Slashdot Mirror


Can You Raed Tihs?

An aoynmnuos raeedr sumbtis: "An interesting tidbit from Bisso's blog site: Scrambled words are legible as long as first and last letters are in place. Word of mouth has spread to other blogs, and articles as well. From the languagehat site: 'Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe. ceehiro.' Jamie Zawinski has also written a perl script to convert normal text into text where letters excluding the first and last are scrambled."

5 of 997 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hmmm by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I t___k y__r p__t is p___f t__t we d________y do n__d t_e m____e l_____s.





    Read: I think your post is proof that we definately do need the middle letters.

    --
    Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  2. Re:Yes, a cat's got my tongue, OK? by Bame+Flait · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, does this work well with letter pairs like, "th ch wh sh qu?" I forget what those are called.

    The reason it DOES work well with those letter pairs is that they aren't familiar at all in reverse. You're more likely to udnerstand their juxtaposition as what it's supposed to be, because you're used to it being one way.

    Where it DOESN'T work as well is when you begin breaking up complex phonemes or diphthongs in short words. Konw what I'm sayin'?

  3. Just english? and for all words? by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Can this assumptions be false for other kind of languages or a priori is universal? At least in spanish after a few tries looked to me less clear than in english.

    Also... what happen when the scrambled word is another valid word? Or a misspelled valid words?

  4. Re:Hmmm by Verteiron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bt we nd te ss fr te wd cs.

    But we need the spaces, at least, for the word cues.

    So how many "bits" of information can we strip from a sentence, on average, before we can no longer intuitively decipher it? The spaces give us information, but not as much as the letters themselves. Yet clearly the ordering of the letters contains much less information than the contents of a word's endpoints. This is odd stuff.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  5. Real world application by ThesQuid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I can think of one extremely interesting application for this idea - cryptography. It is actually highly intelligible, but definitely bound to give any code-breaking algorithims headaches when trying to correlate know words to patterns. I may have to try doing this to send messages to my friend in a chinese prison. I'm sure it would give the censors fits trying to translate it.