Slashdot Mirror


One Last New Episode of Futurama

Ant writes "Futurama's last new episode airs tonight at 7:00 PM on Fox." If you're missing your fix, there's a Futurama website with entirely too much Futurama info.

30 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. Subscriber bastards! by stevens · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One comment's up and already the gotfuturama.com site's down.

    I'm sorry to see Futurama go. It started getting really funny, and I will use "Bite my shiny metal ass" in response to silly feature requests for many years.

    I bought the first episode DVDs already. *Sigh* and I will buy the rest when they come out...

  2. What is there to say? by orkysoft · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Futurama was without a doubt the greatest and funniest tv series I have ever seen. I'm also not surprised about the amount of Futurama quotes I see in sigs here on Slashdot. Check my friends list, most of them have them :-)

    Bite my shiny metal... OH NOOO!

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:What is there to say? by capt.Hij · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you if restricted to the first season, when it was wonderful, but after that it got stale. I still like the Simpsons better. Even Homer has (d)evolved and is still funny. The characters on Futurama haven't changed since the first season, and they haven't found their niche.

      I do not go out of my way to see it. When I do see it, I chuckle and enjoy it, but I'm not going to go out of my way (i.e. go upstairs away from the terminal) to see it. It isn't worth wrestling the remote out of the death grip of anybody else in the family, and I probaly won't shell out the bucks for the DVD.

    2. Re:What is there to say? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suppose it depends on how you percieve it. For me, the Simpsons had its day years ago.. I don't even bother watching the new episodes any more because they've completely run out of ideas (there's only so far you can push the 'homer is stupid, lisa is neglected, and bart should be in care' line). It was all very two dimensional, since it had to reflect the boring life of a power plant worker each week (one who never actually to work, except in a couple of episodes.. no wonder he was trying to drink himself to death).

      OTOH Futurama had a lot further to go, because they could introduce new ideas each episode... no preconcieved ideas of what was possible and plenty of B-movies to do parodies of.

  3. Sad.. by OmniVector · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Futurama (made by Matt Groening) was a lot better than Simpsons ever was. Though i'm sure that will start a holy war.

    The simspsons was geared a lot towards children usually, where I always felt Futurama was more for adults (Any one remember the death by snu-snu joke in the amazon woman episode?)

    Oh well, just another shining example of how Fox knows how to cancel the best shows: Now i've lost my family guy AND futurama fix :(

    --
    - tristan
    1. Re:Sad.. by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh geez....

      There are a bunch of things wrong with your post, but I'll stick to one that you should understand. Here's what you wrote:

      "Oh well, just another shining example of how Fox knows how to cancel the best shows: Now i've lost my family guy AND futurama fix :("

      The thing about this is that Fox actually approved/funded/aired these shows in the first place. Fox is far from perfect, I'm no fanboy, but the other big networks don't tolerate stuff like Family Guy and Futurama. Fox stuck with the show through four years of poor ratings, and with Family Guy through three years or so of dismal ratings.

      Fox is a business. They need to maximize profits. That aside, the fact that they take risks on shows like these is good for us, because occasionally, the quirky show turns out to be a money maker.

    2. Re:Sad.. by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The thing about this is that Fox actually approved/funded/aired these shows in the first place. Fox is far from perfect, I'm no fanboy, but the other big networks don't tolerate stuff like Family Guy and Futurama.

      Fox certainly is willing to take risks other networks don't... That is how it works if you want people to watch your fourth banana network. Imagine how hard it is to get good shows if you're a fifth or sixth banana, like UPN/WB are? However, part of taking risks is knowing that you sometimes have to STICK WITH IT for a while, and not just by not cancelling it.
      Fox stuck with the show through four years of poor ratings, and with Family Guy through three years or so of dismal ratings.

      Fox did more to sabotage that show than they did to help it. (Many television networks are guilty of this, not just Fox. See also "Ed" on NBC.) First, they changed timeslots over and over and over again so that even people who already KNEW the show was good never knew when to tune in. Frequent timeslot changes had more to do with Family Guy not finding a big audience in first run. The show should be on where "Malcolm in the Middle" is now, and Malcolm should be slinging shakes at Mc Donald's.

      Contrast this with Cartoon Network, where Family Guy beat Jay Leno AND David Letterman COMBINED in the 18-34 demographic several evenings in July. How did this happen? They picked a good time, put it on, left it there, and promoted it. Amazingly enough people watch.

