Rutans' X-prize Entry Tested In Re-Entry Configuration
evenprime writes "Burt Rutan's X-Prize entry has completed another drop test. This is the second drop over-all, and the first with its wings locked into their re-entry position. The flight results are here."
Scoll down to the bottom to get to the newest pictures. Hope the server doesn't get hammered.
Now if I could just get a laptop that would survive a drop-test from 47,000 feet...
"Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney
If I worked for NASA, I might consider a change of employer.
It almost sounds like:
"Lock your X-foils in attack position"...
I don't think Carmack is going to win the X-prize.
If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
Very little has slowed down Mr. Rutan from anything he wants to accomplish. This is a great accomplishment as all others he has worked on.
I eat my grapes at room temperature, cuz the cold ones hurt my teeth
How come this seems to be the only project that's getting any attention?
;-))
Is it because it's the only one that's doing anything? Or is it more like it's the only one that's making all their results public?
(or quite possibly, in true slashdot tradition, it could be just because it's the one that looks the coolest?
(Spudley Strikes Again!)
Its interesting how well this picture depicts perfectly the dynamics of geekdom - the clear indictation is located 6 persons from the left.
24 geeks, 2 super duper flying machines, one hot chick.
--"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
..are hot
The Singularity is closer than you think
Quant
I wouldn't bet against:
My mother
A nun
Paul MacCready
Gene Krantz
Steve Case until 2001
Steve Jobs 1977-1983 & 2001-2003
Any of the Rutans
It just ain't smart.
"Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
From the mission summary:
These early flights are all well and good, but:
1) They are low altitude flights
2) They are low airspeed flights
This is the easy corner of the flight envelope. The spacecraft will eventually have to go Mach 2+ and handle re-entry conditions. That will be the real test. The reasons I don't have a high degree of confidence they'll pull it off are:
1) Only CFD was used for design and analysis, no wind tunnel testing. This is a cardinal sin. Orbital Sciences has been burned twice for doing this, once on the first flight of the Pegasus XL, and recently on the first flight of the X-43A.
2) The thermal protection system consists of an ablative paint over the composite structure. Such a system has never been used on a re-entry vehicle. I do not believe it will provide sufficient protection.
3) The high-drag re-entry configuration, with a potentially inaccurate aerodynamics model, could put the vehicle in a vastly different re-entry trajectory than planned. The vehicle could be subjected to thermal and aerodynamic loads far greater than anticipated.
4) There are areas of the high speed/high altitude flight envelope that you can't just bite off one piece at a time. There can be uncontrollable speed/altitude regions in the flight envelope that require careful trajectory planning to avoid. Chuck Yeager found one of these regions in the NF-104A, that lead to a near fatal loss of control.
Yes, I know what I'm talking about. I'm an aerospace engineer.
I think Rutan and Carmack are receiving approximately equal coverage.
/. occasionally. At least one of their employees is a /. reader and poster. XCor is odd - Their goals are suborbital flight, but they have not stated any intentions of winning the X-Prize. (XCor and the X-Prize have no relation.)
Carmack because of his fame within the community, Rutan because of his track record in aviation.
Burt Rutan is aviation's equivalent of John Carmack. A genius who is a leader and driving force within his field.
Someone else commented that he would not ever bet against either of the Rutans. (Burt is an amazing designer, Dick Rutan is an amazing test pilot.)
XCor also gets coverage on
retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
" 1) Only CFD was used for design and analysis, no wind tunnel testing. This is a cardinal sin. Orbital Sciences has been burned twice for doing this, once on the first flight of the Pegasus XL, and recently on the first flight of the X-43A."
It's a known fact that Rutan is not in any way a proponent of windtunnel testing, and I'm not sure if ANY of his designs were windtunnel tested before first flight.
Despite this, his track record is stellar. Burt Rutan is someone you don't want to bet against.
retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
Re point 2, I feel it's somewhat inaccurate to compare a Mach 2 descent from 100,000m to the type of re-entry experienced by Shuttles and near-orbital ICBM warheads. SpaceShipOne travels at much lower velocity, and there's much less energy to be dissipated. Is there any reason why the heat situation will be any worse than that suffered by high performance supersonic jets flying at Mach 2?
With that childhood memory, I always wonder about the Rutans and about sibling rivalry and all that.