Slashdot Mirror


Galileo, Consumed by Jupiter

Conceived in 1977, launched in 1989, the spacecraft Galileo ends its 34th orbit exactly one hour from now, hitting the atmosphere at 48 kilometers a second. In its long history, it taught us much, despite the failure of its main antenna that left only its tiny backup to send data, but its enduring legacy will always be the discovery that Europa's icy crust hides a planetary saltwater ocean. That ocean's potential for alien life is why the craft will self-vaporize: to avoid possible terrestrial contamination. The JPL's webcast starts roughly now, and should last about two hours (light delay). Don't miss the view from the prow and impact animations. If you're into these spacecraft and the people who build them, read Journey Beyond Selene. And while we grieve for Galileo today, remember, orbital insertion for Cassini-Huygens is only 283 days away!

We ran stories about Galileo's impending incineration earlier this month and last November when the plan was decided.

Here is a typical passage from Journey Beyond Selene, about the worst glitch in Galileo's mission, and the beginnings of how it would be worked around. Failures and the engineers who salvage them are the recurring tragic, triumphant story of our missions into space. Reproduced without permission:

With such triply redundant hardware built into their spacecraft, mission planners could feel confident that they had designed a communications system that was almost completely resistant to failure, and for the first eighteen months after Galileo's 1989 launch, there was no reason to assume anything would fail. Finally, on April 11, 1991, when the ship's trajectory had spiraled out as far as the edge of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, JPL planners decided it was at last probably safe to unlock the high-gain antenna and spread its ribs. It was only then that they'd learn if triply redundant was redundant enough.

Though the deployment of the high-gain system was not a complicated exercise, it was a critical one, and for that reason the chieftans of the Galileo project made sure they were there to watch it happen. On hand at the flight director's console that afternoon were mission director Neal Ausman, deputy mission director Matt Landanow, and project manager Bill O'Neil. O'Neil and Ausman were far and away the higher ranking of the three men, but Landanow, they all knew, was far and away the most knowledgeable. As chief engineer during the Galileo design phase, he had familiarized himself with every strut, nut and rivet of the ship, and could practically describe their placement and purpose from memory alone. If anything went wrong this afternoon, Landanow would likely be the first person to recognize it -- and the first person to come up with a way to fix it.

For the first forty minutes or so after the deployment command went up, O'Neil, Ausman and Landanow had little to do. Like so many other JPL controllers before them, they knew they would have to tolerate the nonnegotiable limits of light speed, waiting twenty minutes as their signal traveled from Pasadena to the spacecraft and then another twenty minutes as it traveled back again. For that entire time their screens told them nothing, flickering merely with the self-evident information that their command had indeed been sent. Finally, after just over the anticipated forty minutes had elapsed, a column of numbers began to blink on the glass. Landanow gave the figures a quick scan and immediately noticed something amiss. He read them again -- a bit more closely -- and this time started to feel downright queasy. The antenna, from all indications, was pulling what the engineers called stall current. The motor was drawing power, the deployment gears were engaged, but the ribs of the umbrella appeared to be going nowhere at all.

"We're stuck," Landanow said flatly.

"How can you tell?" O'Neil asked.

"The current is saturated, something is jammed," Landanow said. "In any event, the antenna's not budging."

Ausman gave the numbers on the screen a read of his own, confirmed what Landanow was saying, and immediately called out to his flight controllers, instructing them to send a second deployment command up to the ship. The engineers complied, and forty minutes later another stall signal came down. A third command yielded a third signal, and a fourth a fourth. With each new report Landanow winced. If he knew this ship -- and he surely did -- he could all but guarantee that whatever was hanging up the antenna was not much: a single too-tight fitting, perhaps, a single protruding bolt, one that was situated in just such a way that it managed to jam all eighteen ribs. If it were somehow possible to transport the Galileo spacecraft to a hangar in Pasadena, Landanow knew he could probably roll over a stepladder, climb up to the antenna, and spring it free with his hands alone. But Galileo was not in a hangar in Pasadena; it was tens of millions of miles away, at the edge of the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, and more elaborate measures would be necessary.

17 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Watching online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI, NASA TV has a live webcast here. UATV is another place to watch as they are rebroadcasting the NASA channel...

    1. Re:Watching online by jd · · Score: 2, Informative
      There a a billion (or so) CU-SeeMe repeaters of NASA Select, and they also broadcast on the Multibone.


      The CU-SeeMe transmissions are B/W and fairly small image, but update much faster than the webcast.


      The multicast version is in full color, and appears to be 1/2 NTSC image size. (It pixellates slightly at larger sizes.)


      If you've access to the MBone, I strongly recommend getting SDR, VIC and RAT from the MICE project, over at UCL. There should be links to these projects from Freshmeat. There are binaries for most Unixes and Windows. The quality is vastly superior to the other forms.