      This is both extraordinary and revolutionary... [/sarcasm]
      --
      Who did what now?
    3. Re:Sad.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Futurama was shown for four years, of which for three it was put in a time slot where it'd be pre-empted by continually overrunning sports programmes for most of the year - Fox saw it as quality filler, not as a program to built an audience for.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Sad.. by ctr2sprt · · Score: 5, Insightful
      My impression of the Futurama situation is that the show wasn't canceled because of lack of money or viewers, but instead because of politics. Apparently Groening got a much better contract this time around, which allowed him not just to keep greater control of the show, but also take home more of the profits from it. Groening, at least, believes that Fox are resentful of that and so have tried to keep the show moderately, but not highly, successful. So they keep stuffing it into timeslots where they know it will be preempted, not advertising it at all, and so on. Keep in mind that despite this screwing the show's ratings were pretty much in line with King of the Hill, a more mainstream show in a better timeslot. I have no idea if this is still the case, but it was back when Fox made the decision not to get any more Futurama episodes.

      I don't have a problem with Fox canceling shows that nobody watches. (I don't like it, but hey, it happens.) My problem is that they didn't seem to give Futurama a chance after the first season. It's honestly like they were trying to kill it, and many people close to the situation say that's exactly what was happening.

  4. Sigh... by rbullo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it that the good shows never last? For example, Family Guy was hilarious, but Fox cancelled it because advertisers were reluctant to run ads on such an edgy show. Now they are taking down Futurama, which is consistently funnier than this newest season of The Simpsons. And shows like King of the Hill, of which only the first season was funny to me, is still going strong. And don't get me started on that prime-time soap opera known as Friends.

    --
    OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
    1. Re:Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it that the good shows never last?

      Because nothing does.

    2. Re:Sigh... by Ecko_viLAn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      becuase the general public doesn't like having to think to get a laugh, the simpsons stoped being funny about two years ago for me, and king of the hill just hasn't been great at all. Futurama and Family guy are still goign strong in the humor and substance area for me, will just have to go out and buy the dvds of them.

      --
      If we don't end war, War will end us. - H.G. Wells
    3. Re:Sigh... by utd-blaze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can respect that you dont think king of the hill is funny. Different people have different tastes in comedy, but understand that king of the hill is a quality show. I have never seen a tv show capture the look, feel, and soul of a community the way that king of the hill portrays alren (arlen is a psuedonym for garland, a dallas suburb). Anyone from the area will tell you that king of the hill is not a comedy, its a documentary.

      --
      Do me a favor and double it!
    4. Re:Sigh... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, but they didn't give Futurama a change. After the first season, it kept being pre-empted by NFL games. After a while, even I stopped trying to watch it because instead there would be a post-game interview or something. When a station does something like that, there's no way a show can get good ratings. Because it's either not on when it's supposed to be, or people give up trying to watch it.

    5. Re:Sigh... by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      king of the hill is a quality show.

      I second that, and am constantly amazed that Mike Judge (creator of Beavis and Butthead) managed to make such a good family-oriented show, which several times has brought a tear to my eye. Very well-written, although obviously catering to a different audience. Not always funny (but Dale is hilarious), but very touching.

      Heh, heh. He said "touching."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:Sigh... by Kenshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not always "out in the open" funny. Part of the comedy of the show is knowing the charcaters' attitudes and reactions to things.

      One of the funniest moments of the show was when Buckley broke up with Luanne. Hank was tired of listening to her, and gave her the advice that "sometimes it's just better to bottle up your emotions instead of letting them out".

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  5. Indeed a sad, sad day. by rvcrazy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, this was my first thought when I awoke this morning. I suppose we can all only be thankful that Fox now has more room in their schedule for "reality" shows, When Car Chasing High-Speed Animals are Attacked by Couples Married by America, and some other nonsense about objects removed from people in emergency rooms.

    I truly am disgusted with television, and really only look forward to The Simpsons and B5 reruns. I can't see anything coming up that remotely appeals to me.

  6. Fox network is a joke by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least now they'll have thirty more minutes available for more lowbrow, idiot level programming... Good thing. People might start to think that the networks were actually trying to provide good entertainment in exchange for all of that publicly owned broadcast spectrum they've been granted exclusive use of for the last 75 or so years. Maybe it is time to take that spectrum back?

    After all, those licenses were granted to provide a broadcast service "in the public interest", but when was the last time you saw something on TV that wasn't crap? You could even argue that the majority of commercial broadcasting actually makes people more stupid. That can't POSSIBLY be in the public's interest.

    PBS has some good stuff, maybe History Channel, but what else? Along the same lines, when was the last time you heard a radio program (besides NPR) that wasn't the same recycled viagra jokes/top 40 playlist as every other station on the dial? Granted, Clear Channel is making plenty of money, but what about the public, the people the broadcaster's were entrusted to serve?

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Fox network is a joke by bnenning · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Granted, Clear Channel is making plenty of money, but what about the public, the people the broadcaster's were entrusted to serve?


