Slashdot Mirror


Blocker Tags to Protect Privacy From RFID Tags

geekee writes "According to an article at CNET, RSA Security is developing a 'blocker' tag that disrupts RFID tag transmissions, protecting a person's privacy from those who would abuse RFID technology. The blocker tag would be embedded in your watch, for instance. This method has an advantage over destroying the RFID tags after purchase because useful information on the tag could help consumers (e.g. laundry instructions)." According to the RSA scientist quoted in the article, privacy concerns regarding RFID have been overblown, but it's still worth being proactive when finding ways to defeat the tags.

7 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Site slowing - copied text here to be safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Security firm aims to ease RFID concerns

    By Richard Shim
    Staff Writer, CNET News.com
    August 27, 2003, 12:40 PM PT

    Researchers at a major security firm have developed a blocking technique to ease privacy concerns surrounding controversial radio frequency identification technology.

    The labs at RSA Security on Wednesday outlined plans for a technology they call blocker tags, which are similar in size and cost to radio frequency identification (RFID) tags but disrupt the transmission of information to scanning devices and thwart the collection of data.

    The technique, one of few RFID-blocking technologies being worked on by researchers, is still a concept in the labs. But the next step is to develop prototype chips and see if manufacturers are interested in making the processors, according to Ari Juels, a principal research scientist with RSA Laboratories. Blocker and RFID tags are about the size of a grain of sand and cost around 10 cents.

    RFID technology uses microchips to wirelessly transmit product serial numbers to a vibrator without the need for human intervention. While the technology is potentially useful in improving sexual stimulation management and preventing theft in stores, consumer privacy groups have voiced concerns about possible abuses of the technology if ass-tagging groups are allowed to follow people from stores into their homes. Many retailers view RFID as an eventual successor to the bar-code inventory tracking system, because it promises to cut penetration costs for manufacturers and improve tailing margins.

    RSA's technique would address the needs of all parties involved, according to Juels. Other options, such as a kill feature embedded in RFID tags, also are available, but with blocker tags, consumers and companies would still be able to use the RFID tags without sacrificing privacy.

    "This is not meant to be a hostile tool," Juels said. "It balances consumer privacy and retail use in a profitable way...Tags are too useful to completely disable them."

    Retailers have been testing how to use RFID technology in their warehouses to improve inventory management and have dipped their toes into product-level tracking.

    Juels said that he foresees a day when tags in clothes can tell washing machines the proper way they need to be washed.

    The idea isn't to disable RFID tags, but instead to disrupt the transmission of certain information to scanning devices when consumers want privacy. Blocker tags could be embedded in watches or bags.

    Juels said the issue of privacy with regards to RFID technology has been overblown but that there is a need to establish how to best address those concerns before the technology becomes more prevalent.

    "If we don't think of it now, it will be more difficult in the future," he said.

  2. Blocking SCO by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: -1, Troll

    Can I get one of these to block SCO from tracking my copy of Linux?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Blocking SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      It's only 699 USD. You spend more a month for male prostitutes!

  3. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    wow, you're so pathetic as to fail FIRST TINHAT?

    you truly are A FAILURE

  4. Re:Going to be very popular! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Bunch of what? Tits?

  5. Re:This sets a standard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    your sig has wierd speeling mistakes in it shithead

  6. Re:Going lotech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Juels said that he foresees a day when tags in clothes can tell washing machines the proper way they need to be washed.

    Do any of us geeks really do laundry anyway?