Slashdot Mirror


Dave Phillips' Linux Sound Updated

f-matic writes "Dave Phillips' Linux Sound website has been updated (for the first time in a while) with lots of new software links and news from the recent BYOL conference, plus links to some interesting Linux multimedia articles. Seems like things are getting pretty interesting in the linux audio world, with a Supercollider port in the works, not to mention February's Linux article in the prestigious Sound on Sound magazine."

8 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Hardware is still tough... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here is a copy of an email I sent to Aardvark:

    I am the proud owner of an Aardvark Q10. I have been very happy with it so far, and it is far more versatile than my freinds ProTools Digis and Mboxes. (Which I remind them of often :)

    I have a few questions and concerns, however.

    I realize that you are working on the OS 9 drivers with OS X to follow and must be rather busy with that. Now that OS X has matured and the G5s are out, I have considered investing in a new Mac for my Q10. Is there any sort of timeframe for OS X drivers?

    Connected with this: When the OS X drivers are released, are there plans for Linux drivers? Support of Linux would drive hardware sales as there are many Linux users out there who would love to use Aardvark. (Linux users love your specs :)

    Finally, I am a avid BeOS user. Be Inc. is no more, however OpenBeOS and YellowTab Zeta are bringing it back. OpenBeOS is an open source implementation of BeOS that is binary compatable, and Zeta is, for all intents and purposes, BeOS 6 (licensed from Palm). Development of BeOS software is on the rise, and there are several new Audio programs being worked on currently, as well as new drivers being released everyday. See www.bebits.com for details.

    In doing some research before purchasing my Q10, I read that Aardvark was working on BeOS drivers, which influenced my purchase of your hardware to some degree.

    On your (old) site: http://www.aardvark-pro.com/aark24_faq.html#17

    Quotes from head honchos: http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/WNAMM99/Aardv ark/BeOS-Support.html

    My questions: Are there beta/unfinished/finished BeOS drivers for Aardvark hardware? If so, can the drivers/source code/documentation be released or purchased?

    I understand that you may have little interest in 'niche' or 'dead' OS support, but a release of drivers or specs would only drive adoption of your hardware. You could even release them as "unsupported", or as binaries (if opening the source is out of the question).

    Be Inc. may be gone, but BeOS is being replaced as we speak. I have followed and used BeOS since 1999, and am seeing interest in it swell more and more. If Aardvark released drivers or source code, you would make many friends rather quickly and raise more than a few eyebrows (in a good way :). More people are trying BeOS every day, and would like to use it for the same reasons Aardvark had when announcing support.

    I debated for quite a while whether or not to email and make these requests. I understand if releasing source code sounds impossible or ridiculous.

    With Windows becoming more and more of a DRM crippled, embedded "Media" OS, I, as well as many others are looking for a new way to make and record our music. Personally, I think that BeOS making quite a comeback. I urge you to look into it, and the possibility of supporting or helping out the burgeoning community, which in turn will help you with sales of your hardware.

    The Response:

    Thanks for the email. Right now we're trying to finish up the Mac OSX drivers, which hopefully will be out in a few months. Beware though, Apple changed a lot of things on the G5 so all software and hardware will need some changes. For instance, they changed the PCI bus voltage so normal PCI cards won't work in the G5, they have to be redesigned. So for OSX I'm pretty confident it will be out and work flawlessly, however I can't say for the G5 yet until we get one in here. FYI - many hardware company's have the same issue.

    There are still no plans for Linux of BeOS drivers. They're both great operating systems and we wish more end users would use them, but the cry is for Windows and Mac only, so we have to do those first.

    Aardvark
    www.aardvarkaudio.com

    I would love to see linux and BeOS drivers for this hardware (obviously), and if you are the owner of Aardvark's hardware and reading this, you probably do too.

    Please let them know that you would like to see drivers for linux/BSD/BeOS...

    I know there is other hardware out there that supports linux (and BeOS), but the Q10 is really, really good. I want my cake, and eat it too :)

  2. [Neo] Whoa! [/Neo] by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am impressed by the sheer numbers of Linux apps for audio now available. I suppose the question now remains: how mature are they? Can you rely on them like you can rely on non-Free stuff like Sound Forge and ACID and so on? When this question can be answered in the affirmative, it will be the day I can "deassimilate" my next-to-last Windows PC from the Redmond Collective.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:[Neo] Whoa! [/Neo] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work in a profession studio environment and we've made a pretty complete transition from proprietary software tool, will never go back.

      I like Sweep better than SoundForge: fast, light, looks great, has some extras, _free_. Then there's Ardour, set to release 1.0 in a matter of weeks, fast, stable Pro-tools/Nuendo rplacement, _free_.

      And if you haven't seen it yet, there's also the JACK audio server, perhaps the best thing that has happened to real-time audio ever, allows you to connect I/O to/from any arbitrary applications with low-latency, sample-level precision, and it _free_.

      Other favorites, Audacity, Jack-Rack, Ecasound, Freqtweak, Hydrogen (seq, drum machine), Muse. Have a closer look.

    2. Re:[Neo] Whoa! [/Neo] by Amizell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      24 bit audio file support? Standardized plugins? User interface that won't scare studio clients used to seeing Cubase and Pro Tools? Workable MIDI editing? High resolution file compatibility? Session import so I don't lose access to everything I've ever recorded?

      --
      --- Wherever you go, everyone is always connected...
  3. We're almost there... by soupforare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mostly use Cubase and FLStudio under Win2k/sp2 and am quite pleased with the set up. Low latency drivers, no random crashes or unexpected headaches.
    I use debian for servers at work and at home
    My continued use of Microsoft products, at home, once win2k is left by the wayside is unlikely.
    Hopefully, by then, linux will have more support for custom music hardware and a port of Cubase.
    I want to get my linux boxen out of the closet and into the studio!

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  4. Sound Mixing.... by LamerX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, but when will my computer be able to mix sounds on the fly? I like to hear XMMS playing and have it not tie up the sound card for Xine, or even have it not tie it up for the system beep in KDE. I know that ARTS mixes sounds, but it's too delayed (the sounds play after a 2-3 second delay. Mabye it's just my sound card?

  5. Other multimedia players by Vann_v2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He doesn't mention other, very nice multimedia players like Rhythmbox, JuK, or Zinf. For anyone like me who became frustrated with XMMS' slow development and lack of features these are the things you should check out.

  6. You audio junkies... by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...be sure to test with a 2.6 test kernel to see if things react and work as you would hope and expect! Better to help shake things loose now rather than wait until after 2.6 is finally released.