      Clear Channel, Fox, et al are making money precisely because the public voluntarily chooses their programming.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    2. Re:Fox network is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Clear Channel, Fox, et al are making money precisely because the public voluntarily chooses their programming.

      Oh I'm sorry perhaps you could suggest some alternative programming to voluntarily watch/listen to. What's that? All you can suggest is AM radio and PBS, give me a break. Television / radio are the mosta powerful mediums on earth and I just don't think a massive boycott is anyway to improve quality.

  7. I never got this by X-Nc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I guess it's just me but I never found Futurama or the Simpsons or any of the like to be even slightly entertaining. Same with South Park. It's not just the cartoons, just about everything on TV lately sucks. I know that TV got the nickname "Boob Tube" not for it's intellecual content. But why must the intellegance level go down year after year?

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  8. Re:Mirror by TC+(WC) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's being a bit of a jerk to bypass a measure they've obviously put in place to avoid horrible rape by the slashot hordes. :(

  9. A victim of Fox by SoVi3t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, like Family Guy, Futurama fell victim of Fox's scheduling stupidity. Family Guy was put up against Fraiser, and Futurama got bumped around, cancelled by football, and so much worse. Both of them ultimately lost many viewers due to these blunders. If Fox was intelligent, they would have put it on right after The Simpsons, and moved Malcolm in the Middle to some other day. That way fans of the Simpsons could watch Futurama afterwards, in a sort of Groening Hour of Power.

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  10. Re:sad but by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " but for some reason it never had that "must see the next episode now" magic. "

    For me it was because Fox kept pre-empting it for football. That and the 7pm time-slot was actually kind of hard to catch. Simpsons had me programmed to be ready at 8. Man I was addicted to that show when it was on right after the Simpsons.

    What really bugged me was that they showed Star Wars one Sunday at 5pm. Futurama would normally have been on at 7pm, following Star Wars. Seems like a pretty damn good lineup, dontcha think? Nope. We got two eps of King of the Hill that day.

    I can understand that Futurama didn't do it for ya, but I feel rather strongly that Fox really blew it when it came to giving Futurama a chance to develop a strong audience.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  11. Re:sad but by lightsaber1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I agree...FOX has to be THE worst network for scheduling consistency. The only thing you know for sure is when Simpsons is, well, except when they move it to 7:00 so they can show a movie at 8...between that and the endless commercials, it's ridiculous.

    FOX has some really good shows, and some really lousy shows, unfortunately they seem to focus more on pumping out a lot of lousy shows rather than focusing on the really good ones. Simpsons has taken a significant downturn in the last few years (since reality tv came out...coincidence? maybe). They seem to have gotten better this last season, but seasons 12 and 13 were really quite pathetic. They've also had several really good shows (imho) that they just didn't care about and dropped because nobody was watching or whatever -- except it was impossible to tell when the shows would be on...no wonder. Futurama and Family Guy both fit into this category.

    Let's just hope they don't blow it with their next good idea...and enough with the reality crap people! If I wanted reality, I'd go out...TV is supposed to be a break from reality.

  12. Alternate Market by Seek_1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, a couple of people have stated that the reason Family Guy got cancelled was because no advertisers wanted it. And obviously from reading this thread and from the petition site, there are hundreds of thousands of Futurama fans out there.

    Do you think it would be realistic for them to continue making the series directly to DVD?

    Think about it. I know that I along with most of my friends either own, or are planning to own all of the Family Guy/Futurama DVDs in addition to having downloaded copies of the shows beforehand (and they say piracy is killing the industry.. pfft!).

    I'd be more than happy to keep buying (yes, that's right.. spending actual $$$) seasons of Futurama and Family Guy if they went straight to DVD.

    Actually, I've probably only managed to catch Family Guy being aired maybe half a dozen times, and Futurama not much more than that. I think that for shows (like these) where there is great demand, but not really a spot in the lineup, marketting straight to DVD should (if they were smart) be a valid alternative.

  13. Re:sad but by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know the whole "Jump the Shark" thing is overdone, but with the Simpsons, I can point to exactly the moment when the show jumped for me.

    It was when the doctors found Homer was stupid because he had a crayon jammed in his brain. Removing it made him smart, but there was a difficult period of adjustment, so at the end of the episode, he put the crayon back.

    That's not funny. That's f*&cking tragic and depressing.

  14. Re:sad but by Luigi30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You forgot the prayer. "101100011011001010...2"

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
  15. Re:X-Bender by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Moderators, take note: the parent post is referring to the title of a Futurama episode and is therefore topical. If you don't see the humor, please have your hilarity unit tested asap.

  16. Re:sad but by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I finally realized that Fox was actively trying to kill Futurama when they pre-empted the show for post game football. I just hope the newer episodes make their way onto Comedy Central.