Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Smartphone 2003 SDK Released

cd_Csc writes "Microsoft's long awaited Smartphone 2003 SDK was released today. This free download is critical milestone for the Smartphone platform. For the first time, developers are now able to use the .NET Compact Framework to write Smartphone applications using Visual Studio. At Smartphone Thoughts, we have listed the details of what's new in the 2003 SDK along with some screen shots of enhancements to the Inbox and Internet Explorer applications."

5 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. First "It's damned late" post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's damned late.

  2. hmm by narkotix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah but does it run linux??

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  3. why is this interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    why do i care about this?

    WHY
    WHY
    WHY?

  4. Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs. Discontinuity
    Peter Lynds1
    Time, Classical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, Indeterminacy, Discontinuity, Relativity,
    Cosmology, Imaginary Time, Chronons, Zenos Paradoxes.
    It is postulated there is not a precise static instant in time underlying a dynamical physical process at which
    the relative position of a body in relative motion or a specific physical magnitude would theoretically be
    precisely determined. It is concluded it is exactly because of this that time (relative interval as indicated by a
    clock) and the continuity of a physical process is possible, with there being a necessary trade off of all
    precisely determined physical values at a time, for their continuity through time. This explanation is also
    shown to be the correct solution to the motion and infinity paradoxes, excluding the Stadium, originally
    conceived by the ancient Greek mathematician Zeno of Elea. Quantum Cosmology, Imaginary Time and
    Chronons are also then discussed, with the latter two appearing to be superseded on a theoretical basis.
    1. Introduction
    Time enters mechanics as a measure of interval, relative to the clock completing the measurement.
    Conversely, although it is generally not realized, in all cases a time value indicates an interval of time,
    rather than a precise static instant in time at which the relative position of a body in relative motion or a
    specific physical magnitude would theoretically be precisely determined. For example, if two separate
    events are measured to take place at either 1 hour or 10.00 seconds, these two values indicate the events
    occurred during the time intervals of 1 and 1.99999hours and 10.00 and 10.0099999seconds,
    respectively. If a time measurement is made smaller and more accurate, the value comes closer to an
    accurate measure of an interval in time and the corresponding parameter and boundary of a specific
    physical magnitudes potential measurement during that interval, whether it be relative position,
    momentum, energy or other. Regardless of how small and accurate the value is made however, it cannot
    indicate a precise static instant in time at which a value would theoretically be precisely determined,
    because there is not a precise static instant in time underlying a dynamical physical process. If there were,
    all physical continuity, including motion and variation in all physical magnitudes would not be possible,
    as they would be frozen static at that precise instant, remaining that way. Subsequently, at no time is the
    relative position of a body in relative motion or a physical magnitude precisely determined, whether
    during a measured time interval, however small, or at a precise static instant in time, as at no time is it not
    constantly changing and undetermined. Thus, it is exactly due to there not being a precise static instant in
    time underlying a dynamical physical process, and the relative motion of body in relative motion or a
    physical magnitude not being precisely determined at any time, that motion and variation in physical
    magnitudes is possible: there is a necessary trade off of all precisely determined physical values at a time,
    for their continuity through time.
    In the present report this simple but very counter-intuitive conclusion is developed and explored in
    further detail and its general implications have important significance to time and its relationship to
    classical and quantum mechanics, while also providing an insight into the reason and purpose for
    indeterminacy and uncertainty in nature. An overview of the main theoretical results reported, presented
    in the numerical order in which they later appear follows: (3) A body (micro and macroscopic) in relative
    motion does not have a precisely determined relative position at any time, and all physical magnitudes are
    not precisely determined at any time, although with the parameter and boundary of their respective
    position and magnitude being determinable

    1. Re:Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The paper shown here is by Peter Lynds maybe it should have been put into a better context.

      Anyways, Lynds' paper is so important that many people in the Science world consider Lynds to be the next Einstein. This is interesting, since Lynds is only 27 and a college dropout who postulated this new theory of time while working in a boring job.

      His theory of time does also shatter all previous works that deal with time. Also, his theory puts forward the concept that time cannot be quantified (which is loggically speaking quite plausable).

      The reason why many scientists do not hold his theories very well is due to the fact that all of physics would have to be revised when this paper gets published. This paper in their opinion is very scary and should not be seen by many people. There have even been death threats on the young scientist.