Slashdot Mirror


Finally A Major-Brand Desktop With Linux, Not Windows

Fugwidzard writes "Sounds like an okay box from HP at an okay price, the NewsForge review says, but no modem, and even optional modems are Winmodems although they say they have Linux drivers for them. Plus it's not a true Linux preload - they give you a couple of Mandrake CDs and you're on your own, no support. Better than paying Microsoft tax, anyway, and a step in the right direction for HP. Supposedly they're going to have all their PCs 'Linux certified' in the near future. I hope other big PC mills do the same."

8 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. Itanium Workstations with Linux Preloaded by DaRat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We have a few of the HP Itanium workstations that came with Red Hat Linux preloaded, so they are selling some machines with Linux preloaded on them. Of course, for $8k+, they'd better come with the OS preloaded, right? ;-)

  2. Why bother? by kannibul · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Until a major player like HP can offer tech support and an actual pre-load, Linux will still be limited to the more hard-core user.

    Anyone who would be using Linux, at least in the USA, would just build thier own system, download Linux off the net (or even buy the retail box of the OS) and have a higher performance/price system.

    The whole reason why I would ever buy a retail computer would be for the warranty. Now for the common joe-user out there, the warranty and support is something they need.
    Put Linux on that system, then what's the point if there isn't support, let alone pre-installation.

  3. Too bad it's a "budget" PC by FileNotFound · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's cheap budget PC. I mean the most RAM it can have is 256Mb...40G 5.4kRPM hd...yay.

    I really dislike how Linux keeps getting labeled as the "cheap" solution to Windows. Yes it's cheaper than windows but thats not the ONLY advatange.

    I hated how AMD was viewed exactly in the same way when compared to Intel. "The cheaper solution.."

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
  4. Maybe if it were a laptop... by evanhr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not really chomping at the bit to pay HP to put a desktop box together so I can run Linux on it. If I'm gonna master the installation and configuration of the OS, why wouldn't I be willing to assemble a barebones system? I want a new computer to be either easy or cheap; this isn't either.

  5. Why? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Factory machines are WAY over-priced to begin with. Existing Linux users already know the benefit of piecing a machine together themselves and how much it shaves off the price.

    2. If they are trying to attract "new" computer users (or users who aren't as experienced) to Linux, they're in for quite a surprise when they get massive amounts of returns. "Hey, none of my existing software works with this.. This machine is going back to the store!"

    Maybe I'm missing something here, but it seems like this would only benefit in corporate environments where they need to use Linux and don't have time to piece together machines.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  6. Re:Tier One Support? by Rinikusu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    LOL. That sounds exactly like Tier One support from Dell.
    --old timer mode
    So, I get this call. A guy just got his modem replaced, but it's a different model/manufacturer than his previous winmodem. No floppy or CD containing driver, driver not available on the Win98 CD. M'kay..
    "Now sir, you're going to have to, uh, download the drivers for your new modem from our support site.."

    It was calls like that that made me not want to be a call-tech anymore. I truly felt sorry for the bastards.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  7. Is it happening finally? by devphaeton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it just me, or is the tide really starting to turn in the last couple of months? I realise /. focuses on these things, but there seems to have been a lot of articles lately about major organizations, militaries, governments, school systems and the like straight-up turning thier back on Microsoft in favour of GNU/Linux or OSS.. (and even starting from scratch a la Japan/China/Taiwan).

    Is Microsoft really starting to lose thier grip? Will we look back 5 years from now and chuckle about how MS had such domination, but by then they will be less relevant? With Microsoft "out of the way", will this allow other OS startups (not linux or bsd types) to flourish? I.e. will BeOS get re-invented as a commercial product? Plan9? Something brand new?

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  8. I tried a d220 when they were still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... the silver-front box with the Compaq logo on it. We got one of the very first demo units from our local Compaq sales rep before HP rebranded and recolored the boxes. They had something in the BIOS that prevented either SuSE 8 or Redhat 8 CDROM disks from even booting up. I tried the floppy-based installation and Linux would install, but both LILO and Grub would try to start the kernel and it would then freeze up solid after the kernel uncompressed and tried to start. I put the Windows XP Pro cdrom back into the machine and the re-installation of XP went as normal and the machine worked fine. I asked our salesrep about this and he said that the BIOS on these demo machines was deliberately written to not run Linux due to some agreement with you-know-who.