Bacteria Powered Batteries
Agent Provocateur writes "SpaceDaily reports on
a battery that is powered by chemical reactions caused by bacteria.
A Pentagon-backed project, University of Massachusetts researchers Swades Chaudhuri, an Indian, and Derek Lovley, an American, say the battery's source is an underground bacterium that gobbles up sugar and converts its energy into electricity.
Their prototype device ran flawlessly without refuelling for up to 25 days and is cheap and stable." The chemistry behind this thing isn't really that complex - keeping the bacteria alive and kicking during that time is prolly the tougher part - you can read more on Al Jazeera, and USA Today. Now, what about replacing this battery?
The reason Santa is so jolly is that he knows where all the bad girls live.
"It has to be able to use raw materials, rather than giving it refined fuel."
Huh? I for one would happily buy one if it could run my 40W max laptop for 8 hours on an ounce and a half (about 50 grams) of refined sugar. Why does it need further refinement before use?
From the article:
This I want to power my car. And laptop. And house appliances (not just so that I can pour coffee on my computer to recharge the battery)
This solves the hydrogen-storing problem in the hydrogen powered vehicles: no more dangerous concentration of hydrogen, instead you get a small tank containing bubbling "mud". Not quite inflammable in case of a collision.
Add to this that it's hardly polluting (just as much as taking a dump in a bosquet, I'd say), and it even helps reducing the amount of houseold garbage (Powerplants recycling garbage, anyone ?).
The main aspect of this energy source is that it completely suppress the need for combustion. Instead it uses slow, catalyzed, controlled chemical processes that use a lower amount of initial energy. No more smoke.
Maybe I'm overstating all this, but it definitely looks cool. And it's cheap, too. Carrot-powered car, coming our way !
What I need is a back yard composter/fertilizer dispenser/generator that I can throw leaves, grass (actually I mulch these now), kitched scaps (sugar cubes, carrots, etc).
I sell the extra energy back to the power grid, and spread the fertilizer on my yard.
No wait, this would make to much ecological/economic sense, I must be some kind of hippie, tree hugger, freak.
Any Marines out there able to give a few better specifics?
Kinda off topic, but hey, it's still funny.
Xaotik Designs
This sounds like a neat power source for nano-technology. Power the nanobots off the sugar in the bloodstream.
And some get entered just to remove sugar from the bloodstreams of diabetics. Where do I sign up for that? (I'm a type II diabetic already, this could stave off more drastic treatment for years.)
Al Jazeera is a TV channel which particularity is to mostly be broadcasted in the Gulf countries.
As you may now, before terrorists, these countries
host oil producers.
Because of the great fear of losing control when all of the oil will have been drilled, it sounds obvious that these billionaires are interested in investing in alternative power sources such as this one, so that they are certain they'll keep control of worldwide energy sales...
Terrorism is just an artefact that has been added after "some" occidental countries decided to interefere with the local governments...
Trolling using another account since 2005.
83% Efficient? Thats impressive, if true. If you think that a typical car engine is only 20% efficient. Maybe one day you could run your car on Glucose..
"You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
I wonder how safe these bacteria are? Not in any fearful way, but could they
be used to power an artificial heart, getting the sugar from the body? Perhaps
power artificial limbs?
SealBeater
-- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
It doesn't state how much sugar it needs, nor the cost for electricity based on sugar prices. Any chemist know how 83% efficiency translates into cost and amount of sugar needed for a certain amount of power consumption?
Question everything.
Interesting story. Given that the power is generated by bacteria, my first question would have to be: Is an optimal temperature required for bacterial function / electrical generation?
Maintaining a warm environment for the sake of the bacteria would certainly rule out plenty of uses from cars to flashlights, and most importantly: that little light that goes on when you open your freezer.
------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
Excellent point. Notice that the Al Jazeera version mentioned the nationalities, but the USA Today version didn't.
I wonder whether Swades Chaudhuri is an American born in India (or of Indian descent), or an Indian citizen? It isn't relevant to the research, but it could reveal Al Jazeera's spin.
Also notice how Al Jazeera said that was a "Pentagon-backed" project at the top of the article, while USA Today said it was DOD funded way down at the bottom.
But it's extremely unfortunate and in poor taste that Slashdot choose to highlight it using Al Jazeera as a news source. This news outlet is the largest voice of anti-US sentiment in the Arab world and is a particularly offensive forum to highight while our soldiers are still dying in that area of the world.
Uhm... it's unfortunate yes. But ONLY because Al-Jazeera is such an unreliable source of accurate news.
no thanks
In most countries outside the Western hemisphere, there are still few immigrants from non-neighboring countries (unless of course they come from the colonizing countries). So the idea of nationality is still very strong and significant. Al Jazeera would have mentioned the nationalities even if the researchers were Chinese and French.
Also, outside North America the Pentagon is the symbol of American military and people use "Pentagon" and "American army" interchangeably, most of them haven't even heard of "DOD." You say potehto I say potahto...
Basically, the contrasts you see are simply due to differences in cultures. Peace.