Slashdot Mirror


Best Cell Phone Service for GPRS?

hojo asks: "I have a Palm Tungsten T and I'd like to start using it for (limited) wireless web browsing. It has Bluetooth support and will work with GPRS cell service. Alltel, my current cell provider, doesn't support GPRS so I want to switch to another plan. What cell phone service plans are there that you have used or know about that will work to allow me to use my Palm and preferably a Bluetooth phone for some on-the-road lookup? My only other issue is I'm trying to keep the cost less than $100/month."

53 comments

  1. SE t616 by mcowger · · Score: 1

    The Sony Ericsson T616...fabulous phone - available on on ATTWS and Cingular

  2. Costs: by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm trying to keep the cost less than $100/month.

    The whole point of GPRS is that you pay for the traffic you use (rather than connect time), so if you want to keep costs down, you simply have to keep traffic down. As for the best service, it will depend on what performs well in your area. Here in Western Australia, Vodafone is pretty good, but it your mileage may (will) vary. It shouldn't make any difference what hardware you use: that's just a matter of preference.

    1. Re:Costs: by Fat+Cow · · Score: 1

      Actually, T-mobile at least and, I think, ATT and Cingular both offer unlimited GPRS in the states.

      --
      stay frosty and alert
    2. Re:Costs: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T doesn't. They have various plans with included amounts then varying costs at every k above.

  3. U.S. Options by Jenova_Sidekick · · Score: 4, Informative

    In the U.S., your options are T-Mobile and AT&T. T-Mobile is the only U.S. provider that has a nationwide GSM/GPRS network, so they're the best bet for coverage. They're the best bet for price, too. Recently. they changed all their GPRS plans to unlimited usage. with at least a $29 voice plan, you get unlimited GPRS for $19/month. By itself, it's $29/month. I had a Sidekick/Hiptop device for several months, and recently traded for a Pocket PC Phone Edition. I average about 20-30 Kbps download, with occasional peaks around 50 Kbps. I love that tbe connection is "always-on", too. In fact. I read this article. and posted this reply on my Pocket PC phone Edition. :-) I love being a gadget geek! W?BIC!

    1. Re:U.S. Options by demmegod · · Score: 1

      I just added this plan on to my cell phone service. I use it with my Nokia 6310i (not available from T-Mobile) which has bluetooth and my 12" Powerbook (also has bluetooth) and I have nothing but good things to say about it. Setting it up wasn't hard, and I've always been able to connection when my cell gets any service. Most places I connect at, the signal isn't great, but it's always faster than using my phone to dial up. I'm not sure whether it's a GPRS limitation, or my cell phone, but I can't use both GPRS and voice at the same time, and I have to "dial up" to the GRPS provider (T-Mobile.) Neither is too much trouble, however.

  4. Fuck the American non-standards... by andrewski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When can I get a GSM phone that'll work over here? I'm sick of paying for the devleopment of a new, proprietary, single-carrier network each year. Time to join the 20th century and go GSM.

    Wait, I don't even use a cell phone. My time is too valuable to me.

    1. Re:Fuck the American non-standards... by innosent · · Score: 1

      umm, we have GSM here, although it isn't yet the most popular (lots of old TDMA with AT&T and Cingular, and CDMA with Sprint and Verizon). In fact, we've had it for years (T-Mobile, previously Voicestream). For national carriers, T-Mobile, AT&T, or (in some areas) Cingular all have GSM phones and service.

      For the original post, I'd say pick the best service, and try an Ericsson T68i. It's a great phone, and you can use it as a bluetooth modem.
      My only concern would be the speeds of GPRS. If you want speed, get the Sprint PCMCIA card, for $80/month, you can get unlimited access, with speeds usually between 110-230KB/sec. (And yes, I mean kilobytes). We have them at work, and they are on average about the same speed as my cable modem at home. Not bad for internet service anywhere there's cell service.

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    2. Re:Fuck the American non-standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to check your speeds, that is about 5 times faster then full on 3G cell service.

