Rutans' X-prize Entry Tested In Re-Entry Configuration
evenprime writes "Burt Rutan's X-Prize entry has completed another drop test. This is the second drop over-all, and the first with its wings locked into their re-entry position. The flight results are here."
Scoll down to the bottom to get to the newest pictures. Hope the server doesn't get hammered.
Now if I could just get a laptop that would survive a drop-test from 47,000 feet...
"Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney
If I worked for NASA, I might consider a change of employer.
Very little has slowed down Mr. Rutan from anything he wants to accomplish. This is a great accomplishment as all others he has worked on.
I eat my grapes at room temperature, cuz the cold ones hurt my teeth
How come this seems to be the only project that's getting any attention?
;-))
Is it because it's the only one that's doing anything? Or is it more like it's the only one that's making all their results public?
(or quite possibly, in true slashdot tradition, it could be just because it's the one that looks the coolest?
(Spudley Strikes Again!)
Its interesting how well this picture depicts perfectly the dynamics of geekdom - the clear indictation is located 6 persons from the left.
24 geeks, 2 super duper flying machines, one hot chick.
--"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
..are hot
The Singularity is closer than you think
Quant
From the mission summary:
These early flights are all well and good, but:
1) They are low altitude flights
2) They are low airspeed flights
This is the easy corner of the flight envelope. The spacecraft will eventually have to go Mach 2+ and handle re-entry conditions. That will be the real test. The reasons I don't have a high degree of confidence they'll pull it off are:
1) Only CFD was used for design and analysis, no wind tunnel testing. This is a cardinal sin. Orbital Sciences has been burned twice for doing this, once on the first flight of the Pegasus XL, and recently on the first flight of the X-43A.
2) The thermal protection system consists of an ablative paint over the composite structure. Such a system has never been used on a re-entry vehicle. I do not believe it will provide sufficient protection.
3) The high-drag re-entry configuration, with a potentially inaccurate aerodynamics model, could put the vehicle in a vastly different re-entry trajectory than planned. The vehicle could be subjected to thermal and aerodynamic loads far greater than anticipated.
4) There are areas of the high speed/high altitude flight envelope that you can't just bite off one piece at a time. There can be uncontrollable speed/altitude regions in the flight envelope that require careful trajectory planning to avoid. Chuck Yeager found one of these regions in the NF-104A, that lead to a near fatal loss of control.
Yes, I know what I'm talking about. I'm an aerospace engineer.