      If you're stuck on a regular system, CU-SeeMe is still miles better than the webcast, as it's served from many many more sites. The result is that each site isn't hammered bandwidth-wise. Besides, web-based updates tend to be in seconds (cos refresh is lousy). CU-SeeMe broadcasts from NASA tend to be in the order of 7-15 frames per second, depending on the time of day and net usage.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  2. Re:Goodbye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't forget Pioneer 10!
    Pioneer 11 is also somewhere though scientist do not know if 11 is still transmitting signal. After 4 million years(!) it will reach constellation of Aquila.

  3. Re:Wow, I was worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a little snack for the troll ... if you heard it on the radio, it probably wasn't a reputable source. See http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/jupiter_galil eo.html

  4. Alternate feeds of NASA TV by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since Jamie rather thoughtlessly posted a direct link to the JPL real stream and now none of us can see it; please visit NASA's website listing all the alternate feeds for NASA TV and use one of these instead.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  5. Re:Outstanding achievement by s20451 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The quest to get usable data out of Galileo has driven some of the world's most advanced communication and signal processing algorithms over the past few years. AS a result they were able to achieve a better than ten fold increase in data rate from 10 bps to a maximum of 120 bps, a pretty spectacular achievement that saved the mission. You can read the technical details here

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  6. Re:a new Sun? by Dan+Weaver · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, no offense, but this is the most laughable thing I have ever heard.

    a) The main fissionable form of plutonium is Pu-239, not Pu-238.

    b) Even if this was Pu-239 on board, forty pounds thereof is a borderline critical mass. You would need tampers to make it a good bomb.

    c) Even if this was Pu-239 on board and there was enough of it for a critical mass, it is not arranged in a critical geometry that will produce good fission under a Jovian pressure crush.

    d) Even if this was Pu-239 in a critical mass in a critical geometry, Galileo lacks the tritium primer required to kickstart a fusion reaction from a fission reaction.

    e) Even if Galileo had a working thermonuclear weapon on board, a thermonuclear detonation on Jupiter would not blow up Jupiter, because there isn't enough of an oxygen fraction in the Jovian atmosphere to set the hydrogen afire. Think about it. Jupiter has collided with large asteroids and comets before now. These collisions give off heat considerably in excess of any nuclear detonation. The huge pressures at Jupiter's interior produce heat considerably in excess of any nuclear detonation. If Jupiter could have turned into a star (it cannot) it would have done so by now.

    f) Learn more about physics.

  7. Re:RealBad by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Informative

    nope, two streams are in windows media format. Though I'm not sure if that's better or worse.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  8. Re:a new Sun? by theycallmeB · · Score: 5, Informative

    Short version: There is absolutely nothing to worry about. Read on for the long version.

    That is because throwing 48 pounds of Pu-238 (which is useless as weapons grade material, Pu-239 is much better for sustaining fission chain reactions) into Jupiter is like tossing a salt shaker into the ocean. Jupiter already has massive radition belts generated by its interactions with the solar wind. It has surely ingested more than 48 pounds of the various isotopes of Uranium from the thousands or millions of meteorite strikes Jupiter has sustained. And the total energy that could be released by complete fission of all of that plutonium into stable elements would insignificant next to the gravitational-potential energy released by the steady contraction of Jupiter's gas clouds that results from the planet's massive gravitational pull. Because of this contraction, Jupiter already releases significantly more energy back into space that it absorbs from the sun.

    Finally, with a total mass that is about 0.0001 times that of the Sun, Jupiter is too small to support fusion reactions in its core by about two (2) orders of magnitude. The smallest stars are about 0.08 times the Sun's mass.

  9. Re:Why? by applemasker · · Score: 5, Informative
    Because of Galileo's extemely elliptical orbit -- think of a comet around the sun -- (required because it's mission was to visit most of Jupiter's moons), it's constantly in need of tweaking in the form of thruster firings to keep it from blundering into something (besides Jupiter) while still keeping its antennae pointed towards Earth.

    The maneuvering fuel is nearly gone, and the spacecraft components have sustained many tens of times their design tolerances of radiation. Taken together, it's entirely possible that Galileo would soon become uncontrollable and crash somewhere like Eurpoa, where we may one day send probes to search for life. Because Galileo was not sterilized before launch, it would contaminate wherever it ended up, and could cast doubt of any future test results from expeditions there.

    (As a testimony to the hardiness of life, microbes on a camera lens or something were brought to and back from the moon, it wasn't until later that they realized someone sneezed on the lens or some nonsense and the damn bugs survived the whole round trip).