    3. Re:Fuck the American non-standards... by attaboy · · Score: 1

      From personal experience, I have to disagree with both of your recommendations...

      The Bluetooth functionality may be cool, but I have the T68i with AT&T, and for some reason, whether it's antenna, circuitry, or something, it has crap reception, even when other AT&T users with different phones have decent reception.

      Also, at work we use the Sprint PCS cards (specifically the Novatel Wireless Merlin C201) which has a max THEORETICAL speed of 144 kBITS/sec, so your claimed speed of 230 KBytes/sec is 13 times the theoretical max. The other cards, including their top of the line Sierra Wireless AirCard, offer the same theoretical max, and their claimed maximum practical speed is 40-60kbits/sec.

      From personal experience, I'd say that those peak rates are accurate (about as fast as a decent 56k modem connection) although most of the time I get a slower connection than that, around 4KBytes/sec download (so 32kbps).

      On the other hand, maybe you're using some special sprint PCMCIA hardware that isn't available to the rest of us yet...

      On the flip side, Sprint's network is fantastic, and the external antennas on these things mean you can pick up a signal ANYWHERE. I've seen a weak signal at 30,000 feet cruising across country, although I didn't attempt any downloads from the plane ;-)

      --
      The facts have a liberal bias. --The Daily Show
    4. Re:Fuck the American non-standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      way to go fuck-nut, leave your phone on while you fly and ruin it for everyoen on the ground getting dropped calls.

    5. Re:Fuck the American non-standards... by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Yes, we have GSM here. It's expensive, and coverage is quite pitiful. Really a shame.

  5. Most any European operator by adelton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most any European operator will provide you with reasonable GPRS plan.

    Oh wait, you're not in Europe but in Singapore? Or Angola? Well, then bad luck, I have no idea, you should have stated _where_ you were.

    Administrators, could we just skip this kind of submissions that somehow forget that there's world behind borders on poster's Iowa house?

    1. Re:Most any European operator by kinnell · · Score: 1

      The fact that he posted a budget of $100 and failed to mention which country he is in should be enough to deduce that the poster is , in fact, an american ;-)

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  6. 100 a month ? by camilita · · Score: 1

    That is expensive. Well, I was under the impression that cell phone rates were cheap in the US. I remember watching ads for "4000 minutes for 40 USD". Rates in Mexico are just crazy. You get 75 minutes for around 35 USD with no SMS. You need to pay 8 dollars more for that, plus 10 USD for 1MB of GPRS.

    There is an old discussion about gprs rates in esato

    1. Re:100 a month ? by error502 · · Score: 1

      Well, for a $100 he could probably get 1000+ minutes a month. Cingular, for example, has a plan that costs $100/month and gives you 1350 anytime minutes nationwide, and 5000 night and weekend minutes. That also includes rollover minutes, so you're unused minutes from the previous month can be used towards future months, to avoid overage charges.

      Personally, I have a family plan with three additional phones. We pay $49.99 a month for 1000 anytime minutes and 5000 night and weekend minutes with rollover for the northeast United States (from about Boston to Washington, DC). Then, each additional phone is $9.99 a month with minutes being deducted from the primary (1000 minutes/month) plan. And every phone is GSM.

      If you want GPRS on a specific phone, but not on the entire family plan, it's possible, too. On Cingular, anyway, it costs ~$7/megabyte. I believe it's cheaper with other cellular providers, but Cingular has always had weird pricing schemes when it comes to data.

  7. Traffic by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The whole point of GPRS is that you pay for the traffic you use (rather than connect time)...
    That's the theory. And it does appear that nobody's charging for GPRS connect time. (I'm not even sure it's possible.) But the big GSM/GPRS provider in my area (TMobile, California) seems to have had trouble selling GPRS on per-packet basis, and now offers a monthly rate with unlimited usage. I suspect people found the per-packet plan too expensive. Might be different in the U.S. than in countries where almost everybody uses GSM (such as Australia), and they can recover their capital costs from a larger consumer base.

