Slashdot Mirror


Dutch Court Rules That Linking Is Legal In Scientology Case

touretzky writes "The Court of Appeal in The Hague today rejected all of Scientology's claims in appeal in Scientology's action against XS4ALL, Karin Spaink and ten other internet providers. As a result, Karin Spaink's website, which Scientology sought to remove from the Internet based on copyright claims, is entirely legal in the Netherlands. The court also overturned two lower court rulings, one of which said that linking to material that infringed a copyright was itself actionable. The other ruling said that ISPs that failed to act on credible notification of a copyright violation could be held liable for that. The Appeals Court felt that this was too vague a standard, and thus posed a threat to free speech. More info at ScientologyWatch.org."

2 of 386 comments (clear)

  1. Re:"Confidential" nature of religious documents? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've noticed lately that religious intolerance has made a real comeback, especially among Leftists. What happened to disagreement with tolerance?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  2. Re:A bad decision by Sphere1952 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It might be copyright infrigement, but I have every moral right to do it anyway. If I post the entire album I am engaging in non-commercial free speech -- even if my objective is to bring ruination to a commercial entity.

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.