Slashdot Mirror


Embarrassing Dispatches From The SCO Front

An anonymous reader writes "Dennis Ritchie has acknowledged he with Ken Thompson wrote the code cited as 'proof' by SCO. This seems to fit perfectly with Bruce Perens' Analysis of SCO's Las Vegas Slide Show, and undermine Blake Stowell's claim 'At this point it's going to be his word against ours." Andreas Spengler writes "In the ongoing battle between SCO and the Linux community, German publisher Heise has shown that not only was the Linux implementation of the Berkeley Packet filter written outside of Caldera (now SCO), but that it was common practice there and at other companies to remove the BSD copyright notices from the internally used source code. In effect, SCO has proven publicly that they violated the BSD license." (Warning, article is in German.) Finally, a semi-anonymous reader writes "Learn all about how IBM's stomach will be roasted on a pyre of CDs at WeLovetheSCOInformationMinister."

18 of 715 comments (clear)

  1. TOASTY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    toaster,toaster toaser, do you have toast in you yet i think
    so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Im not a toaster!!!!!!!!!!And one more
    thing........YOUR A TOASER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND A COOKIE WITH MILK SOAGE
    MILK!!!!!!!!!!AND A BUTT WITH POOP IN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Re:Does anyone actually care about SCO anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I know I'll be modded as a troll of flamebair or offtopic or overrated,

    YOU FAILED IT!
    you've been modded redundant

    ahaahahahah!

  3. Re:Turn this shit off you bunch of nooberts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Stop using words your buddies invented on IRC.

  4. GNU/First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I first used GNU/Unix and C in 1978. I rediscovered GNU/Unix in 1987. I have administered GNU/BSD,
    GNU/Ultrix, GNU/HP/UX, GNU/SunOS 4.x, GNU/SunOS 5.x and more flavours of GNU/Linux than I can
    remember although I started out using GNU/SLS with kernel 0.9.x.
    GNU/Linux has progressed so much in such a relatively short amount of time that I am in awe at
    where it is today.

    To GNU/gentoo. Then I remembered someone on cola mentioning a new distro named GNU/gentoo.

    Once this stage has been reached GNU/gentoo is as easy to maintain as any GNU/Linux distro I know.

    There is excellent documentation on the GNU/gentoo website. There is an excellent GNU/document
    describing the USE variable which should be read before installing GNU/gentoo.

    Apart from everything being compiled from source so that it is optimised for your hardware and the
    USE variable to tailor the type of system you want, GNU/gentoo has another little gem. This is the
    GNU/gentoo init system. It is based on the excellent GNU/SYSV init system but enhances it and
    makes GNU/gentoo a class apart from any other GNU/*nix system I have administered. To be brief,
    GNU/gentoo init GNU/scripts allow you to specify GNU/dependencies. There is no need to GNU/worry
    about S script numbering as in GNU/SYSV or where GNU/you place the startup code in GNU/BSD type
    GNU/init scripts (I'm referring to GNU/BSD 4.3 here. I don't GNU/know if the free GNU/BSD's have
    changed GNU/things).

    To summarise: GNU/gentoo is a very special GNU/Linux distro. It may not GNU/be for the the
    GNU/Linux GNU/neophyte (I'm sure GNU/someone posted to GNU/cola recently that GNU/gentoo was their
    first GNU/Linux GNU/install) although if GNU/you read the GNU/docs and GNU/understand what is
    going on GNU/gentoo is an excellent GNU/distro.

    GNU/Support GNU/is GNU/excellent GNU/via GNU/the GNU/gentoo GNU/forums GNU/and GNU/mailing
    GNU/lists

  5. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
  6. Re:Does anyone actually care about SCO anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    hahahaha, what a loser

  7. bunghole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    gnaa reccomends anuses cheeses

  8. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    YOU FAIL IT, FAILURE

  9. This doesn't change anything for me... by aussersterne · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    The important detail in your link is that this person a) had trouble removing the coffee cup lid and b) held the fresh cup of coffeee between her legs to try to pry the lid off.

    I wouldn't even try to hold a cup of room temperature liquid between my legs to try to get the lid off because obviously it will end up in my lap... a large part of the cup's rigidity comes from the lid; the amount of pressure required to "hold" a cup between your legs while you conjure with the lid will obviously collapse the cup if the lid is removed.

    I hate large corporations as much as the next man (and probably about a hundred times more, for anyone who has seen my slashdot posts), but sometimes stupidity is just stupidity.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:This doesn't change anything for me... by Arker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      a large part of the cup's rigidity comes from the lid; the amount of pressure required to "hold" a cup between your legs while you conjure with the lid will obviously collapse the cup if the lid is removed.

