Slashdot Mirror


Microcomputers for Homebrew Projects?

tengwar asks: "Way back when I was at university, I did a course on microcomputers which went into enough detail to design, build and program a Z80-based system - more or less state of the art at the time. Now that my lecture notes are firmly embedded in the Carboniferous layer, I'd like to have a go at doing this with a more modern chip, and I wondered what's available. I'm not brilliant at electronics, and I liked the way the Z80 peripheral chips integrated easily with the CPU. Obviously I'm not looking to just slot together the latest PC motherboard with the latest Pentium, but I'd need to go for something where the board design won't get too complicated, which probably rules out processors with full 32-bit external interfaces on space grounds. I'm not really concerned about performance, but it would be nice to be able to port a JRE to it rather than working entirely in assembler. Any thoughts on suitable starting points?"

11 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. Atmel AVR by glassesmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not sure if anything short of Pentium/Athlon would be state of the art enough, but I'd recommend the Atmel AVR. Firstly, there are lots of demo/examples with it and existing software archives exist.
    This processor is used in some smart-sensor applications where you have distributed sensors.
    Here's a 1998 EDN mag review and some simm circuit boards which make project computers.

  2. Not that easy by keesh · · Score: 3, Informative

    One of the reasons you won't get modern CPUs to work on hand-made boards is the length of connections. With the z80, you can trim wires by hand and it'll still work quite happily; with faster CPUs, though, you need to be far more precise with the length of the wires / tracks connecting the CPU to memory and the like. At speeds of over a few MHz, even a mm difference is more than enough to screw things up...

  3. microcontrollers by wotevah · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you forget about java and a VGA display, you can do a lot of fun things in C with a single microcontroller chip. Microchip makes an entire range of fairly cheap, very low-power microcontrollers, flash- or one-time programmable. There are also other companies that make enhanced versions of the venerable 80C51 such as the Philips 80C552 with integrated A/D converters and PWM outputs although depending on your soldering/wrapping abilities you might not want to use them as they have quite a few pins!

    Microcontrollers are extremely small, low-powered devices containing a CPU, some code/data memory peripheral interfaces. You might have seen them at work in your preferred game station mod chip...

    I think Motorola, AMD and Intel also have a line of powerful 68xxx- and x86-, respectively, -based microcontrollers that might be closer to the capabilities of a PC processor.

    There are also some chips that you can program in Basic (ugh) via a small interpreter in their boot code. It really depends on what you are planning to do.

    1. Re:microcontrollers by Judg3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another good thing about Microchip.com: http://sample.microchip.com/.
      Pick up to 5 items and have em FedEx'ed to your home. It's a great way to check out a new chip you where wondering about, and not spend the money on it. Granted, it's only 5-25$ per piece, but that's 5-25$ you might waste if you get a new chip to play with and end up toasting it.

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  4. Well by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

    PIC, or AVR generally is where you should start. There's really no way around working in either Assembly or C if you want to do anything serious with it.

    To go to a more powerful CPU gets you into all the stuff you don't want to get into, like critical and complex board layouts.

    There's BASIC compilers, but you aren't going to get very far before you run into some serious limitations if you want to do anything complex.

    Good luck on the JRE thing, something like that is way too slow and bloated to run on a hobbiest CPU. I think sun made a chip that executed bytecode, but I don't think they make them anymore.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  5. This is what I've done.... by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using Jave modules for a while...both from DalSemi/MAXIM (the "TINI", http://www.ibutton.com) and Imsys (the "SNAP", http://www.imsys.se).

    They provide a JRE environment (JDK1.1.3 in the case of TINI, J2ME CLDC 1.0 in the case of SNAP) and allow me not to worry about processor and memory design etc.

    Right now, my SNAP module lives in a custom extuded aluminum enclosure I designed, and has a MMC interfaced for it (an extra 16Mbytes of removable storage), and a bunch of other things like temperature/humidity sensors, LEDs, an LCD, and dry contact sensors.

