TV "Broadcasting" Over Wireless Networks?
nuggetman asks: "This year we're starting an in-high-school TV network. What we would like to do is be able to broadcast from anywhere in the building using our wireless 802.11b network. In doing some tests at home, I discovered 802.11b has enough bandwidth to allow me to send live video at VHS quality (320x240 29.97fps) w/ FM quality audio when using Windows Media encoder on the sending end, and Windows Media Player at full screen on the receiving end. When applied in school, the receiving computer would simply output the full screen display to a TV signal. Are there any other free (as beer) solutions that would let us do this, other than WMP?"
- If you have access to a Mac, then QuickTime Broadcaster would be an excellent choice, as it supports broadcast and multicast, so you can have several machines playing the same stream without duplicating data.
- If you have access to a Unix like system (Linux, OSX, FreeBSD, Solaris, Irix, HPUX, etc...) then mpeg4ip should let you do much of what QuickTime Broadcaster does, with a bit more hassle.
Some other choices would be:- Live Channel
- Sorenson Broadcaster
- Real Encoder
and probably many more.Nullsoft developed NSV, nullsoft streaming video.
It can use a regular shoutcast server and winamp to play it.
It's a bit poorly documented, but any geek should be able to figure it out. It can play a set of files in a loop, do live feeds, etc.
http://www.nullsoft.com/nsv/
You'll probably find that, even with light traffic, 802.11b is going to be too slow and unrealiable for 30fps streaming video...
Since you are going to output to a TV anyway, why bother with computers/802.11b and broadcast directly using a small TV transmitter. I would have expected Ramsey to have a transmitter kit, but all they seem to have these days is a semi-cheesey 'cube' transmitter. Even so, the high powered version might be good enough for what you are looking for, especially with a good antenna.
A quick Google search turned up some other kits. Most of these have a fairly short range, but with good antennas, they'll easily transmit further (and with higher quality), than compressed video over 802.11b. Plus, if you get a kit, building it can be a nice little project for an electronically minded student.
just because I like linux so much I'll pretend that you have linux...
l
Check out: http://www.videolan.org/
The player works on lots of platforms including windows but the server has to be linux. Now that's fine with me. I'm wondering about Digital Video and digital editing too...
You may also look at these links:
http://cs.uhh.hawaii.edu/~jeschke/links/video.htm
This fella has made a pretty good collection of links that he's researched. Hey, I'm interested in this idea now... I think I may have an idea for a project.
[signature]
Is there a /. culture FAQ out there somewhere that documents this, the "in Soviet Russia [object] [verb] [subject]" thing, and the "1. xxx, 2. ?, 3. Profit!" spiel?
1. in soviet Russia.... a tired Yakov Smirnov bit.
2. the "step 1: xxx, 2: ? 3: Profit!" spiel is from the underpants gnomes episode of South Park. In the episode, the underpants gnomes explain their business model:
Step 1: Collect underpants
Step 2:
Step 3: Profit!
Incorrect. You do not get 11Mbps. You get 5.5... full duplex. Or so. You end up with at most about 4Mbits of usable bandwidth with 802.11b in my experience.