Slashdot Mirror


Workplace Privacy - IBM Hot, Lilly Not

Brahmastra writes "Reuters has posted an article about the best and worst companies for workplace privacy, passing on information from the forthcoming issue of Wired Magazine, and IBM comes out on top. How does your workplace compare?" According to the summary, Eli Lilly was rated "the most notorious Big Brother boss", after "...its invasive background checks of workers after Sept. 11, 2001, some of which led to dismissals."

10 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Just fine by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny
    How does your workplace compare?

    My employer is pretty good when it comes to workplace privacy and freedom. Afterall, they don't seem to mind me reading Slas

  2. No privacy at work by Hayzeus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Still can't masturbate in the privacy of my cube without someone complaining to HR. The terrorists have already won...

  3. Re:Here's the text for non-members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    its 2001 attempt to fight workers' compensation claims with genital testing.

    I've been afraid of this. The proliferation of penis enlargement spam, and thus penis enlargement "natural herbal methods" has given companies an excuse not to pay up on health insurance claims. If you measure 3" longer than you should (to say nothing of breadth and vigor), you've obviously been popping the pills, and since the side effects are unknown, your claim is nullified. It's the new urine test, only you don't even need a glass of water.

    Either that or the parent poster is less Informative than the moderators suspect.

  4. Lilly by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think the explanation behind Eli Lilly's bad track recor is that they deal with a lot of research data and patient information from their testing of drugs.

    While it's esay for us to sit here and complain on them for invasive background checks of workers after Sept. 11 its not that easy for them to avoid getting decent workers that don't disclose their research to terrorists. For example if Bin-Laden got hold of all the research of Elly he might avoid getting diseases like osteoporosis, cancer, depression, schizophrenia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. So actually its better that they check their future employees than Bin-Laden getting 120 yeras old.

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
  5. Re:IBM? by TCM · · Score: 5, Funny

    When did they get all nice-nice?

    They didn't. Everyone else got bad-bad.

    --
    Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  6. Re:IBM? by orkysoft · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't be so hard on the poor AC. He actually has an account, but he's unable to log in because he can't spell his password right!

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  7. Heh. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of an old job, when one of the bosses tried to install a key-logger on my machine. It stored the key presses as a text file in C:\. Of course I noticed this (hard not to, it kept crashing) -- and being the evil person that I am, I replaced it with some imaginative ASCI art.

    I don't work there anymore.

  8. Mine's great by PD · · Score: 3, Funny

    They kindly leave the firewall configured so I can SSH to my home machine and tunnel to my private proxy. Thanks boss!

  9. Privacy is so good.... by zapp · · Score: 3, Funny

    because all their employees work in Singapore, India, Russia, etc.

    Pretty hard to walk buy and catch someone watchin porn when they're halfway around the world!

    --
    no comment
  10. Re:The Radical Right Took Your Privacy Circa 1982 by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even the worst libertarian excesses of the 1980s War on Drugs, as presided over by Edwin Meese...

    You might want to pick up a dictionary and look at the word "libertarian".

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!