Slashdot Mirror


Using Spyware to Report Pirates?

An anonymous reader asks: "I have visibility to AUP complaints we receive at work, and we receive messages from a software vendor that make it obvious that their product is phoning home when it discovers it is running a cracked copy of itself." Apparently the software phones home, and then the publisher's legal department sends the administrator an e-mail. "The message goes on to detail the users IP, a timestamp, the product in question, the users PC name, username, and MAC address. This falls under -my- definition of 'spyware.' What are your thoughts?" Software has been making surreptitious checks for "piracy" for over a decade, yet these checks are usually limited to the software itself, and not data on the user's machine. Do you feel software publishers should have the right to peer into users data, if their software suspects foul play on the machine, or should it do the easy and intelligent thing and just stop working?

3 of 1,013 comments (clear)

  1. SCO OpenServer by SHEENmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that's why my copies of OpenServer and UNIXWARE keep pingflooding kernel.org...

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  2. Re:What we want to know... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Particular CD? Hah, I guess you're too young to remember having to check page 46, line 3, word 12 in the manual. :)

    More details on that old thing (+1 nostalgia) here:
    http://www-cse.stanford.edu/classes/cs201/projects -99-00/software-piracy/copyright.html

  3. Re:What we want to know... by tf23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If that's the case, and it' sending information back, then you need a better crack!