Embedded Systems Study Rebutted
Gabba writes "LinuxDevices.com has a rebuttal to the Microsoft-funded report purporting to show Windows nearly 4X more efficient than Linux for developing embedded systems. The rebuttal shows the study to be full of flaws in both design and execution."
Excuse me? Slashdot unbiased? Oh well, whatever you say,... Care to invest in a sailing trip around zwitserland?
> by-enlarge
:-)
You've been reading too many spams. The correct expression is "by and large".
/ \
\ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
x
/ \
Linux-biased study finds that Microsoft-biased study was full of shit. Anti-Microsoft-Biased readers of Slashdot agree. Film at eleven.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
The report was full of "flaws in both design and execution"? Maybe it was done by the same teams that ordinarily are involved with their products?
Microsoft says Windows better than Linux! Linux advocates disagree!
In other news, a communist revolution has shaken Russia, and Napoleon suffered a shocking defeat at Waterloo.
Cheers
-b
"Have you ever heard of user error?" - Bill Gates
Ozzy is user error, folks.
"Facts Schmacks, you can use facts to prove anything!"
The study goes on to prove that the concept of "friendly competition", which surprisingly many other companies follow, benefits end users the most.
I've heard this many times before. Of course, I work at a University so perhaps there's a subtle difference.
I'm not quite sure what the iDrive is, but I read a story about the malaysian financial minister. He was going to a meeting in a brand new BMW, with computer driven everything. Suddenly, the embedded computer crashed which caused the doors to lock without a way to open them. Same for the windows and the hole in the roof.
As it was 200+ degrees fahrenheit, he was almost cooked before a maintenance man managed to smash the bullet proof windows with a sledge.
How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
>> by-enlarge
:-)
>You've been reading too many spams. The correct expression is "by and large".
Shouldn't it be buy-enlarge?