Slashdot Mirror


A Look at the Upcoming GNOME 2.4

JanneM writes "Gnome 2.4 is arriving early september. Sayamindu Dasgupta has installed the 2.3.5 development release to see what's in store, and has written a very nice overview of the upcoming release." Update: 08/14 16:06 GMT by M : The author has provided a mirror.

12 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    ps. gnome is 4 fag0rtz. kthx bai.

  2. Gnome is for M$ ass-kissers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Like M$ .NET shit ?
    Want to support a company which supports it ?
    No, then boycott Gnome and its lame support for .NET. Real men don't touch that crap.

  3. Really ?! by invalid_argument · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Who cares?

    Please give me a very bad score for this post

  4. KDE is WAY ahead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    I mean, they're already at 3.1!

    Let's get with the program, Gnome!

  5. Re:Nautilus? by Daengbo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Well, it does a lot of stuff... you might not use it all, but it's there.
    That's why I went to the less able ROX-filer
    RTFM? Try "gnome-cd-properties". This isn't nautilus' fault in the first place.
    Since I'm not using it in Gnome, I didn't think to read the Gnome pages, but I did read the info on Nautilus
    Then you haven't really closed it now, have you? What do you think is managing your desktop? If you don't like it, there's always KDE, or TWM if you'd prefer...
    Well, I had thought that I was using icewm, and that if I wanted to browse some files, I could use nautilus, but I was wrong. Nautilus takes over the whole desktop, placing icons. Again, the reason I went to ROX, so I didn't have to deal with having some monstrous program taking over my desktop just to browse the filesystem and launch files.
    Finally:
    You haven't really answered my questions, now have you, nor did the article. I am honestly curious. I would like to see a Gnome that is less heavy on resources. Is that happening?

  6. Re:slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Your mother sucks my dick Karma Whore

  7. Re:On-the-fly Resolution Change by wyndigo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    umm. ctrl-alt-(+|-) are your friend. Unless you secretly like leaving X to change resolutions.

    --wyn

  8. Re:Nautilus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    FYI the amount of RAM doesn't increase like that in my Windows 98, which is also immune to the Blaster Worm.
    Yeah, too bad Red Hat 9 is so buggy and insecure that it allow exploits like that.
  9. Re:CTRL ALT +/- anyone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Because it doesn't actually change the resolutions you fucking asshat! All it does is change the virtual window at which you are still looking at the highest resolution. Then you get that stupid scrolling desktop that moves every time you hit the edge of your virtual window. NOBODY uses a desktop like that! Fucking stupid asshat motherfucker! Windows 95 had that ability to change color depth and reslution, why can't you fucking Lunix tards get it right!!? After all it's almost eight years since Windows 95 came out and you're still fiddling with that retarded Ctrl +/- feature like it's new or something! I am seething with hate for fools like you! You need to learn something about computers before you go spouting off crap like this. God I HATE you!!!

  10. Re:Nautilus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Buy some more RAM and get on with life

    That my friend is one of the stupidest goddamn things I've ever read on slashdot and that's saying something.

    This is antecdotal evidence to be sure but everyone I've ever been around (large comp sci department at a big goddamn uni) that has used Nautilus even on machines with 1GB or more of memory hates it. Nay, fucking hates it.
    Why? Because it's slow as christmas.
    They usually run KDE or fluxbox or something like it. Slow bloated shit will get you nowhere.

    I wonder if you work for crucial or if you code bloated pig software?

  11. Re:GLOBAL Always On Top functionality? by leviramsey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Uh... sawfish (which was part of GNOME from the early days until Havoc Pennington hijacked GNOME and made metacity the default wm), which should still be usable with GNOME (I used it for a while with GNOME 2.2 until I had a RAM module fail and GNOME got dog-slow) allows you to adjust the stacking of windows to achieve always on top.

    This is far from a new feature (though it may be new to metacity, the shittiest excuse for a window manager since twm).

    BRING BACK SAWFISH! BRING BACK SAWFISH!

  12. Re:Nautilus Useable? by xjerky · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ahhh, gconf....since everyone loves the Windows registry, lets give Unix one too.......

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."