Scientists Set New Coldest Temperature Record
one_who_uses_unix writes "Scientists recently successfully cooled a gas to the coldest temperature ever recorded ABC News reports. This is good news for proponents of basic research (read non-applied) which has seen shrinking budgets over the past few decades, and for overclockers hoping to squeeze 1 more cycle out of their CPUs."
You might look at it in a similar vein to reaching the speed of light. As your mass increases exponentially the closer you get to the speed of light, you'd have used up all the energy in the universe to accelerate long before you "get there".
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
and for overclockers hoping to squeeze 1 more cycle out of their CPUs
How does such a low temperature help in overclocking ?
Article says:
"At less than 1 nanokelvin, the atoms screech to a crawl, moving only one inch every 30 seconds. "
Does anyone else also think that "overclocking" was mentioned just to get attention of
I would imagine his opinion would remain unchanged by this new record...
This is the coldest known place in the universe: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap030220.html
"To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking
The chances are that they'll never hit absolute zero
:)
You're more right than you know. According to current quantum mechanics (which has been tested inside and out), the Heizenberg uncertainty principle states that the more you know about the velocity of a partical, the less you can know about its position, etc. In other words, the uncertainties must multiply together to be greater than plank's constant divided by 2PI. As temperature approaches absolute zero, the uncertainty in momentum (which is a functional of thermal energy at that point, which is proportional to temperature) decreases. This causes the uncertainty in posiition to drastically increase.
Anyways at absolute zero this would mean the uncertainty in position would become infinite, in other words the position of the particle would be completely undefined. This is not possible so thus Absolute Zero is unattainable, even in theory.
Disclaimer: I'm still working on my degree, and I was in a hurry writing this. Please correct me if you can
logarithmic mapping
Good idea. Here is a logarithmic (base 10) scale:
Core of a supernova: 9.2
Highest man made (1996): 8.7
Core of the Sun: 7.2
Surface of the Sun: 3.75
Water boils: 2.57
Human body temperature: 2.49
Room temperature: 2.47
Water freezes: 2.44
Liquid oxygen: 1.95
Dark side of the moon: 1.95
Pluto: 1.68
Deepest depths of space: 0.44 (Cosmic microwave background)
Boomerang Nebula, coldest natural place in the universe: roughly zero
Coldest man made (1995): -6.77
Coldest man made (today): -9.3
Man made (-9.3) is as much colder than coldest place in the natural universe (zero) as the core of a supernova (9.2) is hotter than the coldest place in the natural universe.
-
- - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.