SCO Says It Has No Plan To Sue Linux Companies

cadfael writes "SCO is reported in the Age as saying they 'Have no plans to sue Linux companies...' This seems to contradict the earlier statements of Chris Sontag. This story also points out how Canopy owns stakes in several other Linux companies, including Linux Networx wheich supplied the supercomputer for Lawrence Livermore Nat Lab. One begins to wonder if the reality of their situation has become clear to them?" Maybe, just maybe, this is the beginning of the end of this mess.

Comments

Not quite

[davmoo]

I've seen several comments to the effect of SCO is not consistent in their actions.

I'm sorry to say that yes they are very consistant. Their statements consistently look like the ramblings of a bunch of inbred morons who have no concept of what is right or the truth. They also consistently lie to their stock holders in order to inflate the price of their otherwise worthless company. SCO Unix was irrelevant when it was the original SCO. It is even less relevant now. My two dogs taking a dump contribute more to Linux, free software, and the General Good of the World than SCO Unix ever will. Instead of "Santa Cruz Operation", SCO should change its name to something more realistic and honest, like maybe "Some Crummy Obsolete Unix". If Darl McButtmonkey and his fellow retards (I started to call them stooges, but that is insulting to all the other stooges in the world) would spend some time actually working on a decent product they would not have to turn to lies and baseless threats to pump up their stock values.

Hey McButtmonkey, I use Linux commercially, and I've got a hundred bucks that says you don't have the balls to sue me for it...especially since eunuchs like you don't have balls.