    Here's a little background for people in GSM-only land. Outside the U.S. In the U.S., providers refused to standardize their technology, claiming that GSM wasted too much bandwidth. If I remember correctly, CDMA is the leading technology, with TDMA second, and various forms of GSM (not all of them compatibile with international GSM systems) a distant third.

    1. Re:Traffic by The+Mayor · · Score: 4, Informative

      The GSM used in the US is compatible with Europe. There are 3 bands commonly used by GSM. Only 2 of these are used in the US, since the third is in the unlicensed 900MHz spectrum (a licensed spectrum in most of the world).

      Dual-band GSM phones work fine in the US, but may be more succeptible to bandwidth crowding. But international GSM phones work fine in the US, and US GSM phones work fine outside the US (just about every country outside the US uses GSM).

      --
      --Be human.
    2. Re:Traffic by richi · · Score: 1
      There are 3 bands commonly used by GSM. Only 2 of these are used in the US, since the third is in the unlicensed 900MHz spectrum

      There are actually four GSM/GPRS bands in use around the world: 850, 900, 1800, and 1900 MHz. The US uses 1900, and is beginning to use 850 (I believe freed up from old TDMA and AMPS cells). 850 is also used in South America.

      The parent post implies that 1800 is also used in the US: I'm not aware that's true, but perhaps that's a new thing too.

      Europe and most other countries use 900 and 1800. So, if you need to roam worldwide (with notable exceptions of CDMA-only Japan and Korea), for best flexibility you need one of the new breed of quad-band phones from Motorola or Handspring/PalmOne.

      richi.

    3. Re:Traffic by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just a minor comment:

      The TDMA you refer to is officially called D-AMPS I believe. It uses TDMA as its modulation scheme - But so does GSM.

      Most CDMA providers (Basically all for now, this will change with UMTS) use cdmaOne or CDMA2000. CDMA2000 is a seamless upgrade from cdmaOne. (cdmaOne phones work on CDMA2000 networks and vice versa, unlike UMTS and GSM, which are completely incompatible with each other.) UMTS (3G GSM) also uses CDMA for modulation.

      Of the providers in the U.S.
      Verizon - cdmaOne, rolling out CDMA2000 gradually

      Sprint PCS - Small CDMA2000 network. They rolled out CDMA2000 to all their towers at once.

      AT&T - Formerly D-AMPS. Their D-AMPS network was #1 in coverage, even better than VZW. AT&T shot themselves in the foot by upgrading to GSM. Not only did they negate their coverage advantage, but they rolled out a dead-end technology with no upgrade path. (UMTS requires new base stations, new phones, and new RF heads network-wide. A partial UMTS rollout is not possible.)

      Cingular - Another D-AMPS gone GSM provider.

      VoiceStream (now T-Mobile) - Has been GSM since Day 1. Worst coverage and service of any provider in the nation. GSM can't seem handle multiple providers gracefully, so many T-Mobile customers started getting "Service Unavailable" the day that AT&T or Cingular put a GSM tower on-air in their area. (See an above comment about AT&T's "No Service Weekends" plans.)

      Nextel - Uses Motorola's iDEN system. Completely proprietary, but is firmly entrenched in the construction/contractor business due to their direct-connect functionality.

      There are also a few smaller CDMA providers, such as Alltel. Note that Verizon seems to have roaming agreements with all of the other CDMA providers, very often "one-way" ones. (Verizon customers can use Sprint towers as part of their plan, but Sprint customers can't use VZW towers. Of course, VZW customers are paying more per minute for that privilege. As a VZW customer - It's worth it. I hear people with other providers complain about their cell service routinely - My service is great.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:Traffic by lionelhutz_esq · · Score: 1
      Here's a little background for people in GSM-only land. Outside the U.S. In the U.S., providers refused to standardize their technology, claiming that GSM wasted too much bandwidth. If I remember correctly, CDMA is the leading technology, with TDMA second, and various forms of GSM (not all of them compatibile with international GSM systems) a distant third.

      if you decide to provide us non-americans with some background you should do so in an accurate way. bandwidth is only one parameter when comparing telecom access technologies. for instance, cdma phones dont have sim cards which is certainly a very positive feature. you base cdma's superiority simply on basis of bandwidth (its like saying a dodge viper is a superior car than the maybach simply because it is faster).

