Slashdot Mirror


Co-founder Joy to leave Sun

TheLinuxWarrior writes "An article at CNET says Bill Joy, Sun Micro co-founder and chief scientist, is leaving the company." You'd think after two decades of working at Sun, they could've found a better picture!

3 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. and vi by tigersha · · Score: 5, Informative

    And he was responsible for vi. For this I cannot decide whether he should be praised as a computer great or be disgraced as the author of the greatest horrible-excuse-for-an-editor known to man.

    http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~kirkenda/joy84.html

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  2. The article is slightly incorrect by watzinaneihm · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article says sun was co-founded by Scott mcneally an Bill Joy. Actually there were 4 of them out of which 2 have already quit. So with the third guy on the way out it leaves only Scott behind.
    Bill Joy can easily take a lot of credit for Java though

    --
    .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
  3. Re:Why would anyone choose sun? by pmz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I priced a Sun PCI SCSI card last week. $500. No RAID, no cache, just a vanila SCSI card with a Sun sticker (and solaris support). Thats just insane.

    One thing you do get is peace of mind in an environment where time == money. It is very likely that Sun-branded card was integration tested with their machines and Solaris, so the odds are very very good that it will serve you well. Contrast this with the PC world, where the odds are simply good. The difference is not trivial, IMO.

    If I had a business, where revenue was good enough that I didn't have to survive on peanut butter and scrapped-together computers, I would seriously consider Sun equipment. It can be refreshing to simply plug in a card, do a boot -r, and have it ready to go. Along with SunSolve and docs.sun.com, Sun doesn't often leave people wanting for documentation, either. It seems they generally treat their customers pretty well. With PC companies, things are less predictable, and a big brand name doesn't really imply any amount of quality (often they are worse than the white-box suppliers).