Slashdot Mirror
Embedded Systems Study Rebutted
Gabba writes "LinuxDevices.com has a rebuttal to the Microsoft-funded report purporting to show Windows nearly 4X more efficient than Linux for developing embedded systems. The rebuttal shows the study to be full of flaws in both design and execution."
frosty piss, boys!
But this story about the RIAA losing in court does not? Seems this is rather predictable (gosh, a MS study biased and flawed!), but the RIAA losing is an important change.
Suck my balls.
I can't think of anything else to say.
I talk bad about the moderators, and I get modded down OVERRATED!
If this continues, I will shitstorm (crapflood) this thread.
How the *fuck* did this get to +4?
Something like this is too obvious to take any space on slashdot. We all know Microsoft wants to defame Linux with any 'report' they try to pull.
The reason why its not worthy of mention is because theres a whole slew of embedded manufacturers using Linux or trying to use Linux and not Windows CE. We know how many arches CE runs on and how reliably. We've seen the evaluation packs of ARM7TDMI and ARM720T based chips that allow the running of Linux and companies like QT bringing packages for development on Linux.
In this regard alone, Linux is the monopolist and Microsoft the underdog. If they get a little reactive it surprises noone and neither do them lying. Most of the comments for this post will be of the sarcastic 'no kidding!' kind.
"Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
Who the hell modded this troll? What is trollish about this?
Honey, I shrunk the Cygwin