    5. Re:Traffic by David+D · · Score: 1

      SIM cards are on a layer much higher than CDMA/TDMA. You could very well have SIM cards on a CDMA network.

    6. Re:Traffic by b!arg · · Score: 1

      I know Verizon has an unlimited plan with CDMA 2000 for $79.99/month. Actual speeds are anywhere from 60-90kbps. I had to buy a $300 wireless card for my laptop. I'm not sure how it would work with a PDA since I connected using the card and not a phone.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    7. Re:Traffic by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be assuming that I'm an advocate of CDMA. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I hate my CDMA phone, and will switch to GSM at the first opportunity. The hodgepodge of cell technologies in the U.S. sucks royally.

    8. Re:Traffic by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      VoiceStream (now T-Mobile) - Has been GSM since Day 1. Worst coverage and service of any provider in the nation. GSM can't seem handle multiple providers gracefully, so many T-Mobile customers started getting "Service Unavailable" the day that AT&T or Cingular put a GSM tower on-air in their area. (See an above comment about AT&T's "No Service Weekends" plans.)

      Nope - T-Mobile has better coverage than any other provide in Northern/Central New Jersey. Verizon comes a close second. You can't judge a national network by your own experience. Sprint is HORRIBLE in New York / New Jersey, but it is supposedly excellent in California.

    9. Re:Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in california and sprint sucks here now too. A few years ago they were great but I think they oversold their network out here because everyone i know that has them can't get a signal for shit. Verizon rules on this coast.

    10. Re:Traffic by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 1

      "GSM can't seem handle multiple providers gracefully, so many T-Mobile customers started getting "Service Unavailable" the day that AT&T or Cingular put a GSM tower on-air in their area."

      GSM handles whole stacks of providers just fine. If T-Mobile screwed up that's their problem. I can access at least 5 GSM providers where I live.

      --
      ----- .sig: file not found
    11. Re:Traffic by adelton · · Score: 1

      cdma phones dont have sim cards which is certainly a very positive feature.

      You mean that SIM cards are positive feature or that not having them is a positive feature? If the later, could you please elaborate?

  8. Slashdot is America! America is Slashdot! by fm6 · · Score: 0

    It may not be terribly obvious, but Slashdot is definitely a U.S.-centric site. There's an implicit assumption that the default location for Slashdot stories in the U.S. I don't think that's anything to apologize for, though it could be more clearly stated.

    1. Re:Slashdot is America! America is Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Slashdot is America! America is Slashdot!

      Wonder if people in i.e. Argentina or even Mexico agrees?

    2. Re:Slashdot is America! America is Slashdot! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      They'd agrees if they'd recognizes irony.

    3. Re:Slashdot is America! America is Slashdot! by adelton · · Score: 1

      You are correct and I have no problem with Slashdot being U.S.-centric (certainly wouldn't mind otherwise, but can live with it :-). However, the original post was nonsense even in U.S.-centric media, IMHO. He failed to say where in the U.S. he were, where he travels, what are his usage patterns ... You cannot give any useful help because on the other coast, conditions may be completely different.

    4. Re:Slashdot is America! America is Slashdot! by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Well, there you have a point. About 75% of the time in Ask Slashdot, we get a question that's really specifics-deficient. (Cliff should really bounce these back to the submitters and ask them to fill in the blanks.) But a couple of notes:
      • You did make fun of the submitter for not mentioning what country he's in.

