Slashdot Mirror


Taiwan Under Cyber Attack from China

An anonymous reader writes: "O'Reilly Developer News is reporting this morning that Taipei is under cyber attack by a Chinese 'army of hackers'. The Taipei government is saying that the attacks are trojan-horses against windows machines that are being staged to break in to government databases."

24 of 646 comments (clear)

  1. Tom Clancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is extremely interesting. In his book "The Bear and the Dragon" this is exactly what happened, only it was China and Russia.

    COULD THINGS GO NUCLEAR!?!?

    It's pronounced nu-cu-lar.

    WHATEVER!

    1. Re:Tom Clancy by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does Taiwan have nukes?

      Tom Clancy makes me insane. Whenever theres some sort of political or military conflict, all the CNNs and FOX News stations scramble to get Clancy to come on and comment. And he has no military or political experience, just a vivid imagination. They ask him all kinds of technical questions, like in Afghanistan they're asking him about the range of shoulder fired missiles and how many the Taliban have, and he's giving answers like "42" matter-of-factly.

      It's ridiculous. What's next, getting Dennis Miller to be color man on Monday Night Football? Oh wait

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Tom Clancy by KFT · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Tom Clancy makes me insane. Whenever theres some sort of political or military conflict, all the CNNs and FOX News stations scramble to get Clancy to come on and comment. And he has no military or political experience, just a vivid imagination.
      I agree that his books aren't exactly high literature and you do have a point there. But Clancy does have - or is said to have - more access to the military than you will ever get. And as 95,3434% of the slashdot-population knows, he did write a book about a plane hitting the capitol.
      That Clancy is popular doesn't mean it's fair to dismiss his work as totally unrelated to political and military reality.
    3. Re:Tom Clancy by JonathanX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But Clancy does have - or is said to have - more access to the military than you will ever get.

      This is a fact. I was a member of the 26th MEU(SOC) onboard the USS WASP when Clancy was doing research for his book, "Marine. A guided Tour of a Marine Expeditionary Unit" (ISBN: 0425154548) and I can tell you without a doubt that he had access to all levels of the unit, both during training and real world operations. I can't remember exactly how long he was there, but it was at least a week or two. Trust me, 99% of what the man writes is accurate. He does his homework.He's also a super nice guy.

  2. Trojan, or propaganda? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now please, don't flame me as a fan of mainland China's repressive regime. But the Taiwanese government doesn't exactly have the world's best track record, as I recall. I hear occasional notes about "problems" with civil rights, and then there's the whole pirated anime problem.

    So when I read this line:

    "National intelligence has indicated that an army of hackers based in China..."

    my BS-o-Meter starts clicking. Though the article is non-technical, it includes other notes that make the meter tick faster:

    "...has successfully spread 23 different Trojan horse programs... 10 private high-tech companies... break into at least 30 different government agencies and 50 private companies," Cabinet Spokesman Lin Chia-lung said yesterday.

    We have a lot of big, scary numbers... but no hard information about the programs, the companies, or the government agencies.

    In fact, the "23 different Trojans" makes me think that the government cabinet member is talking out of his butt. More likely, nobody's been running virus protection, and those 24 Trojans are simply members of F-Secure's wildlist.

    Then, there's this "helpful" suggestion:

    "If there's any lesson from this experience, it is not to use software developed in China or hire Chinese computer programmers, because you're running the risk of having the software you use implanted with the Trojan-horse program," he said.

    That sounds like nothing more than the usual tit-for-tat barbs that Taiwan and China have been throwing across the strait for decades. In fact, I suspect that's what this whole Trojan Horse issue is -- all bluster, no substance.

    And finally, off the actual topic: let's watch the Slashdot effect in action! When I first hit the Taipei Times article, it included this text at the bottom:
    This story has been viewed 1128 times.

    By the time I typed this comment, the number had not changed, so I'm probably getting a cached copy. What did it show when you hit it?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Trojan, or propaganda? by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That sounds like nothing more than the usual tit-for-tat barbs that Taiwan and China have been throwing across the strait for decades. In fact, I suspect that's what this whole Trojan Horse issue is -- all bluster, no substance.

      However, we should not be complacent about China. I am certainly not one for warmongering but given the U.S. financial involvement in Taiwan (odds are the computer you are typing on was made there), if China ever does do anything more than little experimental probes then we will inexorably be drawn in to a conflict. China has long been a serious threat to world security, but desperately wants to be seen as a principal power in the world. (who knows, perhaps they are even pulling strings in N. Korea to make China look like the good guys that can keep things in check on the peninsula).

      So, guided missile exercises in the Sea of Japan or in the Taiwanese straights are seen as a little provocative, but what about a little cyber warfare. Or would that be Warefare :-). If this is the case, it would be unprecedented.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Trojan, or propaganda? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      my hoockie-meter raised quite a bit too, this Aug has been reported as the worst for viri and worms in history. As for as not using chinese programmers or programs, I though that software piracy was so rampant in china that effectively all the chinaese use bootleged windows; which probbly makes them a little leary about getting the latest patches from those foriegn devils in Redmond WA USA. Anybody who puts all of their computers on one OS is asking for trouble

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  3. Propoganda and FUD by globalar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I did not make it to the article, so I am basing this comment upon the posted text.

