Slashdot Mirror


Workplace Privacy - IBM Hot, Lilly Not

Brahmastra writes "Reuters has posted an article about the best and worst companies for workplace privacy, passing on information from the forthcoming issue of Wired Magazine, and IBM comes out on top. How does your workplace compare?" According to the summary, Eli Lilly was rated "the most notorious Big Brother boss", after "...its invasive background checks of workers after Sept. 11, 2001, some of which led to dismissals."

25 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Just fine by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny
    How does your workplace compare?

    My employer is pretty good when it comes to workplace privacy and freedom. Afterall, they don't seem to mind me reading Slas

  2. No privacy at work by Hayzeus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Still can't masturbate in the privacy of my cube without someone complaining to HR. The terrorists have already won...

    1. Re:No privacy at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm happy to report that there is still privacy at home which may facilitate your requirements...

  3. IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    and IBM is Big Blue Brother :)

  4. IBM by devphaeton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course IBM comes out on top, as far as privacy goes. I've never worked there, but all the stories i hear about IBM gives me the impression that they are stuffy, overly structured, and overprofessional... Kinda like the IRS or the CIA.

    Especially thier legal department. You just don't fuck with IBM....

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  5. Re:IBM? by questamor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Must have been when Apple snuck up on us and became all geek cool. I think I missed that announcement and suddenly it's all powerbooks and ibooks around me.

    Where's mine dammit?

  6. Man by Sevn · · Score: 0, Funny

    Those Eli Lilly people sound like TERRORISTS!!!!! We should probably lock them up for a few months with no trial or phonecalls then threaten them with evil shit until they admit they are!

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  7. Re:Here's the text for non-members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    its 2001 attempt to fight workers' compensation claims with genital testing.

    I've been afraid of this. The proliferation of penis enlargement spam, and thus penis enlargement "natural herbal methods" has given companies an excuse not to pay up on health insurance claims. If you measure 3" longer than you should (to say nothing of breadth and vigor), you've obviously been popping the pills, and since the side effects are unknown, your claim is nullified. It's the new urine test, only you don't even need a glass of water.

    Either that or the parent poster is less Informative than the moderators suspect.

  8. Lilly by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think the explanation behind Eli Lilly's bad track recor is that they deal with a lot of research data and patient information from their testing of drugs.

    While it's esay for us to sit here and complain on them for invasive background checks of workers after Sept. 11 its not that easy for them to avoid getting decent workers that don't disclose their research to terrorists. For example if Bin-Laden got hold of all the research of Elly he might avoid getting diseases like osteoporosis, cancer, depression, schizophrenia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. So actually its better that they check their future employees than Bin-Laden getting 120 yeras old.

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
  9. Re:IBM? by TCM · · Score: 5, Funny

    When did they get all nice-nice?

    They didn't. Everyone else got bad-bad.

    --
    Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  10. Re:IBM Privacy.... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new rulers from IBM....

  11. Re:Go Big Blue! by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 2, Funny

    They don't spy on employees...they are helping the Linux battle against SCO, not to mention helping further open source by contributing to Linux, eclipse, and others.

    It all adds up: while they're not watching what their employees are doing, their employees are contributing things to Linux that are getting them sued by SCO.

    Er... is what SCO might say...

    --

    The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
  12. Re:I expect no privacy at work. by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let me guess...you are posting on Slashdot from work???

    Well, let's see. I know on Slashdot we don't read articles, but do we at least read comments we are replying to?

    With all that said... I did post this from work. ;)

    Ladies and gentlemen, we have our answer!

  13. Re:IBM? by orkysoft · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't be so hard on the poor AC. He actually has an account, but he's unable to log in because he can't spell his password right!

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  14. Heh. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of an old job, when one of the bosses tried to install a key-logger on my machine. It stored the key presses as a text file in C:\. Of course I noticed this (hard not to, it kept crashing) -- and being the evil person that I am, I replaced it with some imaginative ASCI art.

    I don't work there anymore.

  15. angry by KReilly · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would post a very angry reply, but I am posting this from work.

  16. Mine's great by PD · · Score: 3, Funny

    They kindly leave the firewall configured so I can SSH to my home machine and tunnel to my private proxy. Thanks boss!

  17. Privacy is so good.... by zapp · · Score: 3, Funny

    because all their employees work in Singapore, India, Russia, etc.

    Pretty hard to walk buy and catch someone watchin porn when they're halfway around the world!

    --
    no comment
  18. Re:opt out by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2, Funny
    Does that imply I can opt out of the laws I don't like?

    My vote is for the Law of Gravity. No! Wait...Conservation of Energy... mmmmmmm perpetual motion...No Wait! Inertia! Yea!

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  19. With his skin cancer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...he's probably glad he did.... great discounts for ex-employees. AND monitoring. Lilly cares.

  20. Re:The Radical Right Took Your Privacy Circa 1982 by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even the worst libertarian excesses of the 1980s War on Drugs, as presided over by Edwin Meese...

    You might want to pick up a dictionary and look at the word "libertarian".

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  21. Somewhere, The PR Guys Are Smiling by reallocate · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now you know what PR people get paid for....

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  22. Re:IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    you said... "hard on"

  23. Re:The Radical Right Took Your Privacy Circa 1982 by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, I would hardly call even President Bush "a member of the radical right wing". I think this term is usually reserved for the folks who let religious beliefs be their primary guide in their political views - and who believe in individual freedoms and rights only "as long as it doesn't interfere with my own moral beliefs".

    The "War on Drugs" certainly did cost us civil liberties - but honestly, this was an unfortunate side-effect of President Reagan allowing his wife to get her way on the issue, more than anything else. It may well be the biggest mistake Reagan made during his term of office, too.

    I don't see the fight to stop our individual rights and freedoms from slipping away as something that follows along any particular party lines. It's an issue that affects *everyone*, conservative or liberal. No matter who is in office, I'd hope they have some respect for these things, because we hardly have a "United States of America" worth mentioning without them.

  24. Re:Lilly by Ezubaric · · Score: 2, Funny

    And no, I'm not a 24-year-old script kiddie (I'm 41).

    And we know there is a surging market for 41-year-old script geezers.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.