Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Borland Releases New C++ Toolkit

Posted by simoniker on from the c++-is-the-new-black dept.

shelleymonster writes "Infoworld points out that, after two years of coding, Borland has released its latest C++ development toolkit. Borland C++BuilderX is a multiplatform IDE for Windows, Linux, and Solaris that provides a brand-new visual development environment. Press release here." According to the Infoworld piece, "While newer languages, such as Java and Microsoft's C#, garner more attention than C++, research firm IDC projected that C and C++ professionals will remain the largest group of developers through 2005."

6 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. About Damn Time. by PakProtector · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been waiting for this for a long time. I'm still using Borland C++ Builder 5.0. I think. Whatever the latest patch was.

    I think it's time to break out the champange and do a happy-naked-pagan-dance 'round the stonehenge of mainframes in the back yard.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:About Damn Time. by IM6100 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're talking about this sybian, I assume.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  2. largest group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Research firm IDC projected that C and C++ professionals will remain the largest group of developers through 2005."

    That's highly subjective. What is a developer? Do you count sysadmins write shells scripts? (If so, they severely outnumber all other forms of development) Can you really lump in all C and C++ developers together (is someone using Visual C++.NET (i.e. using all the .NET libraries and pretty much ignoring the "standard" C++ libraries) the same as someone using gnu C++ on Solaris? What do you guys think?

  3. ha ha ha by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    research firm IDC projected that C and C++ professionals will remain the largest group of developers through 2005

    C vs. C++ is like vi vs. emacs. Saying that C and C++ professionals are one group is like suggesting a fusion between Megadeth and N'Sync.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. What about OS X? by alexhmit01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's weird. Most of the cross-platform toolkits assume that you will use VC++ on Windows, and don't support the Borland compiler very well, which is a shame. Trolltech also has a cross-platform environment (Qt), and they include OS X in there. I don't understand why Qt assumes VC++ on Windows, as opposed to Borland and/or GCC.

    I also don't understand making the effort to do Win32 and some sort of X11 interface, and not building an OS X one? Carbon is C based, and you should be able to build a Carbon wrapper.

    May not be a HUGE market, but the Mac market isn't THAT small., and it's MUCH bigger than Linux. Admittedly, there are probably about as many corporate Linux desktops as OS X desktops, but I know many Unix guys running OS X.

  5. Re:No Screenshots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Just take the "Product Tour"...

    Screenshots galore:

    href="http://www.borland.com/cbuilderx/tour/View_C ++BuilderX%20Turbo%20Demo.htm