    One reason I like both these modules is that they support I2C, SPI and 1-wire for expansion....meaning that you don't have to necessarily hang stuff off the CPU's data bus.

    Good luck.

    -psy

    1. Re:This is what I've done.... by tengwar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, for actually getting stuff done I like the TINI - nice to work with and very cheap. I've not tried the SNAP but I've heard good things about it. However they're basically ready-built whereas in this case I'm interested in building from the CPU up - I suppose mainly to see if it can still be done.

  6. Where to start by jcwren · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you *really* want a JRE (which is generally not synonymous with performance, in the microcontroller world), check out the TINI from Dallas Semiconductor, here.

    If you want to get into heavier duty gear (and available only in surface mount), you can look at things like the Patriot from PTSC, here. There are also several others that I've seen, but can't recall the name of. A little Googling should find those.

  7. Motorola Dragonball? by innosent · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want a processor, and not just a microcontroller, but still want it fairly simple, you might want to check Motorola's Dragonball chips. It sounds like you want something with a low pin count, and simple ISA, so that'd be my first suggestion, followed very closely by ARM.

    If you want a microcontroller, then maybe the 68HCxx series, or a RISC-ish PIC. The 68HCxx series is probably the most popular there, and you can easily find code and design samples for them.

    --
    --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
  8. HC12 by epine · · Score: 3, Informative


    I had to get back into microcontrollers, after a long absence (since the days when the 6809 was state of the art).

    I decided to go with the Motorola HC12. Unlike the HC11, it runs compiled C code with reasonable efficiency (gcc supported), it's highly integrated, and you have a simple execution model (not very many registers, etc.) when debugging by hand. It's reasonably capable, and almost trivial to design your own project board (clock frequencies within reason, few external components required, every kind of I/O pin conceivable).

    The more powerful versions have huge amounts of internal FLASH (256K), but not quite as much internal memory as I would like (8K is typical of recent versions).

    There are cheap modules available from Technological Arts in Toronto. They don't seem to be very active this year with new designs, but they continue to supply their product line to local colleges last I checked.

    Anything more complex than an HC12 I think I would want some kind of kernel OS. The next step up the food chain, in our evaluation, was an Atmel chip.

  9. actually pretty easy by dutky · · Score: 3, Informative
    Check out my journal for some discussion of exactly how to do such a thing. The first bit of advice is that you should consider a microcontroller as the heart of the system. There are lots of good candidates out there: PPC, ARM, and MIPS devices are common. You might be able to find some x86 based devices as well.

    Many of the current MCUs are ball grid array (BGA) devices, which make them pretty hard to work with if you're not a professional, but a few can be had in PLCC or QFP packages, which means you can get an adapter board or socket.

    You can also buy preassembled demo/development boards (this is the route I'm taking) and wire-up anything the board doesn't include by hand. Most of the MCUs on the market will have 32-bit memory busses (though they may not support more that 25 or 26 address lines), so you can attach just about anything you want to them.

    This is exactly the kind of thing that Steve Ciarcia (of Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar) used to do: building personal computers from microcontrollers. Most of his designs used Z80 based devices, which was fine back in the mid- to late-eighties. Now, however, you can do a fair bit better.

    As for speed, I don't know exactly what you're looking for, but the ARM devices can be had in speeds from 50MHz to 400MHz, and the same is true of the PPC and MIPS devices. That may not seem like much, compared to a 2GHz Pentium, but it's really quite nice.

    Some good resources: Digi-Key is a reasonable source for all sorts of parts, Atmel makes some nice MCUs, programmable logic, and Flash RAM, Cirrus Logic makes some ARM MCUs and networking chips (amoung other things), Sharp, Samsung, Motorola, and AMD all make nice MCUs, Cogent Computers builds some nice development boards, and EarthLCD has good prices on LCDs and has an ARM based board in the works.