Ogg Vorbis toolkit remain under a BSD license, rather than insisting that it go GPL. This was all done, apparently, with Richard M. Stallman's blessing! Yes folks, RMS actually encouraged the Xiphophorous people to use the BSD license rather than the GPL! The story here.

    In response to the change of license, Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation says, "I agree. It is wise to make some of the Ogg Vorbis code available for use in proprietary software, so that commercial companies doing proprietary software will use it, and help Vorbis succeed in competition with other formats that would be restricted against our use."

    No, the FSF does not recommend exclusive use of the GPL at all times. They can encourage use of other more permissive free licenses if they believe that it will aid the cause of Free Software.

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.