      Yes, and that's why those lids had a little flap you could pull up and make an opening to drink through without taking the lid off.

      She was an idiot, but it took the lawyers to do the real damage.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  10. Re:But which is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    why not have sex with CmdrTaco's mare (aka Kathleen Fent) after enjoying some tasty IBM stomach for dinner?

  11. Hot coffee by Arker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh bite me.

    I'm so sick of people trying to portray this nonsense as reasonable. Yes the coffee was hot. It was advertised that way. Everyone knew it was hot. I and many many others bought that same hot coffee day after day for years. We wanted it that hot, so it would still be a good temperature after we finished driving to work and had time to drink it. It came with a little cardboard holder and a cover that, when you were ready to drink, you could open in a controlled way so that it stayed mostly covered even then.

    Then one idiot clenched it between her legs to wrestle the lid of and sued McDonalds when she, predictably, burned herself. And because of her, you can't buy coffee hot enough to still be drinkable when you finish your commute anymore.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  12. Yes by mindstrm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But... let's say it was something else.. like you pried it off on a table using your hands.. and it spilled by accident because your 90 pound rottweiler decided to tackle-hug you at the same time. And it spilled, and caused 3rd degree burns over most of your lower left arm and hand, instantly burning away the skin and doing severe muscle damage. Let's say you had to go to the hospital and have a series of skin grafts, and were basically in excruciating pain for weeks, and disfigured for life.

    Now, let's say you find out that that coffee was considerably hotter than every other restaurant would serve coffee, perhaps that's why you didn't treat it with as much respect.

    ie: People know coffee is hot, yes.. but they do not treat coffee the same way they would treat boiling hot water. We know there is a distinct difference in the level of danger to our persons.

    She didnt' sue cause she got a little burn, she sued cause she was burned extremely severely..

  13. I hope every day that ESR gets shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I hope to wake up one morning and see ESR has been shot by a 14 year old gangmember toting an uzi.

    Oh thats right ESR doesn't actually live in those dangerous as hell neighborhoods with out of control gun violence.

    Mr. Black Belt ninja lives off in some lilly white town where there hasnt been a murder in 20 years.

  14. Re:Darl McBride quote from the future by heironymouscoward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The ugly truth (and I have this on good authority from a spaceship that lands in my backyard everynight), is that Darly McBride has already had his picture from ten years hence widely distributed. Apparently he got on very well with his big friends in the slammer.

    I apologise deeply for linking (deep linking?) to this offensive image but it's the one and true Darly McBride staring back at you. I figured the world had to know.

    Now, if some kind hacker would please deface www.sco.com appropriately, the world can also learn.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  15. Re:But SCO's main lawsuit isn't about this code. by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The coffee cup story has been thrown around so much that few people have heard the facts as they really happened. The McDonalds coffee was not only hot, it was scalding, and capable of almost instantaneous destruction of skin, flesh and muscle. Worse yet, the paper cup it was in was capable of easily collapsing and spilling the contents. Because of its insanely high temperature, the coffee was a real danger.

    Do they teach physics in US schools?

    Water boils at 100 degrees celcius. Above 100 cegrees celcius, it isn't water, it's steam. So it can't be held in a coffee cup of any kind. What was in the macdonalds coffee cup was water containing a suspension of coffee grounds and a very small amount of disolved material. It is simply impossible that, on the surface of the earth exposed to the atmosphere, it could have been above 100 degrees celcius.

    Personally I find coffee near 100 degrees celcius unpleasant to drink, and it can cause minor blistering of the lining of my mouth. But there's no way it can cause 'instantaneous destruction of skin, flesh and muscle'. Furthermore, black coffee is routinely served at or near 100 degrees celcius - everywhere. The case was frivolous. So is SCO's.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  16. Re:But SCO's main lawsuit isn't about this code. by antiMStroll · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I read it. She held a heated paper cup between her knees (an idiotic way to hold a paper, styrofoam or any disposable cup) and compounded it by removing an integral part of its structure, the lid, knowing full well the contents were hot. I drink coffee regularly, I've yet to try opening a cup squeezed between my knees. And squeezed it must have been, unless the claim was it spontaneously collapsed.

    She did a careless thing and was awarded damages because McDees hadn't though of every potential way for a customer to avoid crushing a paper cup. I suggest they print safety instructions on the bottom.

  17. Re:But SCO's main lawsuit isn't about this code. by scotch · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You speak of this "hot" as if it were only one thing. Since everyone knows that french fries are hot, for example, would it be OK for McD's to server french fries at 280 C? If you burned yourself, I'll just say, well, duh, everyone knows french fries are hot? Not all hot water has the same propensity for damage.

    --
    XML causes global warming.