Slashdot Mirror
Why VoIP Makes Telecom Regulations Irrelevant
An anonymous reader writes "BusinessWeek Online analyzes why state and federal regulators' attempts to label VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) a "telecommunications service" is wrong - and threatens to undermine the technology. It quotes Vint Cerf as saying: 'To single out VoIP as a telephone service is a terrible misunderstanding of the Internet industry. I would submit that, someday, the phrase Internet telephony will sound as archaic as 'horseless carriage' sounds today.'" We've also recently discussed Vonage's attempts to fight telecom regulation in Minnesota.
Do you want reliable telephone service? Even if there is a power failure?
During the northeast blackout a month ago, my landline phone went dead also. Meanwhile, if Roadrunner had backup juice on their network, my broadband would not go out even in the event of a blackout (my home server, firewall, Tivo and Vonage ATA can live for 4 hours off the grid).
Do you want guaranteed availability of telephone service at uniform and reasonable rates, even if you live on a farm or in a slum?
Where there is broadband Internet, there can be VoIP. As last-mile broadband gets more economical via wireless and optical (along with traditional copper and cable), so will VoIP.
Do you want 911 service that works?
I can dial 911 from my Vonage home telephone just fine, thank you very much.
If Vonage starts overcharging, I will be happy to switch to another VoIP service, such as packet8.