2.4GHz Wireless Video from Model Rocket
ExidyBoy writes "While the Gates Brothers fly entire camcorders in their rockets to record onboard footage, a cheaper alternative is to use off-the-shelf 2.4GHz wireless video senders. The Aussie RocketCam site has Windows Media and QuickTime clips of the spectacular results that can be obtained."
The Classic Guide by the "Father of Model Rocketry" Now Completely Revised and up to Date... This new edition of the model rocketeer's "bible" shows you how to safely build, launch, track, and recover model rockets--and have fun doing it. Whether you're a beginner or a veteran model rocketeer, the Handbook of Model Rocketry, the official manual of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), will become your well-used reference book. G. Harry Stine has been a model rocketeer since 1957 when he founded the NAR and started the first model rocket company. Stine's Handbook, after satisfying rocket enthusiasts for nearly three decades, remains the definitive resource. Recent technological progress has had a major effect on the model rocket hobby and sport. This revised and updated edition covers such new technology as:
- revised computer programs that use improved versions of Basic composite propellant model rocket motors
- recently approved reloadable model rocket motors building and flying large model rockets
- solid-state, microchip, computer-readable modules used to measure temperature, pressure, acceleration, and airspeed
Quoted from: Amazonradio-controlled boost gliders and rocket gliders
--
Your Friendly Neighborhood Product Placement Troll
Is that even with WEP, someone can sniff your traffic and see your rocket footage.
While this is kinda cool, it is nothing new. Putting a cam in a rocket is the next best thing to being in the rocket itself.
The thing that I would like to see is for them to have some degree of control over the rocket. Unfortunately (here in the US), and RC rocket is classified as a "missile" and is a big no-no.
It's also good to see this hobby being kept alive,
But I still think that the project for that Linux powered balloon is better: http://vpizza.org/~jmeehan/balloon/ Though there is no motion picture, the still images taken from over 80,000 ft up are very impressive.
... with my cheap X-10 camera, but batteries, rather than the camera, seemed to be the problem. It wouldn't have been terribly hard to launch them, it just would have been difficult to recover the rocket intact with all of that weight.
A radio controlled car ended up being a much better, and more fun choice. It's probably good that this technology didn't exist at a feasible price point for me when I was in junior high school, for I'd likely have gotten into a lot of trouble...
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
Okay. I'll admit it. I'm the one who attached the wireless camera to the cat.
But it didn't do any harm! Ran around. Chased something. Probably the antenna. The cat was perfectly fine!
Well.
Until I affixed the cat to a model rocket. But wow! That cat went higher than Armadillo Aerospace using a rocket jump.
It's not like any of us are going to be able to see these videos. Maybe slashdot should have an option to block stories that link to useless multimedia (until Taco extracts his head from his rear and sets up a /. bittorrent server.)
How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
a cheaper alternative is to use off-the-shelf 2.4GHz wireless video senders.
And, to save money on the receiver side, just use off-the-shelf wireless video getters.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
one of these when I was about 13.
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
In an experimental attempt to turn the Slashdot effect back on itself using BitTorrent, and exploit my subscriber access, I hereby offer a zip file of the website itself and all of the movies (three of them) I could get off the site before it was slashdotted into oblivion.
here's the 11.5 meg wmv format video, 25% slowmo
t .n et/serpentine5_slo_long.wmv
http://comcastchargesmetoomuchmoney.home.comcas
/()*!)(*%)(!/*%) NO CARRIER
BOOM!
(random crap so the lameness filter shuts up)
I launched a tethered balloon with a 450Mhz transmitter to transmit video. The 450Mhz stuff is better in some ways, it's less directional, and you can receive it on a regular VCR or TV card tuner.
Some Pictures
I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
Why Quicktime or WMV?
What's wrong with MPEG 1, 2 or 4???
Hell, have we all embraced Microsoft and Apple now?
Today at work (I work in a university's Instructional tech dept) I got to play with what is sold as "the worlds smallest wireless camera".
And well, it was really small. About the size of my thumb plus a 9 volt battery. The stock range sucked though. I put on a 5ft Extension on the antenna (the antenna attached to the base via a coax adapter, so I just used a coax cable), and that about doubled the range.
We were able to use it 1 floor up and about 100 feet away. This was around the tech dept though, so tons and tons of live electrical and data wiring.
Anyways, what I am asking is, has anyone considered using something like this?
I have a wireless card in my computer, and I start getting a bad connection about 150ft from the base station.
The X10 hardware turns out to be pretty rugged, as I found out when the carrier rocket took a 200' death plunge into a nearby field. All of the wire leads broke, but they resolder easily, and the short bit of harder to fix coax was fine.
Luke, help me take this mask off
Sorry to disappoint, but I don't believe they do that in flight.
[Disclaimer: IANAO (I am not an ornithologist)]
2.4 Ghz transmitter and receiver: $100
Bullet Camera: $75
Hosting at netspace.net.au: $44.95 / month up to 100 MB
Having your 15MB mpegs slashdotted: Priceless
Literally.
I want the fire back.