Slashdot Mirror


Australian Gov't To Launch Net Crackdown

docfisher writes "According to this article on whirlpool, the Australian Govt is proposing laws that would allow sentences of up to two years jail time for using the internet for "menacing or offensive purposes". According to The Age, Protest organisers will also be targetted in the clampdown. Press release by Senator Alston here."

24 comments

  1. Great. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Offensive behaveyor. LEts see, that means i can have all religious sites off the internet, as they offend me. All sites advocating censorship. ALl government sites will have to be taken down, as the idea that they know better than i do offends me. WHo else can i take out under this vague and poorly worded law? WHen im done there will be nothing left but pornograpy, slashdot, and lemur jokes.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Great. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      not only that but i'd bet that all of the cases where this law would be really needed are already covered by other laws(just because you're on internet doesn't make it any different from the 'real' world on most 'menacing' and 'offending' acts).

      -

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Great. by jazman_777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What makes you think _you_ get to decide what is offensive? It really means offensive to the State. The State always takes care of itself first, even against the people. (For example, it will prosecute counterfeiters more severely than check kiters.)

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:Great. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      WHen im done there will be nothing left but pornograpy, slashdot, and lemur jokes.

      You have just offended me and my pet lemur! Off to prison with ye!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Great. by novakreo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Offensive behaveyor. LEts see, that means i can have all religious sites off the internet, as they offend me.

      Actually, religious sites are probably one of the few categories that this law couldn't cover, since under section 116 of the Australian Constitution, the Commonwealth is not allowed to prohibit the free exercise of any religion.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    5. Re:Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the thought police are on the prow down under.

    6. Re:Great. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Offensive behaveyor.

      In the US, that is already illegal. Depending on whom you offend. A man was once sentanced to jail time for parking an EMPTY Ryder truck outside of an abortion clinic.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  2. Oy.... by tha_mink · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's Australian for fascism.

    --
    You'll have that sometimes...
  3. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're all a bunch of criminals anyway.

    I mean, Australia *was* a prison island for England afterall.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For criminals by criminals (and I'm an Australian) Richard Alston is often referred to as the worlds biggest luditte.

  4. Engage brain before making law by satyap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone please tell the lawmakers to think a little. Like someone's already pointed out, just because it's the internet doens't make it different. Of course, there are differences, which are blithely ignored when it suits the lawmakers. I'm offended. By what? By everything! Shut down the net!

  5. Sets a Totalitarian Precedent by fuzzybunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Grandiose. Note please the use of the phrase 'telecommunications service', not 'internet'.

    This implies that the media used to organize protests to help topple Joseph Estrada, to kill Hong Kong's internal security law, to bring out mass demonstrations against Cesar Chavez, and multitudinous other demonstrations against heavy-handed government actions, such as SMS, phone, or email, can all be punishable by the government.

    In effect, this law nullifies the democratic advantage given to a population to organize against anything objectionable its government does. Equally important the bit about 'menacing'
    and 'harassment'--essentially, any political protests could be construed as such. This brings to mind the Riot Act, which stated that as soon as 12 or more people gather 'unlawfully', an officer of the law could read the act and anyone remaining at the gathering would be considered a felon.

    Equally scary, but I suppose in a fashion typical for Australian and UK governments is the use of the kiddy-porn specter (in the US the catchword is 'terrorism'):

    Communications Minister Richard Alston and Justice Minister Chris Ellison said the new offence was part of a package to also crack down on internet child pornography.

    Clever, clever way to pass a law over potential objections--think of the children! As an outsider, I'm not qualified to criticize Australian politics on the whole, but boy, that seems like one scary senator you've got there.
    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    1. Re:Sets a Totalitarian Precedent by Alsee · · Score: 1

      the kiddy-porn specter (in the US the catchword is 'terrorism'):

      No, lucky us in the US have both. Terrorism is bigger/more pervasive of the two at the moment, but don't assume that somehow diminishes the kiddy-porn boogieman.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. Front Page by temojen · · Score: 1

    Why is this not a front page story? Laws do have a tendency to spread, you know.

    1. Re:Front Page by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Why is this not a front page story? Laws do have a tendency to spread, you know.

      Exactly. If this was the US, it'd be front page at 1000+ posts already.

      "GEORGE BUSH is a low IQ asshole!"
      "John Ashcroft is a Nazi!"
      "New World Order = US Rule!"

      All of which may or may not be 'true'. But because it's 'only' Oz, it languishes back here...15 posts in 10 hours. Sad.

    2. Re:Front Page by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why is this not a front page story? Laws do have a tendency to spread, you know.

      Because it isn't law, or even a draft law yet. It is just another press release from Senator Alston, who is well known for political grandstanding and generally shooting his mouth (and feet) off.

      It only becomes really newsworthy when we see what the draft legislation looks like. If it is as bad as it sounds, there is little chance that it will get through the Senate without ammendment.

  7. Re:It's a start by HyperspaceSamurai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Indeed, it would be only the right thing to do. On the other hand it's good to be up to date on how to add up to three inches to your willy.

    --
    I'm trying to break into bubble gum factory.
  8. Prisoners == those few Poms with imagination left by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    They only shipped the truly dangerous ones. You figure it out.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  9. You mean "Senator Luddite"? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    I've often heard him referred to as that here in Oz. I've never met the guy personally, but his (Liberal Party, remember that party names over here are approximately the reverse of those in Yankee-land) policies seem to be missing a big dollop of what techies would regard as common sense or even basic understanding. Not that his political fellows are all angels and geniuses either. Kate Lundy (of the Labor Party, yes, spelling is correct for Oz, they are not, as has often been noted, the Labour Party) seems to have an unusually good understand of which way is up, but has her own agenda. The Democrats are such a random bunch that you can never be sure what policies the collection as a whole will emit, but there seem to be a few bright lads there, too.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  10. Exelent. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    My new 3-way lesbian altar ceremony should be exempt.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  11. Stupidity Without Borders by poptones · · Score: 1
    The U.S. Senate on Thursday approved a complicated child safety bill that also would ban computer-generated child pornography and sexually explicit Internet sites with misleading addresses. With the Senate's 98-0 vote, the measure now goes to President George W. Bush for his expected signature. The U.S. House of Representatives voted 400 to 25 to approve the 118-page bill...

    Just like when they all voted unanymously to support the war, then half turn around three months later and cry foul...

    Our leaders are sheep and they're leading reason - and our rights - straight to the slaughterhouse.

  12. Senator alston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man who said:
    - Broadband Internet is only used for porn and online gaming
    - 3GB is more than generation, its equal to unlimited internet who could use that much
    - Encryption should be illegal
    - ISP's MUST filter all content before users can look at it

    This man is an idiot, WHY IS HE REPRESENTING TECHNOLOGY IN THE GOVERNMENT IN MY COUNTRY.

    Wade Mealing

  13. hmm by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    like I've said, I'm gonna laugh when all systems entropy due to greed, and control whores. Really, there's no safe place to go anymore.. basically, we're all fucked and so the best thing you can do is sit back and let the system take itself down. becuase if you dare challenge, say the US govt. you're a terrorist and you're gonna sit in jail for the rest of your days without hearing or any actual rights.. Hitler would be proud.