Microsoft vs. Burst.com
rocketjam writes "Robert X. Cringley has an interesting story on one of Microsoft's many little-known legal cases. Burst.com is suing Microsoft, claiming MS negotiated in bad faith for over a year before stealing Burst's patented technology for increasing the efficiency of video and audio streaming. After Microsoft submitted all emails associated with the their dealings with Burst to the court, Burst's lawyers discovered a 35-week gap of missing mail during a critical portion of the negotiations. When the judge learned the Sun vs. Microsoft antitrust case had revealed that MS keeps backups of all emails on over 100,000 tapes stored offsite, he ordered them to come up with the missing messages."
Yeah, but they're probably better at keeping backups of email than the *snicker* Clinton White House. heh.
A Good Intro to NetBS
No one is denying the companies talked. What you will find in those letters is a sort of dissemblance I would believe.
Huh? (This is not grammar nazi mod material, I'm truly baffled as to what you mean.)
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the Dictionary search box to the right.
Suggestions for dissemblance:
1. dissemblers
2. dissembling
3. disassembles
4. dissembled
5. dissembles
6. disemboweled
7. disembowelled
8. dissembler
9. disembowels
10. disassemble
everything in moderation