Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Apple Releases Darwin 6.7, 6.8

Posted by pudge on from the makin-copies dept.

PowerMacDaddy writes "In an ongoing effort to keep the FreeBSD core of OS X open source, Apple has updated Darwin to 6.7 and 6.8, which corresponds to the OS X 10.2.7 and 10.2.8 updates, respectively. Source code is available."

4 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. Question by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is Darwin better than *BSD?

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Question by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is Darwin better than *BSD?

      No. It's just a little different. It uses a different kernel. It has a different architecture for device drivers. It uses a NetInfo to store various configuration information.

      It doesn't have FreeBSD Ports (a simple way for users and administrators to install applications). It's got it's own thing instead, which isn't as good (yet).

      The reason I'd use BSD is for FreeBSD Ports, so I think the folks using Darwin are mostly just doing it since no one else is, and it's geeky.

      It also makes sense if you're primarily interested in administering a MacOS X network, but I don't see why you wouldn't spend the cash on Mac OS X Server.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  2. Re:Does not compute. by FredFnord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > So, when they don't update it, it would become closed somehow? I don't get it.

    When they don't update darwin to match the updates in MacOS X, the FreeBSD core of (the current release of) MacOS X isn't open source.

    Even for an annoying nitpicker like me, that was a perfectly reasonable sentence.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  3. Following Darwin by jollygreengiantlikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone been following the source's development closely-eg: what updates beyond the security fixes were included in the kernel?
    There had purportedly been a memory leak in 10.2.6 (corresponding to Darwin 6.6)-any confirmation of that or a possible fix in these lastest versions of Darwin?

    JGG