    While it would be nostalgic to have left Galileo in orbital purgatory around Jupiter, it's not possible to do this with any assurance that it won't later be a hazard. It is fitting, in a way, that Galileo will become part of Jupiter, the target of so much of its (and his) focus. If only NASA would bring the success of this mission into the public spotlight as a way to raise awareness as to its more successful programs.

    Coming soon to Saturn - Cassini, July 4, 2004. (Alas, the last of the "great explorer" probes.)

    --
    Bush Lies On the Record.
  10. Re:Relative to ...? by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jupiter is not "larger" than Earth, it's a whole hell of a lot larger than Earth. According to Google:

    mass of Jupiter / mass of Earth = 317.816611

    So Jupiter has 317 times the mass of Earth. That's why the orbit is faster.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  11. Re:Why? by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Informative

    The amount of radiation in Galileo's plutonium decay generator is insignificant compared to the radiation the Jovian moons get from Jupiter's magnetosphere and background levels of cosmic rays - it'd be a bit like a needle made of hay in a haystack.

    Any bacteria on the craft would probably be killed by the radiation as well, but it isn't really worth taking that chance (life is amazingly tenacious).

    But more thanjust the "safety" aspect, there are real reasons why Galileo had to go down - JPL wanted ot use the starfinder camera to observe some rocks near Amalthea that may have been magnetically lifted off the surface of the moon, and they wanted to use it's final minutes to observe parts of the exosphere.

  12. Re:a new Sun? by RayBender · · Score: 4, Informative
    No comet fragment can reach Jupiter's core. The only way to reach the core is by sinking slowly, but then by definition you don't have kinetic energy. If the plutonium inside Galileo explodes, it won't compare with SL9 in terms of megatons, but it will be the first time an explosion occurs so deep inside Jupiter. I hope you can see the qualitative difference.

    Bzzt. You fail physics. 1) the probe will likely be vaporized into a 1000-km trail of dust by the impact with the atmosphere at 48 km/s. It won't slow down intact and then sink into the core of Jupiter. 2) The temperature reaches the melting point of metal a few thousand kms down into Jupiter. Even if the probe was intact by the time it sank that far, it would melt/dissolve long before it reached the core. 3) The RTG's contain Pu-238, which as has been stated repeatedly, is not suitable as a nuclear explosive. 4) Even if there was an explosion, it is so incredibly miniscule compared to the mass/size of Jupiter that it simply would not matter. 5) Jupiter CANNOT sustain nuclear fusion - it simply lacks the mass. The pressure in the core is far too low to overcome Coulomb repulsion between protons so that they can fuse. The minimum mass of a star that can sustain fusion is approximately 75 Jupiter masses. That is very, very well-understood physics (look up the astronomical tem "brown dwarf").

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  13. Re:Wow, I was worried by Noren · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nonsense. Apparently you missed all the other quotes on this thread, or didn't believe them. Just in case it'll help, here is the math. Note that Jupiter is not even close to half of the mass required for sustained fusion.

  14. Jupiter's Escape Velocity is 56 km/sec by localroger · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's just that much bigger than Earth. The figure startled me at first, too.

    It's amazing that the atmosphere probe, which entered at 47 km/sec, managed a controlled deceleration and survived.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  15. Re:Wow, I was worried by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Informative
    That was obviously from the "Radioactive things will explode easily" believers with a sense of "If I haven't seen it before, it is something new" for history.

    • The plutonium is too little for a bomb, and arranged to only warm a device which converts heat to electricity.
    • There is plutonium in those cinder blocks around your basement, and in the lawn and rock garden. BOOM!
    • Someone forgot those big comet pieces which hit Jupiter a few years ago. If a fireball was going to ignite Jupiter we would have seen it happen then.
    • No matter how much hydrogen is in Jupiter's atmosphere, it won't catch fire or explode. Not enough oxygen.
    • A fire, even on a planetary scale, won't give off enough heat or light to bother our planet.
    • Even amateur astronomers know that Jupiter is well known for affecting asteroid orbits, and undoubtedly has been hit by many asteroids. Even a small metallic asteroid has many more fissionable elements than have been mined or that we can reach to mine them. So huge amounts of radioactives have already hit Jupiter.
    • Those asteroids also created fireballs bigger than Texas. The little heat is less than nothing.
    • Life is dangerous. Jupiter isn't a threat. A few days ago we got blasted by a star far across the Milky Way with more power than the Sun hits us with. If a nova or another magnetar like that one nearby hits us, then we either have something to worry about or we won't have anything to worry about ever. All our eggs are in this one basket.
  16. Re:Wrong tense by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you notice the comma? It's not "Galileo consumed by Jupiter", which is past tense. It's "Galileo, consumed by Jupiter" which has no tense.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....