      • Some of the details you mention should have been included, but we certainly don't want to talk about cell phone issues that only apply to where he lives. A conversation that only applies to residents of Iowa is as out of place on Slashdot as one that only applies to residents of Wales. (Their populations are about the same.) One's specific residence is more relevent to the people answering the question than the guy asking, because they need to provide any indications that their facts might be local, even if the question is national.
    5. Re:Slashdot is America! America is Slashdot! by adelton · · Score: 1

      Well, I couldn't resist joking a little. Hope no one is offended too much.

      I believe that either he is looking for an answer to his immediate need, and then he should be as specific as possible. At least saying how much he expect to travel and how much he expects to use the plan would be nice. And on which cost he is based. Or the question was more like "I'd be interested to know what are the GPRS conditions around in U.S., Canada, Europe and Asia, to get a broad picture". Then he should have said so and I'd happily bring in some European quotes.

  9. T-Mobile and AT&T wireless by scumdamn · · Score: 1

    In the US AT&T Wireless services and T-Mobile both have GPRS services. I have a GPRS PC card and it's pretty cool how it works even though it's slow.
    I've heard some rumblings of a flat-rate service for *puts pinky to corner of mouth* FIFTY dollars a month!

    1. Re:T-Mobile and AT&T wireless by Jenova_Six · · Score: 1

      As I posted earlier, under my mobile login Jenova_Sidekick, T-Mobile already offers a stand-alone unlimited GPRS plan for $29.99/month

      You can add unlimited GPRS to a qualifying voice plan ($29 or higher) for just $19.99.

      They moved to this new rate structure a couple of months ago, and abandoned all of their "pay for play" plans at the same time. Smartest move they could have made, IMHO.

      I love unlimited GPRS on my Pocket PC Phone Edition!

    2. Re:T-Mobile and AT&T wireless by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      How would you compare the Sidekick to the Pocket PC Phone Edition?

      D

    3. Re:T-Mobile and AT&T wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sidekick is a great integrated device, and does what it's designed to do (email, AIM, web browsing) very well. However, it is lacking in some areas (no sync capability yet, no IR beaming, no installing new applications, etc.). Most, if not all, of these features have been promised by Danger and T-Mobile, but I, along with the rest of the community at www.hiptop.com, grew tired of waiting. I understand the development processes that Danger has to follow, but it was just taking too long. They promise MSN Messenger, SSH, and many other applications, but nothing has materialized yet.

      The Pocket PC Phone Edition, on the other hand, is very expandable (software-wise). You can install dozens of applications to do almost anything (SSH, AIM, Jabber, etc.). It has MSN Messenger built in, along with a Terminal Server client. One of my favorite applications is Fonix VoiceDial - lets you say "call So-and-so at work" or whatever, for all of your contacts, with no voice training required. It works really well, and never fails to impress people when I show it off. :-) I also have a little app on my Today screen called StocksAndWeatherToday. It updates the current weather conditions and 5 day forecast every x minutes, and displays it on the Today screen. It can also use a Theme pack with more than 100 themes (wallpapers) to change the theme to match the weather conditions (sunny, cloudy, rainy), with day and night versions.

      You can use any .wav file as a ringtone (with Windows Media support in the 2003 version of the OS), and use it as a speakerphone. Plus, you get all the benfits of a Pocket PC - full syncing with Outlook, Word, Excel, voice recording, etc. There's an SD card for memory expansion.

      What drove me to the Sidekick in the first place? Unlimited GPRS data (at the time, the only cheap unlimited plan from T-Mobile), built-in keyboard, and promise of expandability. What drove me away from the Sidekick to the Pocket PC Phone Edition? $19 unlimited GPRS for any plan, and the flexibility of the Pocket PC platform (I have to confess that I am a Pocket PC lover anyway).

  10. Sprint and Verizon.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't have GRPS, but instead have 1xRTT, a service much faster and reliable than GRPS. It runs on top of CDMA.

    GRPS is dependant on GSM.

