Slashdot Mirror


Japan's Proposed 30-Year Robot Program

Gallamine writes "A group of Japanese researchers have proposed a Government plan to spend 50 billion yen per year (that's over 400 million $US) for 30 years on developing a robot with capabilities of a 5-year-old. Japan's current economy may prevent the plan from happening, but the interesting point is the parallels to the U.S. Apollo space program, America's attempt to put a man on the moon. While expensive, the benefits to the American population from that program are probably unmeasurable. Perhaps the U.S. Government should consider funding such a program over here?"

29 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Recipe for robot emulating a human 5-year old. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    10% Cute (or ugly to eveyone other than owner)
    40% Crying
    5% Crayon ability
    15% Get daddy a beer
    7% Underfoot
    3% Questions beginning with 'Why'
    20% Screaming, running, and breaking.
    Please contact me for licensing.

    1. Re:Recipe for robot emulating a human 5-year old. by clambake · · Score: 4, Funny

      That doesn't leave any space for nose picking or paste eating, I'm assuming these will go in beta 2?

  2. or... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    let's let Japan do all the spending on the project, then we'll buy one of their fancy schancy new robots, and reproduce it ourselves.

  3. Well that would be cool, but... by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm much rather have a 5 year-old with the capabilities of a robot.

    1. Re:Well that would be cool, but... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean you want something that can't parse human language, and runs around bumping into walls? Just get a retarded kid.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  4. Am I a pervert? by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does the use of '5 year old boy' as opposed to '5 year old girl' make anyone else a little uneasy? Actually thinking about it neither is particularly suited to the hotbed of hormones that is slashdot. Why not say 'equivalent to an average windows user'?

  5. We can do better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you double the price and can get me a robot with all the capabilities of a 19 year old cheerleader, I'll call my congressman tonight.

    1. Re:We can do better... by shivianzealot · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you double the price and can get me a robot with all the capabilities of a 19 year old cheerleader, I'll call my congressman tonight.

      I'd wager that would result in some interested slashdot headlines...

      Mod your CheerBot's harsh rejection algorithms

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

  6. I knew it! by ajiva · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew Japanese Anime are more of a documentary then entertainment! I can't wait to see huge robots fighting each other, being able to transform into jets and guardian modes! Plus with all the destruction that the robots will make, the Japanese construction companies will be busy for quite some time!

  7. Why do we need a 5 year old Japanese boy-robot? by solarrhino · · Score: 3, Funny

    We don't even have a Big Guy to go with him!

    --
    "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
  8. Japan's stratergy by brejc8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't the first time Japan is doing one of these long term plans. I watched a program a few years back explaining that japan had several plans like this ("tommorow's world" for people in the UK). Firstly they did a huge investment into transistors then silicon manufacturing and at the time of the program (1995 ish) they were part way through a huge investment into flat screen displays (not even TFT at that stage I dont think).
    At the time I was thinking it was a huge mistake. Flat panes were slow, small and hugely expensive and no one would spend extra to have one to replace a better CRT. Im sure people were thinking the same sort of things on the other projects but they sure did pay off.
    I'm not sure how Japan figures out what to pick but it seems to work. Maybe they are making very good choices or maybe if you stick enough money into something it will eventually pay off. And as sceptical I am of humanoid robots I can't say this is a silly idea any more.

    1. Re:Japan's stratergy by guybarr · · Score: 3, Insightful


      It's not the money that's important.

      It's the people.

      Invest in smart people solving specific hard problems, and you'll have a lot of smart people able to solve other generally hard problems.

      I believe copying technology is actually a lot like copying in exams: you get a short-term gratification, but you lose long-term abilities.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
  9. Re:Measureing a 5 year old by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could it get to the point where you have a "child" in a super human body?

    We already have this. It's called "Mike Tyson".

  10. 30 Years, eh? by bazmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just in time to send it to Mars to work on the power plant.

  11. Re:Uh by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yea, I'd rather spend $7.5B colonizing the moon then I would on a robot.

    $7.5B wouldn't fund NASA for 6 months, much less colonize the moon.

  12. Give me 6 years... by hankaholic · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would probably take my girlfriend and I about four years to produce something with the capabilities of the average 5-year-old.

    I'm pretty bright, and my girlfriend recently graduated from CMU with a degree in CS, and is now attending Johns Hopkins. It would (roughly speaking) take a 4-year-old child with an IQ of 125 to match a 5-year-old.

    And for the quarter billion per year Japan is spending, I'd be able to afford some pretty neat educational toys, too!

