Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Offers Amnesty to File Sharers

Mister Dre writes "Apparently, the RIAA is planning to offer amnesty to file sharers who promise to delete copyrighted material from their computers. To take advantage, of course, you 'have to send a completed, notarized amnesty form to the RIAA, with a copy of a photo ID.'" Hey RIAA, how about I just stop sharing files, and we call it even? I know I own most of the CDs for the files I listen to, but I stopped buying those too so you'll know where I stand.

7 of 789 comments (clear)

  1. Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Take the offer.

    Your asshole will thank you for not getting it raped every night, and your wallet will thank you for the same reason.

  2. Re:At the end of the day by C10H14N2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Respond to consumer demand. They used to bitch that they couldn't use newer technology because of the consumer's expense in upgrade path (LP->8 track->cassette->cd->?). Now that consumers have spent (insert illegally downloaded mp3 of Carl Sagan) BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars buying the equipment for the next format and the government with other private industry has spent further BILLIONS AND BILLIONS to build the distribution infrastructure, they refuse to step up to the plate with a viable business model. SCREW 'EM.

  3. Re:No determination at all by LazloToth · · Score: 1, Troll



    "The majority of people involved with sharing still care about music."

    Hmmmm . . . I'd say that's a stretch. Probably more accurate to say that this "majority" just likes to acquire other peoples' property without paying for it, don't you think? Really now, this isn't a complicated issue, as much as "sharers" would like to make it one. This is about treating a non-essential item - - music - - as if it were water or air that we must have in order to live. File traders seem to think that they can demonize the record industry by suggesting that it gouges listeners and treats musicians life offal. But the truth is that music is like any other non-essential item that people buy: if you can afford it, you may choose to buy it. If you can't, you don't, or you acquire it illegally and take your chances on getting caught.

    How can one pity the Winona Ryders of the world, who steal $1000 scarves because they think they can do so with impunity? Who can feel sorry for the "super sharers" that the RIAA is reaming - - the ones who thought they were making a stand, when they were merely breaking the law? If it were electricity you were stealing because your children were freezing, I could give you some slack. But people who just want to fill their MP3 players with pirated tunes deserve the same thing that cable TV thieves get - - a harder slap than they ever expected.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  4. Re:Can't WAIT to get the address to send my "info" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    goatse.cx is a good source of photos for the photo IDs.

  5. oral sex with my girlfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Greetings, Slashdotters. What follows it the true story of my first sexual experience. Being a typical Slashdot nerd, I never had much luck with females. That all changed my Sophomore year in high school when I met an attractive nerd girl that actually took some interest in me. We dated on and off for a while, but by my Senior year of high school (back in 2000), we had a pretty serious relationship. And so it came to pass that in October of 2000, I had oral sex performed on me for the first time, by my seventeen year old girlfriend.

    Now, of course, I had imagined what it would feel like, and I had watched a lot of porno and did a fair amount of masturbation, but the spectacular sensations of oral sex had really surprised me. As she sucked my cock for the first time, I was amazed by how much pleasure the warmth and the wetness gave me. Granted, she was inexperienced at this point and a little nervous, but things improved with time. One of the things that that I really enjoyed was, after sucking for a while, she'd stop for a bit and rub her face on my cock. The sensation of my already moist member rubbing against the smooth skin of her face was absolutely incredible.

    Eventually, she became, and still is, quite the eager cocksucker. In fact, she has even swallowed a few times. The first time, we were lying on my bed watching a Twilight Zone marathon. Eventually, she must have gotten a little bored with that because she slipped under the covers and started rubbing her head in my lap, getting me aroused, which didn't take very long. She pulled out my cock, and began sucking vigorously while I watched Twilight Zone... truly a geek's paradise! Anyway, it didn't take long before I felt myself reaching climax, and at this point I reached down to pull her off of my cock, but much to my surprise she pushed my hand away and took my whole load in her mouth. She kept her mouth on my cock for a while, holding my hot load in her mouth, enjoying the role of a cocksucking slut.

    An interesting thing about my girlfriend is that she enjoys sexual role-play, in a sense. She often asks me to force her to deep-throat my cock, and to slap her face a bit and tug on her hair. At first, I was a little surprised and even scared to do this, but after a while I found it rather enjoyable to feel so much control over my girlfriend. Besides, it's all play.

    Anyway, our relationship is still going strong, as is the cocksucking... she can't seem to get enough of it! I am, however, a little disappointed that she refuses to let me penetrate her virgin cunt. This is mostly due to fear of pregnancy, though. She doesn't seem to trust condoms too much. I guess I can understand her paranoia about the risk, and I certainly don't want children either, but I would really enjoy the feel of my cock inside her tight, moist little cunt. Maybe someday...

  6. Re:Why is downloading music unethical? by Rogerborg · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bushethics: because we damn well can.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  7. Re:Random + Illegal = Legal? by bmetzler · · Score: 0, Troll
    Sure is the original file still under copyright but not the two file that are spread around.

    Huh? I don't understand. So, if I printed a Stephen King novel in the middle of my thesis on cryptography, I am not breaking any copyright laws by then distributing the whole work?

    -Brent