    But, with T-Mobile you can get unlimited T-Zones (WAP access over GRPS) for $10/mo + voice plan, and with a little luck configure this on a laptop/other device. Or, you can pay $20/mo for unlimited T-Mobile Internet, get faster speeds, and get official tech support.

    1xRTT is a better serice than GRPS, though. If you're getting a phone only for data, I'd go for a 1xRTT service.

  11. Tungsten W and AT&T by MrIcee · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just picked up a Tungsten W after learning that AT&T wireless now offers GPRS here on the Big Island of Hawaii. Up until now only verison had wireless internet, but it wasn't GPRS.

    The AT&T service is fine - though not all the transmitters here have GPRS. AT&T let me keep my non-GPRS cell phone as well (you have to maintain a voice plan along with the data plan). The nice thing is... I've now got 2 cell numbers (one for the non-gprs phone and one for the tunsten w). The non-gprs phone works pretty much everywhere on the island (except places where all cell service is blacked out due to mountains) and the tunsten works many, but not all places (e.g., it doesn't work up on the active volcano - whereas my cell phone has excellant reception there).

    AT&T plans start around $20 and go up to around $79 or so... at the $70ish range they do offer an unlimited bandwidth plan.

  12. Geographic knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Agree (even though the $100 wasn't needed to figure it out :-)

    <offtopic>
    Even if slashdot may be US centric as another posting pointed out, there is still no other population in the world who are as unaware of the rest of the world as US citizens are (when looked upon as a group of course, there are exceptions).

    When I went to school in the late 80s, there were research published that showed that 10% of the US students could not find USA on a world map. Among these 10% many of them pointed to the Soviet Union (which existed at that time). When asked to explain why they thought that the country they pointed out was the USA - they said "it is the largest country on the map". I wonder if there has been great improvments in the last 1.5 decades?

    But to be fair, other large "western" countries have similar "defects", although not as severe. When Readers Digest asked the question "Which EU coutry have the largest population" to citizens of all EU contries, including those that will soon enter the EU, the answers from the citizens in some of the biggest countries spoke for themselves:

    In UK, most people answered UK.
    In Germany, most people answered Germany.
    In France, most people answered France.

    And, no, not all of them were right.
    </offtopic>

    Sincere regards from a smaller EU country! :-)

  13. Sony-Ericsson T68i, AT&T, Tungsten T by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

    The $75.55 I paid AT&T last month covered more minutes than I used (56) and more data than I used (7.4 MB). I surf the web recklessly, but I haven't used more than 2MB in any one day yet. The T68i in New York City is somewhat cruddy as a phone (the signal strength is weak), but works okay as a GPRS modem with the Tungsten since I can stick it on the window sill. The T68i battery life is very good.

  14. Another vote for AT&T (sorta) by jakedata · · Score: 3, Informative

    Off grid, off the coast of Maine on an island with an external directional antenna plugged into one end of my Nokia 6310i and a solar panel plugged into the other end, I enjoyed uninterrupted data service via AT&Ts GPRS service.
    I used the infrared port on the phone to link to my laptop. Didn't want to spend the $$$ for a Bluetooth adapter.

    Caveat 1 - No unlimited data service plan yet.

    Caveat 2 - You get a NAT address 10.x.x.x rather than a routable IP address - so have that VPN ready on your cable modem.

    Caveat 3 - Windows based AT&T software that filters ads, compresses graphics and manages dialup. You don't absolutely need it, but it is a big help.

    Caveat 4 - Pro-rating of the monthly service charge also pro-rated my data allotment. I went over and was charged much extra $$$.

    All that being said, It worked quite well.

    -j

  15. ATT Sucks.... by Goyuix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I picked up an ATT plan and a Siemens S56 for the sole purpose of using Bluetooth to get on the internet and read slashdot.... And I have to say I was utterly depressed by the speed of the service. The actual transfer of data wasn't horrible, around 33.6K average experience (though it seemed to peak higher at times) - it took a good 10 seconds to resolve DNS and start the data flowing, or whatever the heck ATT was doing. I have heard TMobile / Verizon have pretty decent data plans (unlimted for $20 / month). If you are serious about this whole thing that would be a top choice.