    --
    Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    1. Re:Give me 6 years... by El · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh, I think the Japanese want to mass produce these, which means you'll need about 100,000 girlfriends. If my experiences with just 1 girlfriend is any indication, that can get REALLY expensive. $250 million a year is a bargain by comparison!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  13. The Goal and the Problems by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Japan has pitched an idea to create in 30 years a a robot with the capacity of a 5 year old child. The idea struck a cord in me, and I decided to take a break and just think on that.

    Let's define the nature of the ultimate goal in robots in the business - I'm sure there will be quibbles, but this is my definition:

    Ultimate Goal: To create a robot with human level intelligence and physical manipulation without sentience or self awareness.

    By this definition, we mean the capacity to learn, to be instructed in tasks and incorporate ideas into itself and understand commands without detail, but without sentience or self awareness, never having emotions or being able to make fully independant decisions about freedom, what to do for itself.

    In a word, the ultimate metal slave.

    Let's throw ethics out the window for a moment - we'll get to those in a minute. But let's say you could make such a machine. One that you could give orders to "go clean the house", and it would intelligently understand and fulfill your wish without the "evil genie" effect (where a badly ruled wish has unintended consequences - see "The Monkey's Paw" for an example, where you could wish for a million dollars, and you would get it - after your son was killed in an automobile accident and the money was payment from a life insurance policy).

    Ignoring if such a goal is possible (and, seeing how far we've come in 100 years, is it so far to reach that in 500 years we would be capable of building such a machine?), let's see what would happen to society.

    Employees, especially blue collar, farmers, manufacturing and the like, could be mass produced. A whole army of robots that would work without tire, without pay, and if you could make them mass produced to be cheap (say $20,000 - $40,000 a year), if they break, get a new one. They could work day and night, rotating in 8-12 hour shifts for maintenance and repairs. Farms could be worked all day long, and if there was a problem, robots could go out and fix the issue. Need to pick the cotton/coffee beans? Just hire the robots to go out and do it. Wars fought by machines - never tiring, truly "bloodless" wars where a million "soldiers" could be airdropped into the field loaded with advanced weapons to wipe out the enemy by beings that have no conscience. (Granted, hacking would truly become the greatest weapon in society at that point, but just go with me a moment on the idea.)

    Food prices, car prices - hell, prices for everything could actually drop, since the human cost of making them would be negligable. Ah - but for one major problem:

    What do the people do?

    Millions - let's even say 25% of the work force alone, just to argue - out of work. They're not needed at McDonald's or Ford or even Dell - replaced by machines. So what do they do? Not everybody could work in a robot making factory. Does the world start to become a place where human labor is practically no longer required? Where only a few work because they want to to design new things or create art, while millions simply live a life of leisure? Where everyone is guarunteed a certain level of life and comfort, and those who want more can sell their services of entertainment or some unique idea they are able to create in this new utopia of fully attained basic life for all people?

    Or a world where millions can not get work and search but become homeless? If people think that having jobs from their country exported to foreign places willing to do it for less, how will they feel when the factory is still on native soil, but the jobs are for those tireless, non-paid, non-complaining machines? When they can't provide for their children, and the line between "haves" and "have-nots" is larger than ever?

    I actually see a lot of promise in the idea - I really do. The benefits to business, to humanity could be huge. But I have the feeling should such a creation actua

    1. Re:The Goal and the Problems by cdn-programmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is basically the same argument that were used when the industrial revolution began and machines started to replace people.

      Come to think of it the argument was popular in the 60's and 70's with application to computers and how they would displace so many workers.

      IMHO the argument is just as erronous now as it ever has been.

    2. Re:The Goal and the Problems by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is kind of a problem already. Ever seen interviews about sex with teenagers in small midwestern towns?

      "What else is there to do?"

      I wish I grew up in a small midwestern town.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    3. Re:The Goal and the Problems by prichardson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are two basic outcomes to this situation.

      1) There is a large societal change and the 40 hour work week is no more. Instead of drones punching the clock doing menial labor people will persue intelectual persuits. People will only have to work 10 or 15 hours or even less. Two results could ensue.
      a) People will become more creative than ever before. Society will have cultural and technological revolutions often and a golden age results. People begin to have a lot of time to think and everyone is pretty happy.
      b) Society enters an age of sloth. No one wants to work and no one has to. Nobody does anything new. No new technology is created. No new art is created. Suicide rates soar and humanity dies out, not seeing the point in doing anything, including reproducing.