    "China has launched a systematic information warfare campaign against Taiwan"

    That would be propoganda. Hackers, or more technically, computers, in China have launched an attack. Not the Chinese government, not the nation of China, a group of individuals using computers in China.

    "'National intelligence has indicated that an army of hackers based...'"

    Again, a little over the top with the "army of hackers" reference. This makes it seem like the hackers have some official link or even political cause.

    "'If there's any lesson from this experience, it is not to use software developed in China or hire Chinese computer programmers,'"

    Propoganda. Incredibly, this sort of logic would mean that living or working within a country means that you are a malicious agent of that country. Ludicrous.

    Oh, and please do observe the editor who approved this article.

  4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Or the constant port scanning.

  5. Reporting live from northern Taiwan. . . by ahfoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, this is the first I've learned of it. My ultra cheap standard issue 1.5Mbps DSL connection seems to be going just fine. Got a few connections to the WayBack machine going and I just finished the rounds at a dozen web sites, EETimes, DisplaySearch, BioTech East, Digitimes, Google News and on and on. None of them had any problems, nice snappy connections. A few of those are in Taiwan so locally and internationally the network itself seems fine.
    The only thing I couldn't get to was the feakin' story at the notoriously paranoid Taipei Times because apparently the greater threat to the local net than the mainland is slashdotting!

  6. Where's the proof? by FooBarWidget · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How do they know "China" (as in the Chinese government) is attacking Taipei, instead of just a group of people? I mean, if Joe Hacker from the USA attacks the Belgium government servers do you call it an attack by Joe Hacker or an attack by the USA?

  7. Army of hackers? by magoolsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    s/army of hackers/script kiddy in US with a bunch of hax0r3d puters from china/

    I think that would be more accurate.

  8. Regardless of the implications... by tambo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Regardless of the implications of this:

    1) This is, to put it concisely, goddamn cool. We've been hearing for years about how countries might wage some kind of hax0r-cyber-warfare on each other, but aside from a few isolated instances (e.g., the U.S. disabling Iraqi computers in 1992 by introducing a hardcore virus via, of all things, printer driver software), we've dismissed it as futurist hogwash. But it may be happening now. If so, it's an historic moment in computer science.

    2) This is better for people than having any country invade or bomb another. This type of invasion may be a precursor to that one - but if, in the future, a country can be brought to its knees with minimal loss of life by just wrecking its computer infrastructure, then that is a good development of history.

    - David Stein

    --
    Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  9. Doesn't sound right by lprechan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The two main Taiwanese routers are presently showing a 192ms and a 203 ms response time with a 0% packet loss. China, OTOH, has four main routers with two of them showing a 0ms response time coupled with a 100% packet loss.

    Smells a bit like propaganda to me...

  10. Propaganda? by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These kinds of "attacks" have become commonplace. They happened after the election of the new Taiwanese president as well.

    It's widely believed that these hackers do in fact have an official link with the Chinese government as part of the People's Liberation Army in their efforts to prepare for what they term "asymetrical warfare."

    This would involve using systematic computer attacks to take down the Taiwanese technological infrastructure and communications in the moments before or following a massive short-range missile attack across the Taiwan Strait.

    The goal would be to spur massive confusion and allow the substandard Chinese naval and amphibious forces to seize the island before the United States could mobilize to its defense and making any attack by American forces that much more difficult.

    The Taiwanese position isn't "propaganda." It's information based on what they know is happening in China. And yes, China does have a goal of reunifying the island with the mainland and refuses to rule out the use of military force or any other method necessary.

    Do you think the hackers just happened to attack Taiwan because they were in the neighborhood?

  11. ....But Taiwanese Support China by reporter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    However, the Taiwanese actually support mainland China to the tune of $50 billion of investment. The Taiwanese, via the Taiwanese constitution, also insist that Tibet is part of China. The majority of spies arrested in the USA for stealing sensitive technology to give to Beijing were born or grew up in Taiwan. Please read "Understanding Taiwan: Security Threat to USA".

  12. Re:Before you forecast the Chinese invasion... by tehanu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally a lot of the Chinese I know think of the Taiwanese as people who can't speak proper Mandarin...They also believe that Taiwan should be part of China again. I'm not sure how much this can really be blamed on government brainwashing though. Chinese (well Han Chinese anyway) have always believed very strongly in the concept of China as one people and one culture. Periods of time when there have been two or more "Chinas" have always resulted in much effort expended in reuniting the country. There is no celebration of disunity or having independent Chinese "countries". One wonders how the Taiwanese actually reconcile this cultural history with their desire to remain separate from China. In the Chinese mode of thinking, the desire to NOT be Chinese, is very strange.

    In Chinese folklore, literature and popular history all divisions in China (a very popular topic), whether through civil war or barbarian invasion always end up with the country reunited by some glorious hero (or occassionally talented despot who is then deposed by a glorious hero). Having Chinese accept two Chinas is like asking Westerners to accept that yes, the villain really should win the war and beat the good guys. In the books, China always gets reunited by the good guys and everyone rejoices and lives happily ever after.

