Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Native Java JDK 1.3.1 Support For FreeBSD

Posted by simoniker on from the latest-and-greatest-revisited dept.

ap writes "Justin T. Gibbs, of the FreeBSD Foundation, announced today the availability of a native binary release of the Java JDK 1.3.1 for FreeBSD. He also mentioned that more attention will now be focused on providing a release of the 1.4.x JDK. Such developments should allow for FreeBSD to be better suited for enterprise uses."

5 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Stupid Question by boris_the_hacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, this is probably a stupid question that could probably be solved by a little googling, but I shall ask anyway, does this mean that Java can finally be run on FreeBSD or is this just a native port of a JVM (where previous JVM's have been running in some form of emulation) ?

    Is it only now that FreeBSD people can run Java code ?

    Sorry if this is stupid but I have never played with FreeBSD.

    --
    chris at darkrock dot co dot uk
    http colon slash slash www dot darkrock dot co dot uk
    1. Re:Stupid Question by markv242 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, even the compiled-with-patches version of the 1.3 JDK was listed as not being production ready. Therefore, probably not safe to use for your applications.

      If this is truly production ready 1.3 JDK (1.3, guys? Surely you could have gotten 1.4 done in the same time) then FreeBSD is once again a serious Java hosting environment.

  2. Just to be clear by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This doesn't mean that you previously couldn't run Java on FreeBSD. You could previously built a native java binary (though you needed to install the Linux JDK first) or you could run the Linux JDK directly.

    Now the FreeBSD binaries are certified by Sun (which apparently is hard as anything to get done) and they can be distributed directly as a binary.

  3. 1.3.1?? by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is an older version of the JVM which will be missing some classes that are being used by Java programmers. So much for being up to date.

    BTW, why are they only now getting around to offering the Java SDK on BSD? Is there something more difficult about running Java on BSD than on another OS like linux?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  4. Re:Native Java! Now FreeBSDers ... by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Um, those layers of logical infrastructure and indirection are called interfaces and they are there to provide abstractions and encapsulation. Which can be very nice in large systems. I started with bash, perl, c, and PHP, but for rapid development of enterprise apps, Java won out. The only thing _close to J2EE is .NET, which is a complete rip off of J2EE (and a complete mess in places). I've worked on web systems hacked together in Perl using a bunch of CPAN modules, none of it comes close to a real development framework. Not to bash perl or anything, but just because you can do something cool using two non-descriptive characters does not mean you should. I dont get paid for using less keystrokes.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting