Slashdot Mirror


College Freshman Builds Fusion Reactor

Aiua writes "The Deseret Morning News is reporting that a Utah State University freshman has built a nuclear fusion reactor and compares how the student is similar to Philo T. Farnsworth (the inventor of the television and designer of the plans for a fusion reactor)."

8 of 680 comments (clear)

  1. Science and the science fair... by mooface · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was once an ISEF finalist/winner. "Second place" is a designation given to a substantial number of projects at the International fair. There are like 5-10 blue (first), 10-30 red (second), etc. The biggest winners are in a seperate catagory -- things like the, "BLAH T. BLAH SCIENCE AWARD" that includes a trip to Japan, or a trip to see the Nobel ceremonies, etc etc. Interestingly, building a project like this is really only a certain level of merit at a real science fair (like ISEF). I used to build devices like that -- and get awards like second place. The real thing the judges are looking for is scientific/research content. For instance, the kid may have built this and got it to work, but did he improve on the design? did he measure the efficiency of the system? did he use the device to study some effect X, Y, or Z? This may sound crazy, but at that level the high school students are expected to perform at the level of grad student researchers. The winning doesn't really matter, though -- the kid got a postiive experience that will stay with him for the rest of his life...!

  2. Re:Um.... by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you think this guy is brilliant, take a look at this guy's page. He built a CYCLOTRON(!!!) when he was in his senior year of HS! (he's now doing grad school work at Fermilab, what a shocker)

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  3. Re:Clever hoax? by Little+Brother · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I accept your bet, and all of slashdot is witness. I say "soon" would mean within six months, but I'll give you the benifit of the doubt and we'll say a year. That sound fair, if this not proven to be a hoax by that time, or if it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt NOT to be a hoax before that time I will email you an address to send the check, or you can pay via paypal. Likewise, if this turns out to be a hoax, email me (email address is listed correctly above, but make sure your SMTP server has the same domain name as what follows your @ or is a subdomain thereof) and I'll send you the money in your prefered (reasonable) fasion.

    Are We Agreed?

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  4. Re:Wow. by InfoVore · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't doubt it is real. The fact that his machine only can generate 4 neutrons/minute above background makes it kind of wimpy fusor.

    I had a boss once who built a Farnesworth-style fusor from scrounged parts sometime back in the late 60's or early 70's. He told me he kept it behind his desk for years.

    At the time he ran the Nuclear Effects - Solar Thermal Test Facility at White Sands Missile Range (basically a BIG concentrating mirror for simulating the intense heat of a nuclear blast and its effect on materials). Frequently they would get VIP visitors dropping in from the Pentagon, major universities, etc. He would always take the visitors on a walking tour of the facility. He would flip the machine on ahead of time and turn on a geiger counter he kept next to his desk. At the end of the tour he would take the visitors to his office. Usually the visitors would notice the clicking sound after a few minutes of chit-chat and ask "what's making that sound?" He would then dead-pan "oh that's nothing, that's just the radiation from my fusion reactor" and wave the geiger counter back and forth across the machine, generating lots of above background clicking.

    The fusor was completely safe and the neutron radiation from it was well within safe limits, but frequently the visitors would require a bit of calming down after his little joke.

    I think at least one general thought he had created a fusion power source and wanted to classify the whole deal and immediately fund development. Don't imagine he was too happy when he found out it used alot of energy and produced only a few neutrons.

    --
    "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
  5. Re:Farnsworth and TV by sbszine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Since Marconi's invention of wireless telegraphy in 1897," ...which shows that they don't know that the telegraph was invented by Morse (in 1835) and that precedence for the "wireless" goes to Tesla--not Marconi.

    Not sure if this is a very odd troll or not. Anyway, for the benefit of the public... Morse invented the wired telegraph, so he's got no claim on wireless telegraphy and is irrelevant to the issue. Marconi was transmitting Morse code in 1895, whereas Tesla started transmitting voltage in 1893. So yes, Tesla was transmitting wirelessly first, but it was in 100,000 volt discharges of electricity -- hardly the sort of transmission you'd like to receive in your headphones! And plainly not intended to be a telegraph.

    Tesla was a cool guy and invented lots of interesting stuff, but people have a tendency to get all cultish about him and ascribe all sorts of miracles to him. Rather than claiming Marconi's work as his, you'd do his memory a better service by honouring him for his own achievements (like AC power).

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  6. Fusion that GENERATES electricity by ThesQuid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I actually read quite a bit on these devices a few weeks ago when the cold fusion article came up on /.
    One of the things I came across was Fusor, which is essentially a site for people who do this as a hobby.
    The most interesting thing I found was a link to the work of a gentleman named Eric Lerner. He actually has a workable, scalable, power-generating reactor. His is based on "dense plasma focus". Thing is, he's already got the thing to 1 billion degrees - and he's going for the big time - the aneutronic p-B11 reaction. That only generates alpha particles - which can be directly converted into electricity. No nasty turbines or steam! Pretty amazing.

  7. Re:Um.... by DocJohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Farnsworth really was a genius at manipulating electric fields. It's too bad he died early, or he might've been able to figure out how to make his fusor practical.

    If by dying early you mean that 65 years old is "early," then sure... But for someone who conceived the principles of television at 13 years old and holds 300 U.S. and foreign patents, I'd say he did pretty good for himself in his lifetime. If only people spent more time thinking and inventing and less time reading /....

  8. Re:Um.... by Cyclotron_Boy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The cyclotron was a lot of fun to build. My project went over a little better at the ISEF than that guy's Hirsch/Farnsworth Fusor. I also built a linear accelerator for the ISEF. In college I built a breeder reactor as a part of the U of C Scavenger Hunt. My reactor was somewhat like David Hahn's, but we quantified the amount of Uranium and Plutonium we made. I was also involved with D. Hahn's documentary. They used me as a science advisor- check out the credits. But the reason I'm writing this is that I am no longer doing research at Fermi National Accelerator Lab. Now I'm doing research and development in the private sector.

    -Fred