Slashdot Mirror


UK Makes Spamming a Fineable Offense

woodhouse writes "The BBC has an article about the new UK anti-spamming law which comes into force later this year. Under the new law, spammers can be fined up to 5000 pounds in a magistrates court, or an unlimited amount in the crown court. Sadly, prison terms won't be used to enforce of the new law."

21 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I WIN FAGS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Man, I had to reboot my windows box after running that. What kind of idiot are you, huh? With first post comes responsibility!

  2. could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Better to be fined up to 5000 pounds in a magistrates court...

    ...than to be pounded by 5000 magistrates.

    ...or courted by a 5000 pound magistrate.

  3. You insensitive clod... by JLSigman · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... I live in America! ;-)

    --
    -jls
    Techno-pagan
  4. Oh no! by Prince_Ali · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sadly, prison terms won't be used to enforce of the new law.

    Oh no, we need to get these violent people off the streets before they e-mail again!

  5. Jail time? by C_Kode · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sadly, prison terms won't be used to enforce of the new law.

    Jail time? How about death sentence.

  6. skip prison... by ejbst25 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...straight to death sentence!

    Seriously...while we all hate spam...someone *really* wants spammers in jail? On the right is the rapist, then murderer, then child molester, then spammer.

    1. Re:skip prison... by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep. I can picture it... Sounds perfect. In fact, it makes me smile.

      I wonder if the spammer would be interested in selling penis enlargements to his cellmates?

      --
      -- No sig for you!
    2. Re:skip prison... by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 4, Funny

      So the biggest one . . . the biggest, meanest nastiest father-raper . . . he comes over to me and says, "Kid, what'd you get?"

      "I didn't get nothin'," I said, "I had to pay $100,000 and help secure a couple dozen open relays."

      "What were you in for?"

      "Spamming"

      . . . and they all moved away from me on the Group W bench and gave me the hairy eyeball and all sorts of mean nasty stuff, until I said "and promoting Viagra and free pr0n" and they all shook my hand and we had a great time playing with the pencils and using the computers on the shelf by the window to strip a couple of mailing lists for addresses.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
  7. 5000 pounds, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    5000 pounds... I'd say, 2.5 tons is a pretty hefty fine :)

  8. Billy Tauzin's Opt-Out spam bill by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Billy Tauzin continues to promote Opt-out... which means anyone can spam you as much as possible until you complain. Then, they have someone else spam you, and then you complain, and then someone else spams you, and this continues until someone gets killed. Opt-out. What a terrible idea! But, no one in politics knows anything about technology. Most politicians are puppets. Democrats and Republicans both.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  9. 5000 pounds you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if instead of being fined 5000 pounds, spammers were forced to eat 5000 pounds of SPAM? Just a thought.

  10. Re:UK?!?!?! What about the hurricane!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    C'mon. This is North Carolina we're talking about here. I don't think that there's over a billion dollars in assets in all the carolinas.

    After all, what's the going rate for a trailer?

  11. Re:Prison should be reserved for violent criminals by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
    > All it would take would be a night in a holding cell... just a short stint with a 300 lb criminal. Then, a few of the stories would get out.

    Subject: H0T PR1S0N R4P3...........493121742
    Subject: R A P E ACTION!
    Subject: F|_|CK1NG in Jai1!!1!!1 (ye47fa3d)

    You were saying?

  12. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you really think the BBC will suffer the Slashdot effect? They won't even notice the extra traffic. They are the biggest and most visited content site (i.e. not Google) on the net and have bandwidth to spare. They have servers on at least two continents and publish their news in 43 languages. Now if the BBC posted a link to Slashdot on it's front page, then we might see the 'BBC effect'.

  13. Re:This is a good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I too would like to see the end of Braveheart but sadly there are too many copies already out there to make it feasible.

  14. Better punishment idea by thorgil · · Score: 2, Funny


    Make them copy each mail...BY HAND!

    If the spammer send 10 000 of a specific message:
    Punish him by making him write 10 000 copies of the mail sent. With PEN and PAPER.

    And of course... the spammer would have to pay for the papers and pens as well.

    That ought to teach him/her!!!

    And yeah... if the mail contains images or such...
    let him/her write the ones and zeroes....

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  15. Re:Huh? by spuke4000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    let's stop with the juvenille, knee-jerk reactions

    You must be new here.

    --
    This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
  16. Re:This is a good start by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 2, Funny

    The US will use the anti-spam laws around the world to their advantage, creating a massive subsidised US spam industry, and putting huge tariffs on all the 'unfair' imported spam.

    Spam lobbyists will push for further subsidies each year while shutting out foreign spam supplies for their horrible spam dumping trade practices.

    The WTO will find in favour of the foreign spam sources time and time again, but the US will continue on because US spam is the only true spam.

    had enough?

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  17. Re:Prison should be reserved for violent criminals by CausticWindow · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just love the way Americans always equate prison with forced anal intercourse. It's an everyday thing, just like going to McDonalds.

    Never once heard any of you outraged over this matter. It's just a fact of life, and something you most probably deserve when you go to prison. A good hard pounding in the ass.

    It's a good thing that the US legal system is infallible, and that your judges probably take this into account when they pass sentences. Five years imprisonment in most other developed countries probably equates to two years with three brutal ass poundings per day in an American one.

    Mighty fine country you're running over there.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  18. Stone the *&^*% spammers by RealRav · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm all for public stoning! I can honestly say I've never spammed and am willing to cast the first.

    Dreams are better as dreams than reality.
    Rav

  19. "new UK anti-spamming law " by kclittle · · Score: 4, Funny
    Does this mean some of the Monty Python skits are now illegal in their country of origin? Jus'wunnering...

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.