Slashdot Mirror


DoS Assaults Underway Against Spam Blocklists

Hiawatha writes "The same sort of denial of service attacks that drove spam blocklist Osirusoft off the Internet are battering many other blocklist services as well." Apparently spammers aren't going to sit by and let people try to ignore their unwanted pitches.

7 of 797 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why does he think it's spammers? by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 1, Troll
    I hate spam with a passion, but words cannot describe my pleasure in seeing these blacklists, especially SPEWS, shut down. They are pure evil in their methods, and largely ineffective against spam while causing massive inconvenience for ISPs and legitimate users of the network.
    Pure evil? So beacuse someone sets up a system to block those servers that allow spam this system becomes pure evil?

    Legitimate users? I guess that you are refering to users that "accidentaly" rents space at the same place as some spam-house. Innefectiv? Yes maybe today, but not when they where updated and cheched?

    All this leads me to the conclucion that since you are defending these spammers so frequently you are probably someone that supports or maybe earns money by harboring spam-bussinesses.

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
  2. THE POST ALTERS THE ARTICLE'S TEXT, MOD IT DOWN by analog_line · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mod it down. I'd heard trolls were doing this. Boston.com isn't even near being slashdotted.

  3. Question for moderators? by jared_hanson · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just how is this comment informative? I mean, let's think about this. I know that we all do not like spammers, but this guy is advocating the mass murder of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people. (I'm hoping he was going for funny, but my beef is with the moderator.)

    I know we live in a time where it seems the answer to everything is to send in firepower. But, let's try and be a little bit more civil on Slashdot. If it's funny, mod it as such. But please don't mod posts advocating killing as informative.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  4. Increase your penis size with Bayesian filters! by Anonymous+Spammer · · Score: 0, Troll
    Bayesian is the only affective method I've seen for significant spam reduction.

    As a professional sender of UCE, I just want to tell you slashdotters to keep on playing with your spam filters. As long as you use spam filters on your e-mail, I can continue to reach my real intended targets, those non-slashdotters who do not know better and will buy my products or click through to my client's websites. Your filters really help cut down on the complaints to the Internet service providers I do business with, and as long as not too many complaints come in their marketing people assure me we can do business. Of course, I still waste your bandwidth and mailbox capacity, but you no longer complain to uce@ftc.gov, my access providers, or anyone else who might cause me problems. My yahoo and hotmail and other accounts for replies are lasting much longer before getting shut down because someone complained to these service providers. And my clients are even reporting that they can start mailing out 800 numbers like 1-800-901-3719 again and they will not have you damn geeks set up your modems to keep autodialing them, since you spend your own time and effort to filter the e-mail and only clueless users who might actually call will see the numbers.

    Please don't bother your Congressmen or Senators proposing legislation that might not work 100%. Just keep on filtering the spam I send you, I know you would have never bought from me anyway. That you can filter legitimizes my business and my waste of your bandwidth.

    P.S. To be sure of not getting a false positive, be sure to send all filtered mail to a special folder. Waste your storage space storing the mail until you manually go through every piece to be sure you didn't accidentally filter something important. Of course, this will take exactly as much effort as it would have to just check the e-mail when it first came in, not to mention the extra effort spent in setting up the filters and the extra space for storing your incoming spam folder, but what the heck. If you think that you can scan e-mail for false positives faster this way you are just fooling yourselves, if you are scanning faster e-mail that you expect to be all spam, you will miss the very false positives that you think you are looking for. And any fales positives that you do catch will have been delayed, perhaps days or more. You geeks enjoy wasting time this way, and I certainly appreciate it. It makes the work of all us spammers much easier. After all, slashdotters like Moderation abuser tell you that Bandwidth is cheap, disk is cheap, CPU is cheap , which is good, because at the rate spammers like me waste it the costs still adds up. I am gald I never pay for it, and I would just as well that everyone else takes the additude that all of the resources I waste are cheap than band together and pass laws against us. No one should care about spam because Bandwidth is cheap, disk is cheap, CPU is cheap and it is your job to filter it.

    Think you've seen this before? Don't complain. Just go through lots more work to set up special filers on your computer so that you will not see it again. Crawl into your holes, let us attack the real problems we have in getting our spam to the clueless marks that will respond. You should have to do that. It's the true geek solution, and I would really like it if you did.

    --
    No Karma is given if one is modded up "funny".
  5. Re:Why does he think it's spammers? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 2, Troll
    primarily because of excessively-ambitious analogies

    Ok. No analogies.

    Fuck you you SPEWS assholes! You blocked a perfect ISP for me.

    I regard SPEWS as pure terrorism and I keep reporting you to the feds as such. Maybe some day they'll crack down on you.

    I'd rather have spam than you.

  6. No, this message is not offtopic! by TheMidget · · Score: 0, Troll
    at least not to the thread at hand.

    Here you go: trojan arses

  7. God What a waste. by RevSmiley · · Score: 0, Troll

    Another clueless lament by blocklist worshipers decrying the "obvious attack by spammers." To yet another blocklist.

    Please allow users to decide what is spam and what is not. I can take care of my own email filtering and spam filtering.

    If you claim I am a spammer because you disagree with me you better be able to prove it. You can't I am not.

    The solution to this problem is end to end ip tracking not blocklists.

    --
    As you can see I don't care about my karma.