  16. Re:fsck the Sony-Ericsson crap phone by thedave · · Score: 2, Informative
    Yeah, I'm gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you on that one, Bob.

    Sony Ericsson phones have lot's of flash, but phones they suck. The display is pretty and eye-candy like screen savers and games are cool. And, it has great connectivity (IRDA and Bluetooth). But, as a telecommunication device they just stink.

    All the flash comes at a price, because the phone frequently crashes. I have three different failure modes.

    Invalid Mobile The phone dies silently and the banner line reads invalid mobile. This happens approximately once a week. Cycling power and re-entering the PIN corrects the problem.

    No Signal The phone has zero signal strenght even in areas with known good signal. This happens twice a week. Cycling power fixes

    Self Power Off Sitting on a table (normally on my bedside table when I've relied on it as an alarm clock) it will power itself off. This happens only occasionally. You have to remove the battery to get it to work again. Also, as a telephone call placing instrument, I find that it has numerous usability problems.

    No notification for failed calls

    When originating calls it says connecting, then goes back to the main screen with no user notification whatever. Which means you cannot dial, then hold the phone to your ear to wait to connect. You have to watch the screen until it connects.

    You cannot edit a keyed number

    You have to attempt the call, then on redial you can edit your keyed number.

    The phonebook is incredibly slow

    I have hundreds of contacts, and scrolling the list takes seconds to refresh. It is painful looking for a name.

    Keypresses are queued (sometimes)

    Remembering that the user interface is very slow, the phone queues keypresses. This could be good. But, when answering a call (for instance), your press the yes/off-hook key you get no response from the UI, so you press it again. Well about 3 out of 5 calls get answered and put immediately on hold by my impatient thumb.

    The joystick is fragile

    If you carry the phone in a pocket, you can easily jam the joystick either into the select position or a direction. This makes the UI behave even stranger. Or, while scrolling down the list, it will get stuck and overshoot what you were looking for.

    I have found that these results are consistent among the various T series phones. I have a new T68i (two months old). My brother has the T300. And, friends with various other generations.

    My next phone will be a Nokia. My Nokia 8890 was the best phone I've ever owned. I'm looking at a 6610 as the replacement for my T68i.

    --
    [ .sig removed due to death threats from zealots who seek to control me out of fear for their hidden d
  17. Cingular == T-Mobile in California and New York by leighklotz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cingular and T-Mobile jointly operate their data networks in California but each have their own 10MHz, so call/data volume on one doesn't affect the other. T-Mobile provides Cingular's service in New York, as well. See this press release.

    So if you live in one of those two areas, there would be no coverage difference between them and ATT Wireless is the only other option. GPRS roaming between T-Mobile and ATT Wireless does not work, even though they have a voice roaming agreement.

  18. T-Mobile in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you're in US, I strongly suggest you to go with T-Mobile with their unlimited GPRS plan. By subscribing to the unlimited GPRS plan, you're not only get internet connection to your phone, but also the ability to send/receive mms. Yes, you do not have to subscribe T-Zone if you're in the unlimited GPRS plan. Currently I'm using Sony Ericsson P800. With unlimited GPRS plan, I can connect my PocketPC, and laptop to internet using bluetooth. Or, use Opera browser for P800 to browse internet right from the phone itself. It's a great device.
    Unlimited GPRS dataplan is only $20 if you're in their voice plan, otherwise you have to pay more.
    So think of it as paying an additional dial-up service per month.

    The GPRS connection itself is not bad at all. It is comparable to dial-up. I can do a 21k wma streaming audio from http://www.di.fm/ and still can chat online.

    I used to go online using dial-up account with a cell phone. Trust me, you don't want to go this path. It is even slower than 9600 bps modem.

