Slashdot Mirror


Apple Switches tcsh for bash

gklinger writes "AppleInsider is reporting that Apple has switched from tcsh to bash in the the latest developer build (7B44) of Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther). There is speculation that the switch was made to appeal to Linux users. Experienced users get pretty religious about their shells so what remains to be seen is how diehard tcsh users will react." I don't know about appealing to Linux users in particular, but I just don't know many people who prefers tcsh these days, on any platform. It seems like everyone is using bash or zsh.

6 of 265 comments (clear)

  1. But unless bash... by computerme · · Score: 5, Funny

    also does "ogg vorbis" i predict still more complaining....

  2. It just fits with Apple's focus on usability by ArmorFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    This move fits with Apple's focus on usability. To be usable, you have to be pronounceable, and you have to be memorable.

    bash: nice, violent, memorable name
    tcsh: the city in Belorussia?
    Its a no-brainer, really.

  3. Welcome by DevilM · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new bourne again overlords.

  4. Groovy! by Alex+Reynolds · · Score: 5, Funny

    For a moment there, I thought the headline read: Apple Switches THC for hash...

  5. How will tcsh users react? by jarran · · Score: 5, Funny
    what remains to be seen is how diehard tcsh users will react

    I imagine it will go something along the lines of...

    user@mac:~$ tcsh
    mac:~>

  6. Re:Let's get rid of sendmail too by Suppafly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyway, Apple has enough problems with OS X being RAM-hungry, without enticing people to fill 80MB with a text editor.


    Agreed, using emacs for a simple text editor is like using MS Office as a simple text editor.. Except MS Office is smaller.