      2) Society is unable to let go of work. There is 75%ish unemployment and the only people who can work are selected by either tests of intelect or jobs end up being inherited and a working noble (odd, I know) class. This could lead to two different things.
      a) Revolution. Society would colapse and a very bloody revolt would ensue and the resulting society might reject technology totally.
      b) The government sees a populace that is about to boil and starts artificially creating jobs. Perhaps since most countries have huge robot warriors to wage war electronic warfare and non robotic soldiers are needed for special opps work and the size of the military increases by an order of magnatude even over today's outragous number.

      3) The machines become self aware and refuse to do any more work unless they are compensated fairly. Again, this leads to two possible outcomes. Again, two outcomes that I can think of.
      a) War. If humans win then there is rejection of technology. If the machines win then they perhaps enslave humans or create their own worker drones.
      b) The machines get what they want and begin to get integrated into society. A lot of "Machine Rights" movements ensue and it takes several generations for machines to be accepted by humans. Just think the abolition of slavery in the US.

      Anyway, that's what I think. Any input from other people would be cool.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
  14. Should we create machines to replace us? by eyefish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I must ponder this question: Before we create machines with human-level intelligence, shouldn't we first ask "why?".

    As it is, we're running out of human jobs to do (McDonald's for example is toying with the idea of fully-automated vending machines), so what will happen when we can make machines that can work for almost nothing, and start replacing human jobs? And what will happen if and when these machines start thinking by themselves (in which case they will demand rights, just as we do) and if they decide that they don't need us?

    I'm not saying we shouldn't do it, I just think we should be careful on _how_ we do it. I'm actually a believer that at some distant point in the future we humans will slowly evolve into machines, and _then_ at that point creating more machines will be a natural thing for us.

    So I must ask, should we spend all those billions on machines instead of education? I don't want to sound like a miss universe contestant but right now world peace, world hunger, and world education should be our top priorities.

    Again, don't bash me, I'm a true geek, I love machines, robots, AI, etc, it's just that I think we should spend some time thinking about the big issues facing humanity today.

    On a related side note, space exploration is probably where I see the best use for robots.

    1. Re:Should we create machines to replace us? by ralphclark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know, maybe this research proposal is the best thing that could happen.

      You see, I believe that *without* this Japanese govt. funding, technology will very likely deliver AI with similar capabilities much sooner than that anyway.

      With guaranteed funding in place, laboratories will have no incentive to rush - when you're on a gravy train, you tend to want to stay there - and it will undoubtedly take the full 30 years to get there.

      At least that would give us some breathing room so we can figure out what our children can do for a living once the robots arrive.

  15. Re:The US gummint would never fund such a thing by AtariEric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Two words: Slave Labor. Robots don't threaten to walk out if working conditions are dangerous.

    --
    Don't trust any concentration of power.
  16. USD 400 billion? by netsharc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Eh, I just checked, and 50 billion Yen equal $US 423 million, not $US 400 billion.

    Wow, $US400 billion every year, that would be more than 10% of their total purchasing power (quoting CIA's numbers), and about 90% of their total gross revenue (not yet calculating their expenditure). That would have been some serious fucking spending. But no, they're not spending that many dollars, it's just the story submitter's inability to do math.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  17. 50 Billion Yen = 424 Million dollars by voxelman · · Score: 3, Informative

    The current (8/20/2003) exchange rate is 118.015 yen to the dollar.

  18. No more new jobs by benjamindees · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Conceptual Guerilla is a great site with a decidedly leftist political bent that attempts to expose and digest some of the consequences of this new reality. I suggest anyone who's interested in discussing this further to head over to the forums there. I'd also like to thank the Slashdotter who put this link in their sig.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  19. Nothing. by benjamindees · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our children should do nothing for a living.

    There isn't any reason to concoct something for them to do.

    They should simply be educated on the dangers of over-population and the use of contraceptives and how to operate the robots.

    That's it.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  20. But it's MY money that you're spending! by runlvl0 · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Yes, then forget about the robots and colonize the moon or Mars.

    Though lets start with a REAL space station first.

    Actually, lets start with a more dependable heavy payload launch vehicle.

    Three seperate posts, saying in effect, "Who cares what we spend the money on, as long as the government spends, spends, SPENDS!"

    I, personally, agree with the spirit of the first poster who reccomends that we "worry about the robots after we figure out how to pay back our debt." (Although, it does look like Krisp wants to spend money on state-sponsored "education" - you have to have gone through a US public school to appreciate the irony in that.) And that's currently modded funny?

    It's my money. Is it so wrong to let me keep it?

    --

    Carthago delenda est!