Slashdot Mirror
Beatles Bite Apple
blamanj writes "Apple Computer, which once got into hot water with the Beatles Apple record label, has been sued once again by the same group. Apple Records says iTunes and the iPod violate the previous agreement." Apple's broke their agreement in the past when speakers were first used with their computers to play music.
Frankly, I think it's ridiculous, and Apple music knows it, but probably figures they can milk them for a little more cash, so why not?
FYI- IIRC, this was the origin of the "sosumi" sound (one of the first sounds apples made) (so-sue-me)
(You know, he owns the rights to the Beatles songs)
Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!
Uh, Wait just a minute... How can the Beatles be suing Apple if they are giving away an iPod with each Beatle sold? ;-)
I think we can now safely transfer the "Apple Is Dying" meme from Apple Computer to Apple Records.
I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
This is obviously just an attempt by Apple Corps to be bought out. ;-)
Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
It actually is kind of confusing:
Apple:Beetles::Apple:Beatles
Turns out that cute girl's A|X t-shirt didn't mean AIX. Who would've thought?!
I don't know about anyone else, but, I can see Apple Music's point....I mean, when I look for music, I'm geniunly confused about between which company is the music rights holder for the beatles, and which one has a library of a couple hundred thousand songs for $0.99/piece that also owns one of the three major platforms of personal computers!! I mean, how confusing can it get?!?!?!
Now that Apple computers make music there is confusion between the Apple label and Apple computers.
Things are going to get a lot worse when we start hooking up Macs to food replicators and order lunch by saying:
"Computer, a Big Mac, Fries and a Coke..."
There will also be trademark confusion when trucking companies start using autopilots for their long haul routes. You'll see Macs driving Mack Trucks.
Brand confusion will get ugly I tell ya.
A desperate move to alienate fans?
So that's how money is made in the music business. :-)
philcrissman.com.
Stop talking trash about Glenn Miller or I'll run a String of Pearls through your nose. Now Take the A Train outta here or I'll sing you a Moonlight Serenade, and you don't want that.
http://www.rootstrikers.org/
Koo, koo ka-sue?
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
...A talking apple is suing Apple Computers for using the name Macintosh. As its primary defense, Apple Computers pointed out that the apple in question was actually a fiji, and had no such ownership of the trademark. The Apple lawyers had a hard time proving their case, however, as the apple's main defense was to turn into an inanimate object every time a question was asked...
TPF
it's not the fact that they were the first "boy band" that makes the historically significant. modern boy bands don't write their own music or lyrics, nor to the majority of modern pop artists. the beatles wrote all their own lyrics and music. they created a completely different sound than what ever existed before (you can't listen to just the early or just the late beatles to hear this sound either). their creative skills were much larger than any modern rock band. they use completely different methods in arranging their music. they are the single most influential band to ever exist in music. most of what you, your parent poster, his parent poster, and even the guy that made the first "beatles suck" comment listen to was influenced by something the beatles did. i'm not saying you have to enjoy their music, but you have to respect that they basically created modern rock/pop music. the only person who might be more influential is bob dylan, and that's only as far as lyrics are concerned since he showed the beatles how to write songs about real things, not just teenage love/lust. you might even throw brian wilson and the beach boys in there too. without the rivalry, the bealtes wouldn't have gotten to where they did, and paul claims brian wilson as one of his major influences and pet sounds as one of his favorite albums.
so the moral of the story is... although you may not like the music of the beatles, it exists in probably everythign you listen to (unless you listen to classical or jazz or variants of those).
please me, have no regrets.
Maybe Apple Computer should sue Apple Corp. for copying the look and feel of their lawsuits.
A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
I recall one of the first Mac beep sounds was entitled "Sosumi" (So-Sue-Me) because technically they were violating that agreement
You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
What's an intensive purpose? ;)
;)
fap...fap...fap...fap
http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
It really has nothing to do with any of the Beatles songs, but the rights to the name "Apple", which is now own3d by EMI.
But what will come out of this?
-EMI losing, since the record company Apple essentially doesn't exist (is declared partially rotten and is discarded)
-HugeCashSettlement (let's give more money to the large record companies!)
-Apple starts a subsidiary (Banana or Pineapple) and transfers all music-related things there
-Name is changed to The Computer Company Formerly Known As Apple (TCCFKAS)
-Apple uses the Chewbacca defense
There are 010 kinds of people. Those who understand octal, those who don't, and 06 other kinds of morons.