    The best thing about GPRS is that you can receive call when you're online. When the phone rings, it will postpone the connection, and receive the voice call. Don't go with cheap CSD or HCSD, go with GPRS.

    However, if you're online with a laptop, as soon as you pick-up that voice call, your dial-up connection will be dropped. You have to reconnect after you're done talking.

    Bottom line, go with T-Mobile GPRS unlimited data plan. You won't regret it.

  19. Isn't it an easy choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why not just go for the $30 a month T-Mobile unlimited GPRS plan? That is one of the best deals I have ever heard of.

    I live in the UK, and GPRS charges here are mad (and you have to have a voice plan as well) - we pay 15 a month (which is around $30) for only 7Mb!

    I wish we had an unlimited GPRS plan that cheap in the UK. Take advantage of it - you're lucky.

  20. *coughcoughBULLSHITcoughcough* by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    "T-Mobile has better coverage than any other provide in Northern/Central New Jersey."

    Look at T-Mobile's coverage map: http://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/Default.asp

    Then look at Verizon's coverage map.

    Oh look, Verizon is STILL the only provider that can cover 100% of the landmass of the most densely populated state in the union.

    And I *live* in Central Jersey (Bridgewater, I work in Warren) - My Verizon phone routinely works in places where T-Mobile phones don't work. I have yet to go anywhere that my Verizon phone does NOT work around here, with the exception of inside the office building I work in where no one's phones work. (The building was built with significant RF shielding due to the fact that we develop power amplifiers for cell towers - Between that and all the interference from amps being tested, no one's phones work reliably anywhere but the lunchroom.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:*coughcoughBULLSHITcoughcough* by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      Oh look, Verizon is STILL the only provider that can cover 100% of the landmass of the most densely populated state in the union.

      Coverage maps don't mean squat - my Verizon-subscribing coworkers have told me that their claim of "100% coverage in New Jersey" is bullshit. There are plenty of spots in New Jersey where your phone won't work (and neither will mine).

  21. t68i - one person's experience by rogueroo · · Score: 1

    My experience with my T68i and AT&T service has been, for the most part, phenomenal. But maybe I'm just easy-to-please. I have just a few comments about thedave's points above:

    I have three different failure modes.
    I have never seen a phone failure. Sometimes I can't access my addressbook for a brief period of time after powering the phone on.

    No notification for failed calls
    Yes, I've noticed that calls that fail to connect do not result in a voice notification; I end up waiting for far too long until I realize that it just isn't going to connect.

    You cannot edit a keyed number
    I don't know what this means, which I guess means that I've never tried it.

    The phonebook is incredibly slow
    I've not experienced slowness, but rather not being able to use it at all for a brief time after powering the phone on.

    The joystick is fragile
    Never for me. And I always carry it in my pocket.

    I switched from T-Mobile last winter and have had no problems at all. I'm near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, for what it's worth. Just wanted to note my experiences perhaps as a contrast to thedave.

  22. Thoughts on T-Mobile by x+e+q+u+a · · Score: 1

    T-Mobile is great, if you can get a signal. Most times, I have to make calls from the sidewalk outside my house, because of the lack of a signal from even my porch. I called 'Customer Care,' and the reason for the piss-poor signal is that two of the four towers effecting my zipcode have been down for over a month. But for my troubles, they gave me a whopping credit of... five lousy bucks.

  23. T-Mobile GPRS service sucks in Upstate NY by kenyob · · Score: 1

    All I know that you need to get a tri-mode phone in the minimum. I have the PocketPC phone... love the phone Hate the service. At least with a tri-mode phone it could possibly hop over to CDMA if it needs to. (i think this can be done) My business partner and I dislike the service so much that we are dropping the service (T-Mobile has been nice enough to not bill us for the phones or the early termination fee) and probably switching over to Verizon or Nextel. Just need to find a decent PDA/Phone... Any suggestions? My phone will probably be going up on Ebay soon so be on the lookout.