  13. Mr. Peanut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Carter had education & training as an engineer (including nuclear) which is why he was able to go to Three Mile Island and not put in just a token appearance. This was a bit of a shock to the idiots who wanted to talk down to him.

    Carter was absolutely, undeniably, one of the worst presidents this country has ever seen. He attempted to micromanage the entire US Government single-handedly. Track down pictures of him before and after he was in office. He aged about thirty years during that time. When he left office, inflation was 14%; mortgage rates were 22%. Compare that to the previous ten years (now): 2%-3% inflation and 5%-8% (max) mortgage rates.

    That said (I'm sure pro-Carter folks have stopped reading because they've made their minds made up by now as to what I'm saying (or not)), Carter has been probably our best ex-president this country has ever seen and will will ever see, bar none. It's unfortunate he didn't handle his time in office better so it makes it difficult to weigh whether what he's done since leaving outweighs what he did in office.

    For those who weren't around then:

    "On today's menu: A Jimmy Carter sandwich (Peanut Butter and balonga sandwich)"

    Popular Slogan: "Fritz and Gritz"

    And last, but not least, his brother Billy, who had a brand of beer named after him (Billy Beer) and had the practice of unzipping and relieving himself in some of the most unusual places (e.g., the side of an airport building, in plain view to anyone who wanted to watch).

    1. Re:Mr. Peanut by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the Nobel Prize folks said that the prize was given to Carter as a "kick in the leg" to President Bush... I'm not sure I'd want a prize delivered partially as a "protest vote" against somebody else.

      Don't misunderstand me... Carter has done some very good, altruistic, humanitarian things, primarily with building housing for the very poor. Carter, however, is NOT president any more, and really needs to keep his opinions to himself when it comes to the things that subsequent presidents have done.

      It's always been customary that when you leave the presidency, and no longer have access to the briefings, information, and intel that the current president has, you go build your library, do some sort of philanthropy, give the current president some breathing room to do the job as HE sees fit, and STFU. Apart from the rare public statement, Reagan understood it, Bush I understood it, even Clinton mostly understood it... everyone gets it but Carter.

      I like what he's done for others (I remember his presidency, and others have already commented on it, so I won't), but he really needs to get off the world stage and get on with being a private citizen.

      If I see one more news clip with Carter injecting himself into some international crisis, editorializing and publicly second-guessing everyone and everything that's been done, I'll vomit.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  14. An even scarier scenario... by vudufixit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is that these attacks are being committed by provocateurs who are purposely trying to cause a war between the two.

  15. Re:Bigger picture by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Taiwan is a democracy. China is not. We have a defence treaty w/ Taiwan. We'd be very obligated to get involved.

    I'm sure China would then say, "Psst! North Korea! It's ok, if you attack South Korea right now, we'll back you up!"

    Still sound nice to hear about?

    --
    [o]_O
  16. Windoew Source Code by grendel's+mom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's really interesting is that Microsoft allowed China access to the source code from Windows. Could the Chinese have used this information to aid in attacking Taiwan?

  17. Hive Mind by SunPin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sino culture is different. There are no individuals in China. Nobody thinks of themselves as individuals and this hive mind mentality makes propaganda spread easily. Those that think of themselves as individuals tend to be visiting Western professors under state surveillance or Chinese citizens in prison.

    Americans have their behavior rooted in a mythology of distant settlers fucking over a detached empire. If you want to call that mythology overrated, maybe you have a case. If you want to call that mythology false, just try to push the citizen next to you and hope he doesn't have a gun.

    Any individuality that China had either ran like Hell or was ruthlessly slaughtered during Mao's Cultural Revolution.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  18. Reality of Taiwan: Mercenaries by reporter · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The reality is that the Taiwanese are more mercenary-like than the Americans. Please read "Reality of Taiwan".

    Remember the incident at Tienanmen Square in 1989. After it happened, the Americans and other Westerners froze or curtailed investments into mainland China. Even the Japanese followed suit, and for the first time after 1945, the Japanese condemned China. Western nations like Japan and the USA immediately slapped economic sanctions against China.

    What did the Chinese in Taiwan and Hong Kong do? The Taiwanese immediately seized this window of opportunity and accelerated financial and technological investments into China. The Taiwanese provided any money or technology that the Westerners refused to provide . Since 1989, Taiwanese investment into mainland China has grown at double-digit rates. As of 2003, the Taiwanese have invested more than $50 billion into more than 50,000 businesses into mainland China.

    Furthermore, the Taiwanese request and receive preferential treatment when they invest in China. By contrast, American companies do not receive preferential treatment. The Chinese government occasionally punishes American companies because the American government sells weapons to Taiwan. While the Taiwanese demand that Americans sell them weapons, the Taiwanese insist that Tibet is part of China: the Taiwanese constitution says that Tibet is part of China.

    The time has come to stop this nonsense. The Americans should cancel the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and stop selling weapons to Taiwan. The Taiwanese have exploited American generosity and naiveness. Americans should not allow Taiwanese hypocrisy to hurt American business opportunities in China.

    ... from the desk of the reporter