Slashdot Mirror


Linux 2.4.22 Stable Kernel Released

An anonymous reader writes "Marcelo Tosatti has officially released another stable 2.4 Linux kernel. 2.4.22 was released early this morning and includes a lengthy list of fixes. It follows the last stable kernel in this tree, 2.4.21, by a little over two months."

6 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. NO. NOT UNTIL 2.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That feature is still in development. If you really need it, perhaps you should use Windows 2003 until the 2.6 kernel comes out.

  2. Most important fix. by bfl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kai Makisara:
    o Change Kai Makisara's email address
    I was wondering when someone would get around to this.

  3. Small upgrade fee by DarlFromSCO · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hay, don't forget to pay us the small upgrade license fee.

    --
    IP law confuses me. I am persuaded slashdot readers who read this sig now legally owe me 699$
  4. Re:Kernel design/architecture. by shaitand · · Score: 5, Funny

    ok here is the short:

    Linux = good
    BSD = good
    NT = bad
    proprietary Unix = good but expensive
    BeOS = bad
    Plam = wtf is plam?

    here is a comparison:

    Linux VS NT = linux wins
    bsd vs nt = bsd wins
    anything vs NT = anything wins
    bsd vs linux = linux wins
    proprietary unix vs linux = linux wins but it's a tight race
    bsd vs proprietary unix = bsd wins again a tight race won by price and development model ;)
    plam vs anything = again wtf is plam?

  5. Re:New Kernel doesn't matter here. by deathcow · · Score: 5, Funny
    Love the idea!!

    Darl, doing 24 months hard time, runs into Bubba. -- Darl, meet Bubba, he's a 350 pound homosexual dominatrix, and absolute Linux fanatic. He also admins our prison Linux machines, I mean, ADMIN'D our Linux lab. You see, once SCO started charging Linux licenses, the warden ordered Bubba to remove all Linux and only allowed him to use Microsoft products.

  6. Re:Crypto API by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Funny

    It took some time to explain to the government that the "bad guys" already have access to strong encryption

    you must mean those damn Canadians